Double-Constraint Fuzzy Clustering Algorithm
Source abstract
Abstract
Given a set of data objects, the fuzzy c-means (FCM) partitional clustering algorithm is favored due to easy implementation, rapid response, and feasible optimization. However, FCM fails to reflect either the importance degree of the individual data objects or that of the clusters. Numerous variants of FCM have been proposed to address these issues. However, most of them cannot effectively apply the available information on data objects or clusters. In this paper, a double-constraint fuzzy clustering algorithm is proposed to reflect the importance degrees of both individual data objects and clusters. By incorporating double constraints into each data object and cluster, the objective function of FCM is reformulated and its realization equation is mathematically conducted. Consequently, the clustering accuracy of FCM is improved by applying the available information on both data objects and clusters. Especially, the proposed algorithm effectively addresses the limitations inherent in the existing variants of FCM. The experimental results validate the effectiveness, implementation, and robustness of the new fuzzy clustering algorithm.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research · Data Management and Algorithms · Text and Document Classification Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. MacQueen, J.B. (1967). Proceedings of the Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Project Euclid.
2. A possibilistic clustering approach to novel fault detection and isolation10.1016/j.jprocont.2006.07.001 ↗
3. An unsupervised grid-based approach for clustering analysis10.1007/s11432-010-3112-z ↗
4. Bezdek, J.C. (1992). Fuzzy Models for Pattern Recognition, Plenum Press.
5. Automatic Fuzzy Clustering Framework for Image Segmentation10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2930030 ↗
6. Survey of clustering algorithms10.1109/TNN.2005.845141 ↗
7. Supervised fuzzy clustering for rule extraction10.1109/91.868948 ↗
8. An extensive comparative study of cluster validity indices10.1016/j.patcog.2012.07.021 ↗
9. Application of spherical fuzzy c-means algorithm in clustering Chinese documents
10. Semisupervised fuzzy clustering with fuzzy pairwise constraints10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3129848 ↗
11. A possibilistic approach to clustering10.1109/91.227387 ↗
12. Conditional fuzzy c-means10.1016/0167-8655(96)00027-X ↗
13. Yu, J. (2003, January 18–20). General c-means clustering model and its applications. Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Madison, WI, USA.
14. Automated variable weighting in k-means type clustering10.1109/TPAMI.2005.95 ↗
15. Adaptive fuzzy clustering
16. Adaptive morphological reconstruction for seeded image segmentation10.1109/TIP.2019.2920514 ↗
17. Pairwise constraints-based semi-supervised fuzzy clustering with multi-manifold regularization10.1016/j.ins.2023.118994 ↗
18. Dynamic fuzzy clustering using fuzzy cluster loading10.1080/03081070500422620 ↗
19. A note on constrained k-means algorithms10.1016/S0031-3203(99)00057-6 ↗
20. Fuzzy graph clustering10.1016/j.ins.2021.04.058 ↗
21. Kernelized fuzzy attribute C-means clustering algorithm10.1016/j.fss.2008.03.018 ↗
22. A new validity index for evaluating the clustering results by partitional clustering algorithms10.1007/s00500-014-1577-1 ↗
23. Comparing fuzzy, probabilistic, and possibilistic partitions using the earth mover’s distance10.1109/TFUZZ.2012.2230181 ↗
24. Bayesian fuzzy clustering10.1109/TFUZZ.2014.2370676 ↗
25. Carter, M.W., and Price, C.C. (2000). Operations Research, CRC Press Inc.
26. (2021, October 12). UCI Dataset. Available online: http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets.php.
27. Li, Q., Yue, S.H., and Wang, Y.R. (2020). Boundary matching and interior connectivity-based cluster validity analysis. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10041337 ↗