journal article·2023-12-19Open access

Towards Lunar In-Situ Resource Utilization Based Subtractive Manufacturing

André Seidel, Uwe Teicher, Steffen Ihlenfeldt, Konstantin Sauer, Florian Morczinek, Martin Dix, Rick Niebergall, Bernhard Durschang, Stefan Linke

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 1

Abstract

In recent years, space agencies, such as the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and European Space Agency (ESA), have expanded their research activities in the field of manufacturing in space. These measures serve to reduce limitations and costs through fairing size, launch mass capabilities or logistic missions. The objective, in turn, is to develop technologies and processes that enable on-demand manufacturing for long-term space missions and on other celestial bodies. Within these research activities, in-situ resource utilization (ISRU) and recycling are major topics to exploit local resources and save transport capacity and, therefore, costs. On the other hand, it is important to carefully consider which items can be brought and which must be manufactured on the Moon. Consequently, on-demand needs in future space missions are considered regarding frequency, raw material and required manufacturing processes according to investigations by ESA and NASA. In conclusion, manufacturing in space state-of-the-art shows a strong focus on additive processes, primarily considering semicrystalline or amorphous plastics. The subtractive processing of metallic or ceramic materials, in turn, currently represents a research gap. Consequently, an approach for in-situ resource utilization-based subtractive manufacturing in space is presented to supplement the existing processes. The latter uses a high-pressure jet of water, with regolith simulate as abrasive in suspension, being directed at the workpiece, which is moved to separate metal and glass. Proof-of-concept results are presented, including suitable process windows, achieved cutting geometries, as well as the effects of parameter variations on the system technology and consumables used. The focus of the investigations supplements the general requirements for the design of machine tools for space applications with inertial process-specific boundary conditions as a step towards higher technology maturity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Planetary Science and Exploration · Space Exploration and Technology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Taskforce Space Technology, Fraunhofer IWU, 01187 Dresden, Germany

Group Self-Optimizing Manufacturing Processes, Fraunhofer IWU, 01187 Dresden, Germany

Scientific Field Production Systems and Factory Automation, Fraunhofer IWU, 09126 Chemnitz, Germany

Chair of Machine Tools Development and Adaptive Controls, TU Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany

Professorship Production Systems and Processes, TU Chemnitz, 09111 Chemnitz, Germany

Scientific Field Process Technology, Fraunhofer IWU, 09126 Chemnitz, Germany

Glass Technology, Fraunhofer Institute for Silicate Research ISC, 97082 Würzburg, Germany

Chair of Space Technology, TU Berlin, 10587 Berlin, Germany

Funding

Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology IWU · TU Chemnitz · Fraunhofer Institute for Silicate Research ISC · TU Berlin · Saxon state parliament

References (91)

