Study on the Influence of a Rigid Wall on Cavitation in Underwater Explosions Near the Free Surface
Source abstract
Abstract
A two-fluid, phase transition-based multiphase flow model is employed to simulate the dynamics of phase transition between liquid and vapor phases during shock wave and rarefaction wave propagation in underwater explosions. The aim is to understand the influence of a rigid wall on the cavitation evolution process and the cavitation collapse load, considering various charge quantities and water depths. The evolution of crucial physical qualities, such as the density, pressure, and the cavitation domain, within the flow field are analyzed and summarized. The presence of a rigid wall is found to significantly impact the cavitation evolution process in underwater explosions. It affects the shape, size, and dynamics of the cavitation domain, as well as the interaction between the explosion and the surrounding fluid. Specifically, the reflected wave on the wall influences the cavitation collapse load, leading to notable differences in the collapse time and collapse pressure compared to free-field conditions. Under different operating conditions, the size and position of the cavitation domain exhibit distinct changes. The proximity of the rigid wall results in unique patterns of cavitation domain evolution, which in turn lead to variations in the pressure distribution and the emergence of new cavitation regions. The findings of this study provide valuable insights into the behavior of cavitation and atomization induced by underwater explosions near the free surface. The understanding gained from these investigations can contribute to the development of effective safety measures and protective strategies in marine and underwater engineering applications. By accurately predicting and mitigating the effects of cavitation, it is possible to enhance the design and operation of underwater structures, ensuring their integrity and minimizing the potential risks associated with underwater explosions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena · Combustion and Detonation Processes · Energetic Materials and Combustion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
China Ship Scientific Research Center, Wuxi 214082, China
Taihu Laboratory of Deep-Sea Technological Science, Wuxi 214082, China
School of Medical Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Kedrinskii, V.K. (2005). Hydrodynamics of Explosion-Experiments and Models, Springer.
2. A numerical treatment for attached cavitation10.1115/1.2910321 ↗
3. A thermodynamically consistent model for cavitating flows of compressible fluids10.1016/S0020-7462(02)00046-X ↗
4. Multiphase phenomena in underwater explosion10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2014.05.008 ↗
5. Application of a one-fluid model for large scale homogeneous unsteady cavitation: The modified Schmidt model10.1016/j.compfluid.2005.05.006 ↗
6. Numerical study on strong nonlinear interactions between spark- generated underwater explosion bubbles and a free surface10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120506 ↗
7. An effective method for modeling the load of bubble jet in underwater explosion near the wall10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108408 ↗
8. Finite element analysis of shock-induced hull cavitation10.1016/0045-7825(84)90134-8 ↗
9. A spectral-element method for modeling cavitation in transient fluid-structure interaction10.1016/S0021-9991(02)00024-4 ↗
10. Sprague, M.A. (2002). Advanced Computational Techniques for the Analysis of 3-D Fluid-Structure Interaction with Cavitation. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Colorado at Boulder].
11. Stefan, S., and Austen, A. (2009, January 25–29). Fluid structure Interaction-preliminary assessment of LS-DYNA/USA acoustic shock methods. Proceedings of the 80th Shock and Vibration Symposium, San Diego, CA, USA.
12. Ranlet, D., Daddazio, R., and Weidlinger, A. (1996, January 18–22). A submerged shock response problem suitable for use as a benchmark. Proceedings of the 67th Shock and Vibration Symposium, Arlington, VA, USA.
13. Numerical simulation of underwater explosion cavitation characteristics based on phase transition model in compressible multicomponent fluids10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109934 ↗
14. Application of two-phase transition model in underwater explosion cavitation based on compressible multiphase flows10.1063/5.0077517 ↗
15. An interface capturing method for the simulation of multi-phase compressible flows10.1016/j.jcp.2010.06.025 ↗
16. Investigation of the shock wave propagation characteristics and cavitation effects of underwater explosion near boundaries10.1016/j.apor.2014.02.003 ↗
17. Cavity flow predictions based on the Euler equations10.1115/1.2910238 ↗
18. Numerical modeling of the thermodynamic effects of cavitation10.1115/1.2819150 ↗
19. Numerical simulation of underwater explosion near air-water free surface using a five-equation reduced model10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.10.003 ↗
20. Direct calculations of cavitating flows in fuel delivery pipe by the space-time CE/SE method
21. Underwater shock response analysis on a floating vessel10.1155/1998/378386 ↗
22. A fully compressible, two-dimensional model of small, high speed, cavitating nozzles10.1615/AtomizSpr.v9.i3.20 ↗
23. The merging of two gaseous bubbles with an application to underwater explosions10.1016/S0045-7930(02)00078-6 ↗
24. Isentropic one-fluid modelling of unsteady cavitating flow10.1016/j.jcp.2004.05.010 ↗
25. A unified theory for bubble dynamics10.1063/5.0145415 ↗
26. A mixture-energy-consistent six-equation two-phase numerical model for fluid with interfaces, cavitation and evaporation waves10.1016/j.jcp.2013.12.003 ↗
27. A numerical model for multiphase liquid-vapor-gas flows with interfaces and cavitation10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2019.01.010 ↗
28. A simple phase transition relaxation solver for liquid–vapor flows10.1002/fld.4282 ↗
29. A simple and fast phase transition relaxation solver for compressible multicomponent two-phase flows10.1016/j.compfluid.2017.03.022 ↗
30. A simple and effective five-equation two-phase numerical model for liquid-vapor phase transition in cavitating flows10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2020.103417 ↗
31. The Noble-Abel Stiffened-Gas equation of state10.1063/1.4945981 ↗