journal article·2024-03-13Open access

GLBRF: Group-Based Lightweight Human Behavior Recognition Framework in Video Camera

Young-Chan Lee, So-Yeon Lee, Byeongchang Kim, Dae-Young Kim

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 6

Abstract

Behavioral recognition is an important technique for recognizing actions by analyzing human behavior. It is used in various fields, such as anomaly detection and health estimation. For this purpose, deep learning models are used to recognize and classify the features and patterns of each behavior. However, video-based behavior recognition models require a lot of computational power as they are trained using large datasets. Therefore, there is a need for a lightweight learning framework that can efficiently recognize various behaviors. In this paper, we propose a group-based lightweight human behavior recognition framework (GLBRF) that achieves both low computational burden and high accuracy in video-based behavior recognition. The GLBRF system utilizes a relatively small dataset to reduce computational cost using a 2D CNN model and improves behavior recognition accuracy by applying location-based grouping to recognize interaction behaviors between people. This enables efficient recognition of multiple behaviors in various services. With grouping, the accuracy was as high as 98%, while without grouping, the accuracy was relatively low at 68%.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications · Human Pose and Action Recognition · Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Computer Software, Daegu Catholic University, Gyeongsan 38430, Republic of Korea

Department of Software Convergence, Soonchunhyang University, Asan 31538, Republic of Korea

School of Computer Software, Daegu Catholic University, Gyeongsan 38430, Republic of Korea

Department of Computer Software Engineering, Soonchunhyang University, Asan 31538, Republic of Korea

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) · Soonchunhyang University