Show source-provided references
1. Prater, T., Werkheiser, M.J., Ledbetter, F., and Morgan, K. (2018, January 17–19). In-Space Manufacturing at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center: A Portfolio of Fabrication and Recycling Technology Development for the International Space Station. Proceedings of the 2018 AIAA SPACE and Astronautics Forum and Exposition, Orlando, FL, USA.10.2514/6.2018-5364 ↗
2. Advanced manufacturing for space applications10.1007/s12567-022-00477-6 ↗
3. Owens, A., and de Weck, O. (2016, January 13–16). Systems Analysis of In-Space Manufacturing Applications for the International Space Station and the Evolvable Mars Campaign. Proceedings of the AIAA SPACE 2016, Long Beach, CA, USA.10.2514/6.2016-5394 ↗
4. Venditti, B., and Parker, S. (2023, December 15). The Cost of Space Flight before and after SpaceX. Available online: https://www.visualcapitalist.com/the-cost-of-space-flight/.
5. (2023, April 25). Arianespace Service & Aolutions, Soyuz User’s Manual Issue 2 Revision 0. Available online: https://www.arianespace.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Soyuz-Users-Manual-March-2012.pdf.
6. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) (2023, April 25). SATURN V FLIGHT MANUAL: SA 507, Available online: https://history.nasa.gov/afj/ap12fj/pdf/a12_sa507-flightmanual.pdf.
7. Gatland, K., Hewish, M., and Wright, P. (1979). The Space Shuttle Handbook, The Hamlyn Publishing Group Ltd.
8. China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology (2023, April 25). LM-3B USER’S MANUAL. Available online: https://www.mach5lowdown.com/wp-content/uploads/PUG/LM-3B-User-Manual-v1999.pdf.
9. United Launch Alliance (2023, April 25). DELTA IV HEAVY. Available online: https://www.ulalaunch.com/docs/default-source/rockets/delta-iv-heavy-cutaway.pdf.
10. International Launch Services (2023, April 25). Angara 1.2 FLIGHT-PROVEN LAUNCH VEHICLE. Available online: https://www.ilslaunch.com/launch-vehicle/angara-1-2/.
11. (2023, April 25). SpaceX, FALCON USER’S GUIDE. Available online: https://www.spacex.com/media/falcon-users-guide-2021-09.pdf.
12. (2023, April 25). SpaceX, STARSHIP USERS GUIDE: REVISION 1.0 March 2020. Available online: https://www.spacex.com/media/starship_users_guide_v1.pdf.
13. Towards out of earth manufacturing: Overview of the ESA materials and processes activities on manufacturing in space10.1007/s12567-022-00428-1 ↗
14. Del Bianco, M., Lanciano, O., Bertacin, R., Piccirillo, S., Paillet, A., Boutte, P., Tan, E., Picard, M., Floyd, M., and On, M. (2023, December 15). IN-SITU RESOURCE UTILIZATION GAP ASSESSMENT REPORT. Available online: https://www.globalspaceexploration.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/ISECG-ISRU-Technology-Gap-Assessment-Report-Apr-2021.pdf.
15. A brief review of chemical and mineralogical resources on the Moon and likely initial in situ resource utilization (ISRU) applications10.1016/j.pss.2012.08.012 ↗
16. Sanders, G. (2000). ISRU: An Overview of NASA’s Current Development Activities and Long-Term Goals.10.2514/6.2000-1062 ↗
17. Nakamura, T., and Smith, B. (September, January 30). Solar Thermal Power System for Lunar ISRU Applications: Result of ISRU Analog Test, Mauna Kea, HI. Proceedings of the AIAA SPACE 2010 Conference & Exposition, Anaheim, CA, USA.10.2514/6.2010-8902 ↗
18. Sanders, G., Larson, W., Sacksteder, K., and Mclemore, C. (2008, January 9–11). NASA In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) Project: Development and Implementation. Proceedings of the AIAA SPACE 2008 Conference & Exposition, San Diego, CA, USA.10.2514/6.2008-7853 ↗
19. Froehlich, A. (2021). Assessing a Mars Agreement Including Human Settlements, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-65013-1 ↗
20. Belvin, W.K., Doggett, W.R., Watson, J.J., Dorsey, J.T., Warren, J.E., Jones, T.C., Komendera, E.E., Mann, T., and Bowman, L.M. (2016, January 4–8). In-Space Structural Assembly: Applications and Technology. Proceedings of the 3rd AIAA Spacecraft Structures Conference, San Diego, CA, USA.10.2514/6.2016-2163 ↗
21. ISRU technology deployment at a lunar outpost in 2040: A Delphi survey10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.01.009 ↗
22. Sanders, G., Kleinheinz, J., and Linne, D. (2022). NASA Plans for In Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) Development, Demonstration, and Implementation.
23. Global survey of lunar regolith depths from LROC images10.1016/j.icarus.2011.07.017 ↗
24. Two-Dimensional Laser Melting of Lunar Regolith Simulant Using the MOONRISE Payload on a Mobile Manipulator10.1089/3dp.2020.0323 ↗
25. A review towards the design of extraterrestrial structures: From regolith to human outposts10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.05.038 ↗
26. Building components for an outpost on the Lunar soil by means of a novel 3D printing technology10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.07.034 ↗
27. The economics of moon mining10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.01.042 ↗
28. Design and Construction of Shielded Lunar Outpost10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(1994)7:4(417) ↗
