journal article·2024-02-01Open access

Numerical Simulation Research on Aerodynamic Characteristics during Take-Off Phase in Ski Jumping

Qi Hu, Weidi Tang, Yu Liu

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 3

Abstract

In view of the inability to directly and accurately obtain an athlete’s aerodynamic force during the take-off phase through the wind tunnel test, the athlete’s aerodynamic force and surrounding flow field form under different take-off postures are obtained through numerical simulation research, and the effects of different take-off modes on the aerodynamic characteristics during take-off in ski jumping are discussed. The multi-body system composed of the athlete and skis was selected as the research object. By using a partially averaged Navier–Stokes (PANS) turbulence model and a 3D numerical simulation of computational fluid dynamics (CFD), the aerodynamic characteristics of the athlete under different take-off postures were predicted. The take-off modes include the knee-push-hip (KPH) mode and hip-drive-knee (HDK) mode, and the hip joint angle of the HDK mode is significantly greater than that of the KPH mode. First, the aerodynamic force ratio of the athlete’s torso and legs is obviously large. Although the aerodynamic forces of arms themselves are not obvious, they have a great impact on the overall aerodynamic characteristics of the athlete, so the posture of the arms cannot be ignored. The total drag and moment of the HDK mode are significantly higher than that of the KPH mode, and the lift-to-drag ratio of the HDK mode is significantly lower than that of the KPH mode. At first, the total lift of the HDK mode is higher than that of the KPH mode, but in the last attitude, the total lift of the HDK mode does not rise but fall, and finally, the total lift of the HDK mode is lower than that of the KPH mode. The aerodynamic characteristics change dramatically during the take-off phase, and the aerodynamic characteristics of the two take-off modes are quite different, and these changes and differences are difficult to observe during real training and at the competition site. The KPH mode has an obvious aerodynamic advantage over the HDK mode. During the take-off process, the athlete should increase the force generated by the knee joint extension and appropriately reduce the speed of the hip joint extension, control the using force order of the lower limb joints, and push the hip joint extension by the knee joint extension in order to avoid issues, such as the hip joint angle being too large, the hip joint extension angle being too fast, the center of gravity being too far back, and other problems. Studying the aerodynamic characteristics during the take-off phase provides valuable insights for athletes to achieve favorable flight postures after take-off, offering scientific guidance to improve their training strategies and enhance their competitive performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Winter Sports Injuries and Performance · Cryospheric studies and observations · Adventure Sports and Sensation Seeking

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Exercise and Health, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China

China Institute of Sport Science, Beijing 100061, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · National key research and development plan project of China

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. A Review of Wind Tunnel Experimental Research on Aerodynamic Drag Reduction in Winter Sports
2. Virmavirta, M. (2016). The Engineering Approach to Winter Sports, Braghin. [6th ed.].
3. Elfmark, O., and Ettema, G. (2021). Aerodynamic investigation of the inrun position in Ski jumping. Sports Biomech., 19.10.1080/14763141.2020.1871503 ↗
4. Effects of Athlete’s Posture on Aerodynamic Characteristics during Flight in Ski Jumping
5. Numerical investigation of the early flight phase in ski-jumping10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.05.013 ↗
6. High-speed video image analysis of ski jumping flight posture10.1007/s12283-014-0157-z ↗
7. Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation and Optimization of In-run Stage in Ski-Jumping
8. Aerodynamic analysis on postures of ski jumpers during flight using computational fluid dynamics10.2322/tjsass.58.204 ↗
9. Numerical Study of the Aerodynamical Parameters During the Flying Stage of Ski Jumping
10. Optimization of ski jumper’s posture considering lift-to-drag ratio and stability10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.05.036 ↗
11. On CFD simulation of ski jumping10.1007/978-3-642-04466-3_3 ↗
12. Aerodynamics of ski jumping: Experiments and CFD simulations10.1007/s00348-006-0213-y ↗
13. Take-off analysis of the Olympic ski jumping competition (HS-106 m)10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.02.026 ↗
14. Measurements of the take-off forces in ski-jumping Part I and II10.1111/j.1600-0838.1993.tb00387.x ↗
15. Take-off aerodynamics in ski jumping10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00218-9 ↗
16. Virmavirta, M. (2017). Handbook of Human Motion, Springer. [1st ed.].
17. Ski jumping take-off in a wind tunnel with skis10.1123/jab.27.4.375 ↗
18. Performance factors in ski jumping10.1016/S0021-9290(06)83690-0 ↗
19. Experimental study on the initial attitude during Flight in Ski Jumping
20. Effects of Movement and Postures on Aerodynamic Drag during Ski Jumping In-Run and Take-off Phases in Nordic Combined Athletes
21. Analysis of Take-off Factors Affecting the Flying Distance of Chinese Elite Male Ski Jumpers
22. A systematic review of research on the biomechanics of take-off and early flight of ski jumping
23. A nonlinear partially-averaged Namer-Stokes model for turbulence flow simulations
24. Effect of posture on the aerodynamic characteristics during take-off in ski jumping10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.09.037 ↗
25. The importance of being light: Aerodynamic forces and weight in ski jumping10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00066-0 ↗
26. Biomechanics research in ski jumping: 1991–200610.1080/14763140701687560 ↗