journal article·2024-02-22Open access

Finite Element Analysis of Mandibular Advancement Comparing Hunsuck/Epker and a Novel Modification of the Low Z Plasty Technique of BSSO

Sukumal Boonlue, Siripatra Patchanee, Samroeng Inglam, Narissaporn Chaiprakit

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 5

Abstract

This study analyzed the biomechanical behavior under simulated conditions between a novel modification of the Low Z plasty (NM-Low Z) technique and the conventional Hunsuck–Epker (HE) technique on mandibular advancement surgery. The NM-Low Z technique was developed with the purpose of reducing post-operative complications by facilitating the operative method of lower jaw surgery. The models were investigated under physiological muscular and occlusal loads at 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks post-operation. Finite element analysis was used to analyze stress distribution, elastic strain, and model displacement. Maximum equivalent von Mises stresses were observed on the fixation system and bone. The elastic strain at the fracture site represented the optimal bone-healing capacity. The NM-Low Z model showed lower stress than the HE model at the 2-week post-operation stage and onwards. The elastic strains observed in both models were situated within the normal range for bone healing. The ranges of displacement for the NM-Low Z model were less than those in the HE model. Based on the data sets studied, the biomechanical study of the NM-Low Z technique can be favorably compared to the conventional HE technique. The NM-Low Z technique promotes post-operation skeletal stability by lowering stress on fixation and bone, with less displacement of the segment during bone-healing periods.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Temporomandibular Joint Disorders

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Khlong Luang 12120, Pathum Thani, Thailand

Division of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Khlong Luang 12120, Pathum Thani, Thailand

Thammasat University Research Unit in Mineralized Tissue Reconstruction, Faculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Khlong Luang 12120, Pathum Thani, Thailand

Division of Oral Diagnostic Science and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Khlong Luang 12120, Pathum Thani, Thailand

