journal article·2024-02-23Open access

Impact of the New International Land–Sea Transport Corridor on Port Competition between Neighboring Countries Based on a Spatial Duopoly Model

Chuanying Liu, Houming Fan, Hongzhi Miao, Hao Fan, Xiang Zhang

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 5

Abstract

The development of international land–sea transport corridors has provided more convenient access to the sea for inland areas and promoted the improvement of transportation efficiency, environmental improvement, and the strengthening of international cooperation. However, the construction of international land–sea transport corridors has also intensified competition among the ports, which has extended from the local and regional to the national and even international levels. This paper explores the impact of international land–sea transport corridors on oligopolistic port competition between neighboring countries using the Hotelling model. By setting up the utility of the shipper’s port selection, the equilibrium price, market share, and profit of duopoly ports in neighboring countries are analyzed under different conditions of cross-border land transportation and maritime transportation. It is found that the high cross-border transportation cost of the international land–sea transport corridor is not conducive to increasing the market share of the overseas oligopolistic ports in the region. If the maritime transportation cost of overseas oligopoly ports is too high compared with domestic oligopoly ports, it will offset the land transport advantages brought by international land–sea transport corridors. The findings in this paper could provide support for strategic decision making in port markets and cross-border transport corridor development.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Maritime Ports and Logistics · Economic Zones and Regional Development · Urban and Freight Transport Logistics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Transportation Engineering, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China

School of Transportation and Logistics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China

Funding

National Social Science Foundation of China · Major project of the Social Science Planning Fund of Liaoning Province · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Optimized Border System for Land-Based Transport10.1109/MITS.2022.3214114 ↗
2. Impact of the Primorsky International Transport Corridor on the Hinterland Competition between Ports in Northeast China and Russian Far East
3. Impacts of the New International Land–Sea Trade Corridor on the Freight Transport Structure in China, Central Asia, the ASEAN Countries and the EU
4. Relationships among Port Competition, Cooperation and Competitiveness: A Literature Review10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.01.014 ↗
5. A Literature Review of Port Competition Research10.1504/IJSTL.2017.086940 ↗
6. Huybrechts, M., Meersman, H., Van de Voorde, E., Van Hooydonk, E., Verbeke, A., and Winkelmans, W. (2002). Port Competitiveness: An Economic and Legal Analysis of the Factors Determining the Competitiveness of Seaports, De Boeck.
7. Huang, Z., Yang, Y., and Zhang, F. (2022). Configuration Analysis of Factors Influencing Port Competitiveness of Hinterland Cities under TOE Framework: Evidence from China. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 10.10.3390/jmse10101558 ↗
8. Inter-Port Price Competition in a Multi-Port Gateway Region10.1016/j.retrec.2022.101178 ↗
9. Yu, S., Gong, L., and Qi, M. (2022). Efficiency Analysis of the Coastal Port Group in the Yangtze River Delta. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 10.10.3390/jmse10111575 ↗
10. Port Competitiveness, Efficiency, and Supply Chains: A Literature Review10.5325/transportationj.58.1.0001 ↗
11. The Drivers of Port Competitiveness: A Critical Review10.1080/01441647.2016.1231232 ↗
12. Evaluation of Port Competitiveness along China’s “Belt and Road” Based on the Entropy-TOPSIS Method10.1038/s41598-023-42755-1 ↗
13. Zhong, H.L., Ou, Y.H., Chen, J.W., and Wan, Y.C. (2017, January 16–18). Empirical Study on Sustainable Competitiveness Evaluation of Guangzhou Port Based on Improved Matter-Element Model. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management, Dalian, China.
14. Evaluation Methods of Port Dominance: A Critical Review10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105954 ↗
15. Competitiveness Prioritisation of Container Ports in Asia under the Background of China’s Belt and Road Initiative10.1080/01441647.2018.1451407 ↗
16. Li, Z., Wang, X., Zheng, R., Na, S., and Liu, C. (2022). Evaluation Analysis of the Operational Efficiency and Total Factor Productivity of Container Terminals in China. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su142013007 ↗
17. Estimating Productivity Growth of Spanish Ports Using a Non-Radial, Non-Oriented Malmquist Index10.1504/IJSTL.2009.027532 ↗
18. Ben Mabrouk, M., Elmsalmi, M., Aljuaid, A.M., Hachicha, W., and Hammami, S. (2022). Joined Efficiency and Productivity Evaluation of Tunisian Commercial Seaports Using DEA-Based Approaches. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 10.10.3390/jmse10050626 ↗
19. Competition Dynamics between Container Ports in East Asia10.1016/j.tra.2005.03.001 ↗
20. A Comparative Benchmarking Analysis of Main Iberian Container Terminals: A DEA Approach10.1504/IJSTL.2009.027534 ↗
21. Li, H., Jiang, L.L., Liu, J.N., and Su, D.D. (2022). Research on the Evaluation of Logistics Efficiency in Chinese Coastal Ports Based on the Four-Stage DEA Model. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 10.10.3390/jmse10081147 ↗
22. How Smart Port Design Influences Port Efficiency—A DEA-Tobit Approach
23. Svanberg, M., Holm, H., and Cullinane, K. (2021). Assessing the Impact of Disruptive Events on Port Performance and Choice: The Case of Gothenburg. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 9.10.3390/jmse9020145 ↗
24. Corporatisation and Performance: A Literature Review and an Analysis of the Performance Effects of the Corporatisation of Port of Rotterdam Authority10.1080/01441647.2014.905650 ↗
25. Governance, Governance Models and Port Performance: A Systematic Review10.1080/01441647.2014.946458 ↗
26. Port Selection from a Hinterland Perspective10.1057/mel.2009.9 ↗
27. Port Selection Based on Customer Questionnaire: A Case Study of German Port Selection10.1186/s12544-019-0385-1 ↗
28. Port Selection by Container Ships: A Big AIS Data Analytics Approach
29. Pujats, K., Golias, M., and Konur, D. (2020). A Review of Game Theory Applications for Seaport Cooperation and Competition. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 8.10.3390/jmse8020100 ↗
30. Seaport Competition: Some Fundamental and Political Aspects10.1080/03088838100000022 ↗
31. Regional Container Port Competition in a Dual Gateway-Port System10.1007/s11518-015-5288-7 ↗
32. The Effect of Competition on Economic Rents in Seaports
33. Modeling the Effects of Competition on Seaport Terminal Awarding10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.04.007 ↗
34. Modelling Emission Control Taxes in Port Areas and Port Privatization Levels in Port Competition and Co-Operation Sub-Games10.1016/j.trd.2017.07.030 ↗
35. Hub Port Competition and Welfare Effects of Strategic Privatization10.1016/j.ecotra.2014.06.002 ↗