Influence of Structural and Material Uncertain Parameters on Honeycomb Sandwich Panels Based on Neural Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Jiang L, Xiao S, Zhang J, Lv R, Yang B, Dong D, et al. Experimental and simulation studies on the compressive properties of brazed aluminum honeycomb plates and a strength prediction method. Metals Basel. 2020;10:1544. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10111544.10.3390/met10111544 ↗
2. Zarrouk T, Salhi J-E, Nouari M, Salhi M, Chaabelasri E, Makich H, et al. Modeling machining of aluminum honeycomb structure. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2022;123:2481–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10350-9.10.1007/s00170-022-10350-9 ↗
3. Elenchezhian MRP, Vadlamudi V, Raihan R, Reifsnider K, Reifsnider E. Artificial intelligence in real-time diagnostics and prognostics of composite materials and its uncertainties-a review. Smart Mater Struct. 2021;30:083001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ac099f.10.1088/1361-665X/ac099f ↗
4. Mesogitis TS, Skordos AA, Long AC. Uncertainty in the manufacturing of fibrous thermosetting composites: a review. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2014;57:67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.11.004.10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.11.004 ↗
5. Grover N, Sahoo R, Singh BN, Maiti DK. Influence of parametric uncertainties on the deflection statistics of general laminated composite and sandwich plates. Compos Struct. 2017;171:158–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.036.10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.036 ↗
6. Belarbi M-O, Khechai A, Houari MSA, Bessaim A, Hirane H, Garg A. Free vibration behavior of sandwich FGM beams: parametric and uncertainty analysis. J Vib Eng Technol. 2024;12:883–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-024-01452-7.10.1007/s42417-024-01452-7 ↗
7. Khayat M, Baghlani A, Najafgholipour MA. A hybrid algorithm for modeling and studying of the effect of material and mechanical uncertainties on stability of sandwich FGM materials under thermal shock. Compos Struct. 2022;293:115657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115657.10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115657 ↗
8. Sharma H, Ganguli R. Optimization of a higher-order sandwich composite beam under uncertainties. Compos Struct. 2021;269:114003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114003.10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114003 ↗
9. Ariyasinghe N, Herath S. Machine learning techniques for predictive modelling and uncertainty quantification of the mechanical properties of woven carbon fibre composites. Mater Today Commun. 2024;40:109732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.109732.10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.109732 ↗
10. Behera S, Mohapatra DR, Mondal S. Free vibration analysis of FRP sandwich composite plate and quantification of uncertainties in its vibration response. Int J Struct Stab Dyn. 2023;23:2350032. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455423500323.10.1142/S0219455423500323 ↗
11. Karsh PK, Raturi HP, Kumar RR, Dey S. Parametric uncertainty quantification in natural frequency of sandwich panels using polynomial neural network. IOP Conf Series: Mater Sci Eng. 2020;798:012036. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/798/1/012036.10.1088/1757-899x/798/1/012036 ↗
12. Thanikasalam N, Vasudevan M, Ramamoorthy M, Gunasegeran M. Vibration and uncertainty analysis of MWCNT reinforced composite sandwich beam with a biomimetic dual core. J Sandw Struct Mater. 2025;27:790–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/10996362241312278.10.1177/10996362241312278 ↗
13. Zhou C, Song X, Liu H, Liu H, He X, Zhou C. Uncertainty analysis of honeycomb sandwich composite radome under imprecise probability. Int J Mech Mater Des. 2023;19:165–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10999-022-09621-w.10.1007/s10999-022-09621-w ↗
14. Zhang F, Du R, Qiao Z, Wang W, Zhang J, Wang X. Quantitative structural uncertainty analysis of composite honeycomb sandwich using a feedback neural network. Physica D. 2024;458:133985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2023.133985.10.1016/j.physd.2023.133985 ↗
15. Zhao Z, Wang H, Liu C, Xu X, