journal article·2024-02-11Open access

A Multi-Agent Driving-Simulation Approach for Characterizing Hazardous Vehicle Interactions between Autonomous Vehicles and Manual Vehicles

Aram Jung, Young Jo, Cheol Oh, Jaehong Park, Dukgeun Yun

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 4

Abstract

The advent of autonomous vehicles (AVs) in the traffic stream is expected to innovatively prevent crashes resulting from human errors in manually driven vehicles (MVs). However, substantial safety benefits due to AVs are not achievable quickly because the mixed-traffic conditions in which AVs and MVs coexist in the current road infrastructure will continue for a considerably long period of time. The purpose of this study is to develop a methodology to evaluate the driving safety of mixed car-following situations between AVs and MVs on freeways based on a multi-agent driving-simulation (MADS) technique. Evaluation results were used to answer the question ‘What road condition would make the mixed car-following situations hazardous?’ Three safety indicators, including the acceleration noise, the standard deviation of the lane position, and the headway, were used to characterize the maneuvering behavior of the mixed car-following pairs in terms of driving safety. It was found that the inter-vehicle safety of mixed pairs was poor when they drove on a road section with a horizontal curve length of 1000 m and downhill slope of 1% or 3%. A set of road sections were identified, using the proposed evaluation method, as hazardous conditions for mixed car-following pairs consisting of AVs and MVs. The outcome of this study will be useful for supporting the establishment of safer road environments and developing novel V2X-based trafficsafetyinformation content that enables the enhancement of mixed-traffic safety.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Traffic control and management · Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety · Traffic and Road Safety

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Smart City Engineering, Hanyang University Erica Campus, 55 Hanyangdaehak-ro, Sangnok-gu, Ansan 15588, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea

Department of Road and Traffic Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, (Daehwa-Dong) 283, Goyangdae-ro, Ilsanseo-gu, Goyang 10223, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea

Department of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Hanyang University Erica Campus, 55 Hanyangdaehak-ro, Sangnok-gu, Ansan 15588, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea

Department of Highway & Transportation Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, (Daehwa-Dong) 283, Goyangdae-ro, Ilsanseo-gu, Goyang 10223, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea

Funding

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Korea Expressway Corporation (2020). Korea’s Freeway Crash Database, Korea Expressway Corporation.
2. Crash comparison of autonomous and conventional vehicles using pre-crash scenario typology10.1016/j.aap.2021.106281 ↗
3. How many crashes can connected vehicle and automated vehicle technologies prevent: A meta-analysis10.1016/j.aap.2019.105299 ↗
4. Horizontal Curve Driving Performance and Safety Affected by Road Geometry and Lead Vehicle10.1177/1541931213601893 ↗
5. Safety Evaluation of Highway Geometric Design Criteria in Horizontal Curves at Downgrades
6. Driving aggressiveness management policy to enhance the performance of mixed traffic conditions in automated driving environment10.1016/j.tra.2019.01.010 ↗
7. Stability and safety evaluation of mixed traffic flow with connected automated vehicles on expressways10.1016/j.jsr.2020.09.012 ↗
8. Guériau, M., and Dusparic, I. (2020, January 20–23). Quantifying the impact of connected and autonomous vehicles on traffic efficiency and safety in mixed traffic. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Rhodes, Greece.10.1109/ITSC45102.2020.9294174 ↗
9. Investigating the safety and operational benefits of mixed traffic environments with different automated vehicle market penetration rates in the proximity of a driveway on an urban arterial10.1016/j.aap.2021.105982 ↗
10. Hou, G. (2023). Evaluating Efficiency and Safety of Mixed Traffic with Connected and Autonomous Vehicles in Adverse Weather. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15043138 ↗
11. Integration of automated vehicles in mixed traffic: Evaluating changes in performance of following human-driven vehicles10.1016/j.aap.2021.106006 ↗
12. Park, S., and Ritchie, S.G. (2004, January 11–15). Exploring the relationship between freeway speed variance, lane changing and vehicle heterogeneity. Proceedings of the 83rd Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, USA.
13. Driving next to automated vehicle platoons: How do short time headways influence non-platoon drivers’ longitudinal control?10.1016/j.trf.2014.03.003 ↗
14. Modeling the Impact of Spatial Relationships on Horizontal Curve safety10.1016/j.aap.2011.07.018 ↗
15. Evaluation of Road Design Elements Affecting Lateral Driving Safety under High-Speed Driving Conditions
16. Safety Effects of Horizontal Curve and Grade Combinations on Rural Two-Lane Highways10.3141/2398-05 ↗
17. Risk Assessment of Horizontal Curves Based on Lateral Acceleration Index: A Driving Simulator-Based Study10.1007/s40890-020-00111-2 ↗
18. Quantifying the Safety Effects of Horizontal Curves on Two-way, Two-lane Rural Roads10.1016/j.aap.2016.03.024 ↗
19. Safety evaluation of connected and automated vehicles in mixed traffic with conventional vehicles at intersections10.1080/15472450.2020.1834392 ↗
20. Deluka Tibljaš, A., Giuffrè, T., Surdonja, S., and Trubia, S. (2018). Introduction of autonomous vehicles: Roundabouts design and safety performance evaluation. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10041060 ↗
21. Studying the safety impact of autonomous vehicles using simulation-based surrogate safety measures10.1155/2018/6135183 ↗
22. A decision-making model for autonomous vehicles at urban intersections based on conflict resolution
23. Deterministic promotion reinforcement learning applied to longitudinal velocity control for automated vehicles10.1109/TVT.2019.2955959 ↗
24. Lillicrap, T.P., Hunt, J.J., Pritzel, A., Heess, N.M., Erez, T., Tassa, Y., Silver, D., and Wierstra, D. (2016, January 2–4). Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning. Proceedings of the ICLR 2016, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
25. A Survey of Motion Planning and Control Techniques for Self-Driving Urban Vehicles10.1109/TIV.2016.2578706 ↗
26. Lee, J.W., and Litkouhi, B.A.
27. Suitability Evaluation for Simulated Maneuvering of Autonomous Vehicles10.12815/kits.2022.21.2.183 ↗
28. Korean Society of Civil Engineering, and Korean Association of Professional Road & Airport Engineers (2020). Explanation of the Rules on the Standards of Structural Facilities in Roads, KSCE PRESS.
29. A Multi-Agent Driving Simulation Approach for Evaluating the Safety Benefits of Connected Vehicles10.1109/TITS.2020.3045675 ↗
30. Understanding the discretionary lane-changing behaviour in the connected environment10.1016/j.aap.2020.105463 ↗
31. The effect of gender, occupation and experience on behavior while driving on a freeway deceleration lane based on field operational test data10.1016/j.aap.2018.07.034 ↗
32. Study of automated shuttle interactions in city traffic using surrogate measures of safety10.1016/j.trc.2021.103465 ↗
33. Chen, Y., Fu, R., Xu, Q., and Yuan, W. (2020). Mobile Phone Use in a Car-Following Situation: Impact on Time Headway and Effectiveness of Driver’s Rear-End Risk Compensation Behavior via a Driving Simulator Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.10.3390/ijerph17041328 ↗
34. A comparison of headway and time to collision as safety indicators10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00022-2 ↗