Sensitivity Analysis of Wellbore Mud Pressure towards Anisotropic Shale Properties, Pore Fluid Pressure and Far Field Stresses
Source abstract
Abstract
The paper investigates the mud pressure to maintain the stability of wellbores drilled in transversely isotropic shale through sensitivity analyses, carried out with analytical and numerical modeling (FLAC). To this end, we interpreted the anisotropic strength of the Tournemire shale with the Weakness Plane Model (WPM) and the modified Hoek–Brown criterion (HBm). The sensitivity analyses of synthetic case studies indicated a different trend in mud pressure for the two criteria. In some cases, the WPM predicts mud pressures higher than those predicted by the HBm and vice versa. The mud pressures predicted by the HBm resulted in being more sensitive to the increase in the anisotropy of the far field stresses for all the inclinations of the weakness planes. In this context, the WPM predicts some anomalous low mud pressures in a wide range of inclinations of the weak planes. The change in the frictional component of strength decreases with an increase in the pore fluid pressure for both criteria. The mud pressure predicted by the WPM resulted in being more sensitive to the change in frictional strength. The change in trend of the two criteria with change in input data suggests caution in the “a priori” selection of the strength criterion. A simple solution is proposed to predict a safe and reliable mud pressure with a small number of lab tests.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Drilling and Well Engineering · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Environment, Land and Infrastructure Engineering (DIATI), Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy
Department of Mining Engineering, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China
Funding
Nationally-sponsored Graduate Program of China for High-level Universities
References (68)
Show source-provided references
1. Boggs, S. (2009). Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511626487 ↗
2. Carey, J.W., and Torsæter, M. (2019). Shale: Subsurface Science and Engineering, John Wiley & Sons.
3. Quantitative determination of the mechanical properties of shales10.2118/18024-PA ↗
4. Peter, A., Yang, D., Eshiet, K.I.I.I., and Sheng, Y. (2022). A Review of the Studies on CO2–Brine–Rock Interaction in Geological Storage Process. Geosciences, 12.10.3390/geosciences12040168 ↗
5. VEM application to geomechanical simulations of an Italian Adriatic offshore gas storage scenario
6. Deformation behavior of a regional shale formation from integrated laboratory and well data analysis: Insights for underground fluid storage in northern Italy10.1016/j.geoen.2023.212109 ↗
7. How underground systems can contribute to meet the challenges of energy transition
8. Pašić, B., Gaurina-Međimurec, N., Mijić, P., and Medved, I. (2020). Experimental research of shale pellet swelling in nano-based drilling muds. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13236246 ↗
9. Reservoir wellbore stability analysis and weak zones identification using the 1d mem, swelling tests and ucs: A case study from mumbai offshore, India10.1007/s13369-021-05530-w ↗
10. Enhancing the stability of shale in water-based fluid with polyethylene glycol/nanosilica composite grafted with sodium dodecyl sulfate10.1007/s12517-023-11653-1 ↗
11. Study on Wellbore Stability and Failure Regions of Shale considering the Anisotropy of Wellbore Seepage
12. Fracture-initiation pressure model of inclined wells in transversely isotropic formation with anisotropic tensile strength10.1016/j.ijrmms.2022.105235 ↗
13. Influence of the weakening effect of drilling fluid on wellbore stability in anisotropic shale formation10.3389/fphy.2021.745075 ↗
14. Ding, L., Wang, Z., Lv, J., Wang, Y., and Liu, B. (2021). A New Model for Real-Time Prediction of Wellbore Stability Considering Elastic and Strength Anisotropy of Bedding Formation. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15010251 ↗
15. Shang, X., and Zhang, Z. (2020). Elastic-plastic-damaged zones around a deep circular wellbore under non-uniform loading. Symmetry, 12.10.3390/sym12020323 ↗
16. Medved, I., Gaurina-Međimurec, N., Pašić, B., and Mijić, P. (2022). Green approach in water-based drilling mud design to increase wellbore stability. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12115348 ↗
17. Mehrabian, A., Nguyen, V.X., and Abousleiman, Y.N. (2019). Shale: Subsurface Science and Engineering, John Wiley & Sons.
18. Combined Effect of Pore Water Overpressure, Far-Field Stresses, and Strength Parameters in Wellbore Stability10.3389/feart.2022.860818 ↗
19. Basu, S., Jones, A., and Mahzari, P. (2020). Best practices for shale core handling: Transportation, sampling and storage for conduction of analyses. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 8.10.3390/jmse8020136 ↗
20. Laboratory characterisation of shale properties10.1016/j.petrol.2012.01.023 ↗
21. Deformation and yield in high porosity outcrop chalk10.1016/S1464-1895(01)00022-9 ↗
22. Abousleiman, Y., Tran, M., Hoang, S., Bobko, C., Ortega, A., and Ulm, F.J. (2007). SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition?, SPE.
23. Woehrl, B., Wessling, S., Bartetzko, A., Pei, J., and Renner, J. (2010). ARMA US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, ARMA.
24. Mandal, P.P., Essa, I., Saha, S., and Rezaee, R. (2021, January 15–20). Multi-Purpose Utility of Constructing 3D Static Geomechanical Model in the Ichthys Field, Browse Basin. Proceedings of the Australian Exploration Geoscience Conference AEGC, Brisbane, Australia.
25. Empirical relations between rock strength and physical properties in sedimentary rocks10.1016/j.petrol.2006.01.003 ↗
26. Khaksar, A., Taylor, P.G., Fang, Z., Kayes, T., Salazar, A., and Rahman, K. (2009). SPE Europec featured at EAGE Conference and Exhibition?, SPE.
