Seismic Resolution Enhancement Using a Cycle Generative Adversarial Neural Network with Pseudo-Well Data
Source abstract
Abstract
High-resolution seismic processing involves the recovery of high-frequency components from seismic data with lower resolution. Traditional methods typically impose prior knowledge or predefined subsurface structures when modeling seismic high-resolution processes, and they are usually model-driven. Nowadays, there has been a growing utilization of deep learning techniques to enhance seismic resolution. These approaches involve feature learning from extensive training datasets through multi-layered neural networks and are fundamentally data-driven. However, the reliance on labeled data has consistently posed a primary challenge for deploying these methods in practical applications. To address this issue, a novel approach for seismic high-resolution reconstruction is introduced, employing a Cycle Generative Adversarial Neural Network (CycleGAN) trained on authentic pseudo-well data. The application of the CycleGAN involves creating dual mappings connecting low-resolution and high-resolution data. This enables the model to comprehend both the forward and inverse processes, ensuring the stability of the inverse process, particularly in the context of high-resolution reconstruction. More importantly, statistical distributions are extracted from well logs and used to randomly generate extensive sets of low-resolution and high-resolution training pairs. This training set captures the structural characteristics of the actual subsurface and leads to significant improvement of the proposed method. The results from experiments conducted on both synthetic and field examples validate the effectiveness of the proposed approach in significantly enhancing seismic resolution and achieving superior recovery of thin layers when compared with the conventional method and the deep-learning-based method.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques · Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis · Drilling and Well Engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Dagang Oil Field, Petrochina, Tianjin 300280, China
Institute of Geophysics, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
Funding
National Key R&D Program of China · Fundamental Research Project of CNPC Geophysical Key Lab
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Least-squares inverse filtering and wavelet deconvolution10.1190/1.1440798 ↗
2. Autoregressive recovery of the acoustic impedance10.1190/1.1441414 ↗
3. Minimum entropy deconvolution with an exponential transformation10.1111/j.1365-2478.1979.tb00979.x ↗
4. Reweighting strategies in seismic deconvolution10.1111/j.1365-246X.1997.tb04500.x ↗
5. The high-resolution seismic deconvolution method based on joint sparse representation using logging–seismic data10.1111/1365-2478.13232 ↗
6. Deterministic edge-preserving regularization in computed imaging10.1109/83.551699 ↗
7. Surface-consistent sparse multichannel blind deconvolution of seismic signals10.1109/TGRS.2015.2513417 ↗
8. FaultSeg3D: Using synthetic data sets to train an end-to-end convolutional neural network for 3D seismic fault segmentation10.1190/geo2018-0646.1 ↗
9. Deep learning reservoir porosity prediction based on multilayer long short-term memory network10.1190/geo2019-0261.1 ↗
10. Identifying microseismic events using a dual-channel CNN with wavelet packets decomposition coefficients10.1016/j.cageo.2022.105164 ↗
11. High-fidelity permeability and porosity prediction using deep learning with the self-attention mechanism10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3157765 ↗
12. Porosity prediction using semi-supervised learning with biased well log data for improving estimation accuracy and reducing prediction uncertainty10.1093/gji/ggac371 ↗
13. Lewis, W., and Vigh, D. (2017, January 24–29). Deep learning prior models from seismic images for full-waveform inversion. Proceedings of the SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG, Houston, TX, USA.10.1190/segam2017-17627643.1 ↗
14. Chen, X., and Wang, B. (2023). Self-supervised Multistep Seismic Data Deblending. Surv. Geophys., 1–25.10.1007/s10712-023-09801-z ↗
15. Building realistic structure models to train convolutional neural networks for seismic structural interpretation10.1190/geo2019-0375.1 ↗
16. Deep Learning with Fully Convolutional and Dense Connection Framework for Ground Roll Attenuation10.1007/s10712-023-09779-8 ↗
17. Das, V., Pollack, A., Wollner, U., and Mukerji, T. (2018, January 14–19). Convolutional neural network for seismic impedance inversion. Proceedings of the 2018 SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, OnePetro, Anaheim, CA, USA.10.1190/segam2018-2994378.1 ↗
18. Robust deep learning seismic inversion with a priori initial model constraint10.1093/gji/ggab074 ↗
19. Reservoir Prediction Based on Closed-Loop CNN and Virtual Well-Logging Labels10.1109/TGRS.2022.3205301 ↗
20. Physics-Constrained Seismic Impedance Inversion Based on Deep Learning
21. Incorporating Structural Constraint Into the Machine Learning High-Resolution Seismic Reconstruction10.1109/TGRS.2022.3157064 ↗
22. Isola, P., Zhu, J.Y., Zhou, T., and Efros, A.A. (2017, January 21–26). Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2017.632 ↗