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Skeletal Stability after Large Mandibular Advancement (>10 mm) with Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy and Skeletal Elastic Intermaxillary Fixation10.5037/jomr.2016.7205 ↗
2. Böckmann, R.A. (2017). Modification of the Mandibular Split Based on a Physical Model: Experimental Animal and Clinical Studies. [Ph.D. Thesis, Maastricht University].
3. Orthognathic surgery and a tale of how three procedures came to be: A letter to the next generations of surgeons10.1016/j.cps.2007.05.014 ↗
4. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy10.1055/s-0033-1357111 ↗
5. The modifications of the sagittal ramus split osteotomy: A literature review10.1097/GOX.0000000000000127 ↗
6. Risk factors for common complications associated with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: A literature review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.jcms.2016.04.023 ↗
7. A Surgeon-Friendly BSSO by the Novel Modification of Low Z Plasty: Approach Focus and Case Report: A Case Report
8. Finite element analysis between Hunsuck/Epker and novel modification of Low Z plasty technique of mandibular sagittal split osteotomy10.1177/09544119221082436 ↗
9. Three lateral osteotomy designs for bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: Biomechanical evaluation with three-dimensional finite element analysis10.1186/1746-160X-6-4 ↗
10. Impact of orthognathic surgery on quality of life: A comparison between orthodontics-first and surgery-first approaches10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.01.005 ↗
11. Thitiyuk, C., Patchanee, S., Klaisiri, A., and Chaiprakit, N. (2022). Comparison of Orthodontic First and Surgery First Approaches to Quality of Life in Orthognathic Surgery Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122312137 ↗
12. Skeletal stability following mandibular advancement: Is it influenced by the magnitude of advancement or changes of the mandibular plane angle?10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.3.152 ↗
13. Skeletal relapse after mandibular advancement and setback in single-jaw surgery10.1016/j.joms.2004.07.007 ↗
14. Long-Term Study of Relapse After Mandibular Orthognathic Surgery: Advancement Versus Setback10.1007/s12663-020-01445-5 ↗
15. Independent risk factors for long-term skeletal relapse after mandibular advancement with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy10.1016/j.ijom.2019.09.014 ↗
16. The role of muscular traction in the occurrence of skeletal relapse after advancement bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO): A systematic review10.1111/ocr.12488 ↗
17. Mechanisms of early skeletal release following surgical advancement of the mandible10.1016/S0007-117X(82)80035-8 ↗
18. The role of suprahyoid myotomy in surgical advancement of the mandible via sagittal split ramus osteotomies10.1016/0278-2391(82)90217-8 ↗
19. Mandibular advancement surgery in high-angle and low-angle class II patients: Different long-term skeletal responses10.1067/mod.2001.110983 ↗
20. Stress Pattern and Deformation in Mid-palatal Suture and Posterior Dentoalveolar Area With Two Different Types of Rapid Maxillary Expansion Appliances: A Finite Element Method Study10.1177/0301574220961748 ↗
21. Basic Knowledges of Finite Element Method and Application in Implant Dentistry
22. Three-dimensional finite element analysis used to compare methods of fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: Setback surgery-posterior loading10.1016/j.bjoms.2004.10.007 ↗
23. Applied mechanics of the Puricelli osteotomy: A linear elastic analysis with the finite element method10.1186/1746-160X-3-38 ↗
24. Skeletal stability after bilateral sagittal split advancement and setback osteotomy of the mandible with miniplate fixation10.1055/s-0033-1356763 ↗
25. Resistance and Stress Finite Element Analysis of Different Types of Fixation for Mandibular Orthognathic Surgery10.1590/0103-6440201600336 ↗
26. Anisotropic elasticity of cortical and cancellous bone in the posterior mandible increases peri-implant stress and strain under oblique loading10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120614.x ↗
27. Estimation of the maximum permissible intrusive force for intrusion of a canine tooth: One-dimensional finite element study10.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.298 ↗
28. Ghiasi, M.S., Chen, J.E., Rodriguez, E.K., Vaziri, A., and Nazarian, A. (2019). Computational modeling of human bone fracture healing affected by different conditions of initial healing stage. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 20.10.1186/s12891-019-2854-z ↗
29. Comparison of biophysical stimuli for mechano-regulation of tissue differentiation during fracture healing10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.01.037 ↗
30. Biomechanical analysis of a temporomandibular joint condylar prosthesis during various clenching tasks10.1016/j.jcms.2015.04.016 ↗
31. Bite forces in patients after treatment of mandibular angle fractures with miniplate osteosynthesis according to Champy10.1054/ijom.2002.0290 ↗
32. The comparison of three different fixation methods on bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy mandibular on a 3D of fully modelled mandible by the finite element method
33. Finite element analysis convergence curves10.1016/0168-874X(90)90003-W ↗
34. Parametric convergence sensitivity and validation of a finite element model of the human lumbar spine10.1080/10255842.2010.493517 ↗
35. Malocclusions resulting from loss of fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomies10.1016/j.joms.2009.06.022 ↗
36. Narayan, R. (2014). Rapid Prototyping of Biomaterials, Woodhead Publishing.
37. Bone resorption triggered by high radial stress: The mechanism of screw loosening in plate fixation of long bone fractures10.1002/jor.24286 ↗
38. A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff’s Law for clinicians
39. Evaluation of the Transverse Displacement of the Proximal Segment After Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy with Different Lingual Split Patterns and Advancement Amounts Using the Finite Element Method10.1016/j.joms.2016.07.011 ↗
40. Yield Strength Prediction of Titanium Alloys10.1007/s11837-015-1436-2 ↗
41. Factors affecting bone response around loaded titanium dental implants: A literature review
42. Bad splits in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis of reported risk factors10.1016/j.ijom.2016.02.011 ↗
43. Occurrence of a ‘bad’ split and success of initial mandibular healing: A review of 524 sagittal ramus osteotomies in 262 patients10.1016/j.ijom.2016.05.003 ↗
44. Use of a ‘low and short’ medial cut limits sagittal ramus osteotomy interferences10.1016/j.ijom.2021.02.021 ↗
45. Modified bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for correction of severe anterior open bite: Technical note and case report