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Lu, J., Nguyen, M., and Yan, W.Q. (2020, January 25–27). Deep Learning Methods for Human Behavior Recognition. Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Image and Vision Computing New Zealand (IVCNZ), Wellington, New Zealand.10.1109/IVCNZ51579.2020.9290640 ↗
2. Fort, A., Peruzzi, G., and Pozzebon, A. (2021, January 7–9). Quasi-Real Time Remote Video Surveillance Unit for LoRaWAN-based Image Transmission. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 & IoT (MetroInd4.0&IoT), Rome, Italy.10.1109/MetroInd4.0IoT51437.2021.9488519 ↗
3. A Review of Computer Vision Techniques for Video Violence Detection and intelligent video surveillance systems
4. Human Behavior Recognition from Multiview Videos10.1016/j.ins.2020.01.002 ↗
5. Overview of behavior recognition based on deep learning10.1007/s10462-022-10210-8 ↗
6. Jannat, T., Sayeed, A., and Afrin, S. (2021, January 8–9). Supervised Linear Discriminant Analysis for Dimension Reduction and Hyperspectral Image Classification Method Based on 2D-3D CNN. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Automation, Control and Mechatronics for Industry 4.0 (ACMI), Rajshashi, Bangladesh.10.1109/ACMI53878.2021.9528191 ↗
7. Revisiting crowd behavior analysis through deep learning: Taxonomy, anomaly detection, crowd emotions, datasets, opportunities and prospects10.1016/j.inffus.2020.07.008 ↗
8. Munteanu, D., Moina, D., Zamfir, C.G., Petrea, Ș.M., Cristea, D.S., and Munteanu, N. (2022). Sea Mine Detection Framework Using YOLO, SSD and EfficientDet Deep Learning Models. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s22239536 ↗
9. Oroceo, P.P., Kim, J.-I., Caliwag, E.M.F., Kim, S.-H., and Lim, W. (2022). Optimizing Face Recognition Inference with a Collaborative Edge–Cloud Network. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22218371 ↗
10. Gul, M.A., Yousaf, M.H., Nawaz, S., Ur Rehman, Z., and Kim, H. (2020). Patient Monitoring by Abnormal Human Activity Recognition Based on CNN Architecture. Electronics, 9.10.3390/electronics9121993 ↗
11. Zhang., Z., Jin, Y., Feng, S., Li, Y., Wang, T., and Tian, H. (2022, January 21–24). FENet: An Efficient Feature Excitation Network for Video-based Human Action Recognition. Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing (ICSP), Beijing, China.10.1109/ICSP56322.2022.9965349 ↗
12. Human Action Recognition and Prediction: A Survey10.1007/s11263-022-01594-9 ↗
13. Vrskova, R., Hudec, R., Kamencay, P., and Sykora, P. (2022). Human Activity Classification Using the 3DCNN Architecture. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12020931 ↗
14. Wang, Y., and Sun, J. (2022, January 5–7). Video Human Action Recognition Algorithm Based on Double Branch 3D-CNN. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI), Beijing, China.10.1109/CISP-BMEI56279.2022.9979858 ↗
15. Bouali, S.N., and Amara, N.E.B. (2021, January 22–25). 3D CNN for Human Action Recognition. Proceedings of the 18th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals & Devices (SSD), Monastir, Tunisia.10.1109/SSD52085.2021.9429429 ↗
16. Comprehensive Analysis of Crowd Behavior Techniques: A Through Exploration10.12785/ijcds/110181 ↗
17. Elbishlawi, S., Abdelpakey, M.H., Eltantawy, A., Shehata, M.S., and Mohamed, M.M. (2020). Deep Learning-Based Crowd Scene Analysis Survey. J. Imag., 6.10.3390/jimaging6090095 ↗
18. Lazaridis, L., Dimou, A., and Daras, P. (2018, January 3–7). Abnormal Behavior Detection in Crowded Scenes Using Density Heatmaps and Optical Flow. Proceedings of the 26th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), Rome, Italy.10.23919/EUSIPCO.2018.8553620 ↗
19. You, Q., and Jiang, H. (2019, January 15–20). Action4d: Online action recognition in the crowd and clutter. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Long Beach, CA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2019.01213 ↗
20. Liu, C., Tao, Y., Liang, J., Li, K., and Chen, Y. (2018, January 14–16). Object Detection Based on YOLO Network. Proceedings of the IEEE 4th Information Technology and Mechatronics Engineering Conference (ITOEC), Chongqing, China.10.1109/ITOEC.2018.8740604 ↗
21. Maity, M., Banerjee, S., and Chaudhur, S.S. (2021, January 8–10). Faster R-CNN and YOLO based Vehicle detection: A Survey. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC), Erode, India.10.1109/ICCMC51019.2021.9418274 ↗
22. Tinier-YOLO: A Real-Time Object Detection Method for Constrained Environments10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2961959 ↗
23. Rahman, Z., Ami, A.M., and Ullah, M.A. (2020, January 5–7). A Real-Time Wrong-Way Vehicle Detection Based on YOLO and Centroid Tracking. Proceedings of the IEEE Region 10 Symposium (TENSYMP), Dhaka, Bangladesh.10.1109/TENSYMP50017.2020.9230463 ↗
24. Sukumar, S., and Libish, T.M. (2018, January 11–12). Centroid Based Human Annotation for Object Tracking. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI), Tirunelveli, India.10.1109/ICOEI.2018.8553733 ↗
25. SSDMNV2: A real time DNN-based face mask detection system using single shot multibox detectore and MobileNetV210.1016/j.scs.2021.102964 ↗
26. Saxen, F., Werner, P., Handrich, S., Othman, E., Dinges, L. (2019, January 23–25). Face Attribute Detection with MobileNetV2 and NasNet-Mobile. Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis (ISPA), Dubrovnik, Croatia.10.1109/ISPA.2019.8868585 ↗
27. Recent trends in human activity recognition–A comparative study10.1016/j.cogsys.2022.10.003 ↗
28. (2024, January 22). Size Korea. Available online: https://sizekorea.kr.
29. (2024, January 22). AI-Hub. Available online: https://aihub.or.kr.
30. Dileep, P., Das, D., and Bora, P.K. (2020, January 21–23). Dense Layer Dropout Based CNN Architecture for Automatic Modulation Classification. Proceedings of the National Conference on Communications (NCC), Kharagpur, India.10.1109/NCC48643.2020.9055989 ↗
31. Dropout vs. batch normalization: An empirical study of their impact to deep learning10.1007/s11042-019-08453-9 ↗
32. Ide, H., and Kurita, T. (2017, January 14–19). Improvement of learning for CNN with ReLU activation by sparse regularization. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Anchorage, AK, USA.10.1109/IJCNN.2017.7966185 ↗
33. Activation functions in neural networks
34. Minimum BER Criterion and Adaptive Moment Estimation Based Enhanced ICA for Wireless Communications10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3016989 ↗
35. Malaria Disease Detection Using CNN Technique with SGD, RMSprop and ADAM Optimizers10.1007/978-3-030-33966-1_11 ↗