Numerical Analysis of the Wing Leading Edge Electro-Impulse De-Icing Process Based on Cohesive Zone Model
Source abstract
Abstract
Aircraft icing has historically been a critical cause of airplane crashes. The electro-impulse de-icing system has a wide range of applications in aircraft de-icing due to its lightweight design, low energy consumption, high efficiency, and other advantages. However, there has been little study into accurate wing electric-impulse de-icing simulation methods and the parameters impacting de-icing efficacy. Based on the damage mechanics principle and considering the influence mechanisms of interface debonding and ice fracture on ice shedding, this paper establishes a more accurate numerical model of wing electric-impulse de-icing using the Cohesive Zone Model (CZM). It simulates the process of electric-impulse de-icing at the leading edge of the NACA 0012 wing. The numerical results are compared to the experimental results, revealing that the constructed wing electro-impulse de-icing numerical model is superior. Lastly, the effects of varying ice–skin interface shear adhesion strengths, doubler loading positions, and impulse sequences on de-icing effectiveness were studied. The de-icing rate is a quantitative description of the electro-impulse’s de-icing action, defined in the numerical model as the ratio of cohesive element deletions to the total elements at the ice–skin interface. The findings reveal that varying shear adhesion strengths at the ice–skin interface significantly impact the de-icing effect. The de-icing rate steadily falls with increasing shear adhesion strength, from 66% to 56%. When two, four, and seven impulses were applied to doubler two, the de-icing rates were 59%, 71%, and 71%, respectively, significantly increasing the de-icing efficiency compared to when impulses were applied to doubler one. Doubler one and two impulse responses are overlaid differently depending on the impulse sequences, resulting in varying de-icing rates. When the impulse sequence is 20 ms, the superposition results are optimal, and the de-icing rate reaches 100%. These studies can guide the development and implementation of a wing electric-impulse de-icing system.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Icing and De-icing Technologies · Smart Materials for Construction · Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of the Xinjiang Uygur. Autonomous Region
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. Yamazaki, M., Jemcov, A., and Sakaue, H. (2021). A Review on the Current Status of Icing Physics and Mitigation in Aviation. Aerospace, 8.10.3390/aerospace8070188 ↗
2. Aircraft icing: An ongoing threat to aviation safety10.1016/j.ast.2017.12.028 ↗
3. Bragg, M., Hutchison, T., and Merret, J. (2000, January 10–13). Effect of ice accretion on aircraft flight dynamics. Proceedings of the 38th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.2514/6.2000-360 ↗
4. Piscitelli, F., Chiariello, A., Dabkowski, D., Corraro, G., Marra, F., and Di Palma, L. (2020). Superhydrophobic Coatings as Anti-Icing Systems for Small Aircraft. Aerospace, 7.10.3390/aerospace7010002 ↗
5. A comparative study of the icephobic and self-cleaning properties of Teflon materials having different surface morphologies10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116415 ↗
6. Bio-Inspired Icephobic Coatings for Aircraft Icing Mitigation: A Critical Review10.7569/RAA.2020.097307 ↗
7. Spraying Fabrication of Durable and Transparent Coatings for Anti-Icing Application: Dynamic Water Repellency, Icing Delay, and Ice Adhesion10.1021/acsami.8b19225 ↗
8. A survey of icephobic coatings and their potential use in a hybrid coating/active ice protection system for aerospace applications10.1016/j.paerosci.2019.01.002 ↗
9. Morita, K., Kimura, S., and Sakaue, H. (2020). Hybrid System Combining Ice-Phobic Coating and Electrothermal Heating for Wing Ice Protection. Aerospace, 7.10.3390/aerospace7080102 ↗
10. An experimental study on a hot-air-based anti-/de-icing system for aero-engine inlet guide vanes10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114778 ↗