29. Proving the viability of an electrochemical process for the simultaneous extraction of oxygen and production of metal alloys from lunar regolith10.1016/j.pss.2019.104748 ↗
30. Jolliff, B.L., Wieczorek, M.A., Shearer, C.K., and Neal, C.R. (2006). New Views of the Moon, De Gruyter.10.1515/9781501509537 ↗
31. Lunar sourcebook—A user’s guide to the moon10.1016/0031-9201(92)90060-9 ↗
32. The Lunar Highland Crust: The Origin of the MG Suite
33. Sebastian, U. (2014). Gesteinskunde: Ein Leitfaden für Einsteiger und Anwender, 3., Überarb. und Aktualisierte Aufl., Springer Spektrum.10.1007/978-3-642-41757-3_1 ↗
34. Taylor, S.R. (2016). Lunar Science: Scientific Results and Insights from the Lunar Samples, Elsevier Science.
35. Lunar polar water resource exploration—Examination of the lunar cold trap reservoir system model and introduction of play-based exploration (PBE) techniques10.1016/j.pss.2019.104742 ↗
36. Culler, J. (2023, May 11). Ice Confirmed at the Moon’s Poles, Available online: https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/ice-confirmed-at-the-moons-poles.
37. Commercial lunar propellant architecture: A collaborative study of lunar propellant production10.1016/j.reach.2019.100026 ↗
38. Robert, P.M. (2022). Lunar Base Construction Planning, Earth and Space.
39. Sgambati, A., Berg, M., and Makaya, A. (2023, December 15). lUnaR Base Additive maNufacturing (URBAN) Executive Summary Report. Available online: https://nebula.esa.int/sites/default/files/neb_study/2507/C4000122380ExS.pdf.
40. Sustainable challenges on the moon10.1016/j.cogsc.2017.10.002 ↗
41. Uzo-Okoro, E. (2023, December 15). IN-SPACE SERVICING, ASSEMBLY, AND MANUFACTURING NATIONAL STRATEGY: Product of the IN-SPACE SERVICING, ASSEMBLY, AND MANUFACTURING INTERAGENCY WORKING GROUP of the NATIONAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL, Available online: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/04-2022-ISAM-National-Strategy-Final.pdf.
42. Willcoxon, R., Thronson, H., Varsi, G., Mueller, R., Regenie, V., Inman, T., Crooke, J., and Coulter, D. (2013). NASA Capability Roadmaps Executive Summary, NTRS-NASA Technical Reports Server (Internet).
43. Review of space resources processing for Mars missions: Martian simulants, regolith bonding concepts and additive manufacturing10.1016/j.oceram.2021.100216 ↗
44. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) (2023, April 21). Space Tools On Demand: 3D Printing in Zero G: NASA Facts, Available online: https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/fs_3dprinting_factsheet_140502.pdf.
45. Kramer, H.J. (2023, April 25). ISS: AMF (Additive Manufacturing Facility). Available online: https://www.eoportal.org/other-space-activities/iss-amf#an-overview-of-ism-in-space-manufacturing.
46. Werkheiser, N. (2023, April 25). The In-Space Refabricator, Available online: https://science.nasa.gov/science-news/news-articles/the-in-space-refabricator.
47. European Space Agency (2023, April 25). In-Orbit Manufacturing of Very Long Booms. Available online: https://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Space_Engineering_Technology/Shaping_the_Future/In-Orbit_Manufacturing_of_Very_Long_Booms.
48. Kringer, M., Schaefer, N.T., Boehrer, C., Frey, M., Schill, F., Kullmann, M., Strasser, M., and Pietras, M. (2023, April 25). Meet the Teams: AIMIS-FYT. Available online: https://www.esa.int/Education/Fly_Your_Thesis/Meet_the_teams_AIMIS-FYT.
49. European Space Agency (2023, April 25). IMPERIAL: 3D Printing’s New Dimension. Available online: https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Videos/2022/03/IMPERIAL_3D_printing_s_new_dimension.
50. European Space Agency (2023, April 25). Portable On-Board Printer (POP3D Printer). Available online: https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images/2014/11/POP3D_printer.
51. European Space Agency (2023, April 25). MELT 3D Printer. Available online: https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images/2018/10/MELT_3D_printer.
52. Sher, D. (2023, April 25). China Operates Continuous Composites 3D Printer in Space: The Autonomous System Was Launched with the New Long March 5B Rocket. Available online: https://www.voxelmatters.com/china-operates-autonomous-continuous-composites-3d-printer-in-space/.
53. Enabling the 3D Printing of Metal Components in µ-Gravity10.1002/admt.201900506 ↗
54. Airbus, D.S. (2023, April 25). In Space Manufacturing and Assembly: Delivering Technological Bricks for Airbus Space Factory. Available online: https://www.airbus.com/en/newsroom/news/2022-05-in-space-manufacturing-and-assembly.
55. Peels, J. (2023, April 25). Space Metal 3D Printer Heads to ISS in 2023. Available online: https://3dprint.com/289836/space-metal-3d-printer-to-head-to-iss-in-2023/.
56. Cyber-physical approach toward semiautonomous postprocessing of additive manufactured parts and components10.2351/7.0000328 ↗
57. Critical issues in connection with human planetary missions: Protection of and from the environment10.1016/S0094-5765(01)00106-0 ↗
58. Success! Mars rover finally collects its first rock core10.1038/d41586-021-02394-w ↗