27. Zhang, J.J. (2019). Applied Petroleum Geomechanics, Imprint of Elsevier.
28. Machine learning approach to model rock strength: Prediction and variable selection with aid of log data10.1007/s00603-020-02184-2 ↗
29. Estimating the friction angle of black shale core specimens with hybrid-ANN approaches10.1016/j.measurement.2019.06.007 ↗
30. Estimating Mechanical Properties of Shale From Empirical Correlations10.2118/56017-PA ↗
31. On the physical and chemical stability of shales10.1016/S0920-4105(03)00034-2 ↗
32. Water-weakening behavior of Hawkesbury sandstone in brittle regime10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.05.015 ↗
33. Energy evolution and water immersion-induced weakening in sandstone roof of coal mines10.1007/s40789-022-00529-6 ↗
34. Advanced developments in low-toxic and environmentally friendly shale inhibitor: A review10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109578 ↗
35. Experimental study of the influence of the degree of saturation on physical and mechanical properties in Tournemire shale (France)10.1016/j.clay.2003.12.032 ↗
36. Anisotropic wellbore stability analysis: Impact on failure prediction10.1007/s00603-020-02283-0 ↗
37. Effects of deformation and strength anisotropy on borehole failures in saturated shales
38. Influence of pore pressure on the drilling response in low-permeability shear-dilatant rocks10.1016/S1365-1609(00)00050-2 ↗
39. Combined effect of anisotropy and uncertainty on the safe mud pressure window of horizontal wellbore drilled in anisotropic saturated rock10.1016/j.ijrmms.2022.105061 ↗
40. Laboratory investigation on the mechanical behaviour of Tournemire argillite10.1139/cgj-2013-0122 ↗
41. Shear failure of anisotropic rocks10.1017/S0016756800061100 ↗
42. Empirical strength criterion for rock masses
43. The Hoek–Brown failure criterion and GSI–2018 edition10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.08.001 ↗
44. The Shearing Resistance of Saturated Soils and the Angle between the Planes of Shear
45. Fundamentals of Poroelasticity
46. Fjaer, E., Holt, R.M., Raaen, A.M., Risnes, R., and Horsrud, P. (2008). Petroleum Related Rock Mechanics, Elsevier. [2nd ed.].
47. Brady, B., and Brown, E. (2004). Rock Mechanics for Underground Mining, Kluwer academic Publishers.
48. An experimental investigation of the failure mechanism of simulated transversely isotropic rocks10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.03.011 ↗
49. Hoek, E., and Brown, E.T. (1980). Underground Excavations in Rock, CRC Press.
50. A failure criterion for transversely isotropic rocks10.1016/S1365-1609(01)00007-7 ↗
51. Effect of transverse anisotropy on the Hoek–Brown strength parameter ‘mi’ for intact rocks10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.04.004 ↗
52. Deangeli, C., and Omwanghe, O.O. (2018). Prediction of mud pressures for the stability of wellbores drilled in transversely isotropic rocks. Energies, 11.10.3390/en11081944 ↗
53. Analysis of the Stability of Openings Excavated in Anisotropic Rocks
54. Parkash, D., and Deangeli, C. (2019, January 18–19). Wellbore stability analysis in anisotropic shale formations. Proceedings of the Society of Petroleum Engineers—SPE/PAPG Pakistan Section Annual Technical Symposium and Exhibition 2019, PATS 2019, Islamabad, Pakistan.10.2118/201183-MS ↗
55. Fracture pressure prediction for layered formations with anisotropic rock strengths10.1016/j.jngse.2017.01.002 ↗
56. Fracture pressure model for inclined wells in layered formations with anisotropic rock strengths10.1016/j.petrol.2016.10.050 ↗
57. Ma, T., Peng, N., Zhu, Z., Zhang, Q., Yang, C., and Zhao, J. (2018). Brazilian Tensile Strength of Anisotropic Rocks: Review and New Insights. Energies, 11.10.3390/en11020304 ↗
58. Integrated unconventional gas evaluation workflow: From anisotropic geomechanical modelling to completion design
59. Deangeli, C. (2021). Failure in the tension zone around a circular tunnel excavated in saturated porous rock. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11188384 ↗
60. A review of the tensile strength of rock: Concepts and testing10.1007/s10706-014-9732-0 ↗
61. Hoek, E. (2006). Practical Rock Engineering, Rocscience Inc.
62. Estimating Mohr-Coulomb friction and cohesion values from the Hoek-Brown failure criterion10.1016/0148-9062(90)94333-O ↗
63. A model for analysis of wellbore stability considering the effects of weak bedding planes10.1016/j.jngse.2015.09.053 ↗
64. Risk-controlled wellbore stability analysis in anisotropic formations10.1016/j.petrol.2015.08.004 ↗
65. Influence of multi-planes of weakness on unstable zones near wellbore wall in a fractured formation10.1016/j.jngse.2021.104026 ↗
66. Wellbore stability analysis of inclined wells in transversely isotropic formations accounting for hydraulic-mechanical coupling10.1016/j.geoen.2023.211615 ↗
67. Wellbore stability and failure regions analysis of shale formation accounting for weak bedding planes in ordos basin10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103258 ↗
68. Wellbore stability analysis in transverse isotropic shales with anisotropic failure criteria10.1016/j.petrol.2019.01.092 ↗