11. Novel sandwich structural electric heating coating for anti-icing/de-icing on complex surfaces10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126489 ↗
12. Unsteady simulation of aircraft electro-thermal deicing process with temperature-based method10.1177/0954410019866066 ↗
13. The physical properties of organic aircraft deicers under low temperature10.1016/j.coldregions.2021.103471 ↗
14. Oxygen Demand of Aircraft and Airfield Pavement Deicers and Alternative Freezing Point Depressants10.1007/s11270-011-1036-x ↗
15. Full-Scale Testing of a Centrifugally Powered Pneumatic De-Icing System for Helicopter Rotor Blades10.2514/1.C033965 ↗
16. Effect of Intercycle Ice Accretions on Airfoil Performance10.2514/1.1683 ↗
17. Villeneuve, E., Ghinet, S., and Volat, C. (2021). Experimental Study of a Piezoelectric De-Icing System Implemented to Rotorcraft Blades. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11219869 ↗
18. Piezoelectric Deicing System for Rotorcraft10.4050/JAHS.60.042001 ↗
19. An accurate deicing method by utilizing the piezoelectric materials based on the active mode control theory10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107804 ↗
20. Villeneuve, E., Volat, C., and Ghinet, S. (2020). Numerical and Experimental Investigation of the Design of a Piezoelectric De-Icing System for Small Rotorcraft Part 2/3: Investigation of Transient Vibration during Frequency Sweeps and Optimal Piezoelectric Actuator Excitation. Aerospace, 7.10.3390/aerospace7050049 ↗
21. An effect assessment and prediction method of ultrasonic de-icing for composite wind turbine blades10.1016/j.renene.2017.10.074 ↗
22. Damage accumulation model of ice detach behavior in ultrasonic de-icing technology10.1016/j.renene.2020.02.069 ↗
23. Numerical simulation and experimental validation of ultrasonic de-icing system for wind turbine blade10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.07.004 ↗
24. Yeoman, K. (1994, January 10–13). Efficiency of a bleed air powered inlet icing protective system. Proceedings of the 32nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA.10.2514/6.1994-717 ↗
25. Ding, L., Chang, S.L., and Leng, M. (2016, January 10–12). Transient characteristics of an electrothermal anti-icing process based on the improved messinger model. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Aircraft Utility Systems (AUS), Beijing, China.10.1109/AUS.2016.7748052 ↗
26. An experimental study on the detrimental effects of deicing fluids on the performance of icephobic coatings for aircraft icing mitigation10.1016/j.ast.2021.107090 ↗
27. Occurrence, distribution and fluxes of benzotriazoles along the German large river basins into the North Sea10.1016/j.watres.2011.09.028 ↗
28. Biodegradation of three selected benzotriazoles under aerobic and anaerobic conditions10.1016/j.watres.2011.07.001 ↗
29. Design of an advanced pneumatic deicer for the composite rotor blade10.2514/3.45866 ↗
30. Zhu, Y., Palacios, J., Rose, J., and Smith, E. (2008, January 7–10). De-Icing of Multi-Layer Composite Plates Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves. Proceedings of the AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, & Materials Conference AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference, Schaumburg, IL, USA.10.2514/6.2008-1862 ↗
31. Piezoelectric Transducer Actuated Leading Edge De-Icing with Simultaneous Shear and Impulse Forces10.2514/1.23996 ↗
32. USSR electric impulse de-icing system design10.1108/eb034921 ↗
33. Khatkhate, A., Scavuzzo, R., and Chu, M. (1988, January 11–14,). AIAA. A finite element study of the EIDI system. Proceedings of the 26th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV, USA. 22p.10.2514/6.1988-22 ↗
34. Modelling electro-impulse de-icing process in leading edge structure and impact fatigue life prediction of rivet holes in critical areas10.1177/0954410019896450 ↗
35. Simulation of the Electroimpulse De-Icing Process of Aircraft Wings10.2514/1.21321 ↗
36. Jiang, X., and Wang, Y. (2019). Studies on the Electro-Impulse De-Icing System of Aircraft. Aerospace, 6.10.3390/aerospace6060067 ↗