59. Drilling Systems for Extraterrestrial Subsurface Exploration10.1089/ast.2007.0179 ↗
60. A Piezoelectric-Driven Rock-Drilling Device for Extraterrestrial Subsurface Exploration
61. Quan, Q., Bai, D., Zhao, Z., Deng, Z., Li, H., and Wang, Y. (2017, January 6–9). Development of a rotary-percussive ultrasonic drill for extraterrestrial rock sampling. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), Washington, DC, USA.10.1109/ULTSYM.2017.8092625 ↗
62. Bar-Cohen, Y., Sherrit, S., Dolgin, B.P., Bao, X., Chang, Z., Pal, D.S., Krahe, R., Kroh, J., Du, S., and Peterson, T. (2001, January 5–8). Ultrasonic/sonic drilling/coring (USDC) for planetary applications. Proceedings of the Smart Structures and Materials 2001: Smart Structures and Integrated Systems, Newport Beach, CA, USA.10.1117/12.436556 ↗
63. (2023, December 15). Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Pasadena, CA, USA, 19–23 May 2008. Available online: https://researchr.org/publication/icra%3A2008.
64. Badescu, M., Stroescu, S., Sherrit, S., Aldrich, J., Bao, X., Bar-Cohen, Y., Chang, Z., Hernandez, W., and Ibrahim, A. (2008, January 19–23). Rotary hammer ultrasonic/sonic drill system. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Pasadena, CA, USA.10.1109/ROBOT.2008.4543272 ↗
65. Numerical estimations of lunar regolith trajectories and damage potential due to rocket plumes10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.02.016 ↗
66. Effect of feed rate on surface roughness in abrasive waterjet cutting applications
67. Van Susante, P.J., Allen, J.S., Eisele, T.C., Medici, E.F., Foetisch, M.S., Zacny, K.A., and Fitzgerald, Z. (2021, January 19–23). Water Extraction from Rock Gypsum on Mars. Proceedings of the Earth and Space 2021, Virtual Conference.10.1061/9780784483374.061 ↗
68. Momber, A.W., and Kovacevic, R. (1998). Principles of Abrasive Water Jet Machining, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4471-1572-4 ↗
69. Micromachining with abrasive waterjets10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.02.041 ↗
70. An energy balance of high-speed abrasive water jet erosion10.1243/1350650991542811 ↗
71. Kartal, F. (2017). An Analysis of the Abrasive Water Jet Machining of Polyethylene Using L9 Orthogonal Array, WaterJet Technology Association.
72. A Modeling Study of Metal Cutting with Abrasive Waterjets10.1115/1.3225682 ↗
73. Abrasive water jet machining of glass with stagnation effect10.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.118 ↗
74. Suspension Technology for Abrasive Waterjet (AWJ) Cutting of Ceramics10.1016/j.procir.2018.09.037 ↗
75. High Precision Machining of Hybrid Layer Composites by Abrasive Waterjet Cutting10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.159 ↗
76. Regolith as substitute mold material for aluminum casting on the Moon10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.01.045 ↗
77. Gamwell, W., and Tracie, P. (2019). Heritage Materials for Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft.
78. Materials for Indian Space Program: An Overview10.1007/s41745-021-00284-8 ↗
79. Weiland, H., Rollett, A.D., and Cassada, W.A. (2016). ICAA13 Pittsburgh, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-48761-8 ↗
80. Willenshofer, P.D., Tunes, M.A., Vo, H.T., Stemper, L., Renk, O., Greaves, G., Uggowitzer, P.J., and Pogatscher, S. (2022). Radiation-resistant aluminium alloy for space missions in the extreme environment of the solar system. arXiv.
81. Weiland, H., Rollett, A.D., and Cassada, W.A. (2016). ICAA13 Pittsburgh, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-48761-8 ↗
82. Investigations on microstructure, mechanical, and tribological behaviour of AA 7075–xwt.% TiC composites for aerospace applications10.1016/j.acme.2018.12.003 ↗
83. Aluminium Alloys in Space Applications: A Short Report10.37934/araset.22.1.17 ↗
84. Newswander, T., Crowther, B., Gubbels, G., and Senden, R. (2013, January 26–28). Aluminum alloy AA-6061 and RSA-6061 heat treatment for large mirror applications. Proceedings of the Material Technologies and Applications to Optics, Structures, Components, and Sub-Systems, San Diego, CA, USA.10.1117/12.2024369 ↗
85. Gradl, P. (2021). Principles of Directed Energy Deposition for Aerospace Applications, Unpublished.
86. (2019). Aluminium und Aluminiumlegierungen-Chemische Zusammensetzung und Form von Halbzeug-Teil 3: Chemische Zusammensetzung und Erzeugnisformen (Standard No. DIN EN 573-3:2019-10). Deutsche Fassung EN-573-3:2019.
87. (2005). Metallische Erzeugnisse-Arten von Prüfbescheinigungen (Standard No. DIN EN 10204:2005-01). Deutsche Fassung EN-10204:2004.
88. Manufacture of glass and mirrors from lunar regolith simulant10.1007/s10853-018-3101-y ↗
89. Lunar shelter construction issues: The state-of-the-art towards 3D printing technologies10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.03.033 ↗
90. Linke, S. (2022). Mechanische Werkstoffeigenschaften von Lasergeschmolzenem Lunaren Regolith. [Doctoral Dissertation, Technische Universität Carolo-Wilhelmina zu Braunschweig].
91. Comparison of abrasive water jet technologies in terms of performance and kerf geometry accuracy for cutting ceramics10.1504/IJSM.2020.107134 ↗