37. Li, Q., Zhu, C., and Bai, T. (2012, January 23–26). Numerical Simulation and Experimental Verification of the Electro-Impulse De-Icing System. Proceedings of the 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference 20th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference 14th AIAA, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.2514/6.2012-1992 ↗
38. Yielding of steel sheets containing slits10.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 ↗
39. The formation of equilibrium cracks during brittle fracture. General ideas and hypotheses. Axially-symmetric cracks10.1016/0021-8928(59)90157-1 ↗
40. Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements10.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-7 ↗
41. Discrete cohesive zone model for mixed-mode fracture using finite element analysis10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.03.006 ↗
42. Linear Elastic and Cohesive Fracture Analysis to Model Hydraulic Fracture in Brittle and Ductile Rocks10.1007/s00603-011-0211-0 ↗
43. On the influence of the shape of the interface law on the application of cohesive-zone models10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.12.024 ↗
44. Measurement of mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites with mixed-mode bending apparatus10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X ↗
45. Numerical simulations of quasibrittle fracture processes using the discrete cohesive crack model10.1016/S0020-7403(98)00115-5 ↗
46. Grain based modelling of rocks using the combined finite-discrete element method10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.07.003 ↗
47. An improved ordinary state-based peridynamic model for cohesive crack growth in quasi-brittle materials10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.02.019 ↗
48. Flexural characteristics of artificial ice in winter sports rinks: Experimental study and nondestructive prediction based on surface hardness method10.1007/s43452-022-00387-8 ↗
49. Friction of rough surfaces on ice: Experiments and modeling10.1016/j.wear.2016.10.001 ↗
50. Analysis of the mechanical behavior of thin ice layers on structures including radial cracking and de-icing10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.04.038 ↗
51. Numerical simulation and validation of electro-impulse de-icing on a leading edge structure10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.102392 ↗
52. An engineering solution for mesh size effects in the simulation of delamination using cohesive zone models10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.08.025 ↗
53. A Critical Evaluation of Cohesive Zone Models of Dynamic Fracture
54. Application of improved cohesive zone length formula in ice mode I crack propagation
55. Herrnring, H., Kellner, L., Kubiczek, J.M., and Ehlers, S. (2019, January 14–16). A cohesive model for ice and its verification with tensile splitting tests. Proceedings of the 12th European LS-DYNA Conference 2019, Koblenz, Germany.
56. Dawood, B., Yavas, D., and Bastawros, A. (2020, January 15–19). Characterization of Ice Adhesion: Approaches and Modes of Loading. Proceedings of the AIAA Aviation 2020 Forum, Virtual.10.2514/6.2020-2802 ↗
57. Dawood, B., Yavas, D., Giuffre, C., and Bastawros, A. (2019). Utilization of Single Cantilever Beam Test for Characterization of Ice Adhesion. SAE Tech. Pap.10.4271/2019-01-1949 ↗
58. Dawood, B., Giuffre, C., and Bastawros, A. (2018, January 25–29). Fracture Mechanics Based Approach for Ice Adhesion Characterization. Proceedings of the 2018 Atmospheric and Space Environments Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA.
59. Yavas, D., Bastawros, A., Dawood, B., and Giuffre, C. (2019). Characterization of Mode-II Interfacial Fracture Toughness of Ice/Metal Interfaces. SAE Tech. Pap.10.4271/2019-01-1947 ↗
60. Simulation and validation of slat de-icing by an electromechanical system
61. Sommerwerk, H., Horst, P., and Bansmer, S. (2016, January 13–17). Studies on Electro Impulse De-Icing of a Leading Edge Structure in an Icing Wind Tunnel. Proceedings of the 8th AIAA Atmospheric and Space Environments Conference, Washington, DC, USA.10.2514/6.2016-3441 ↗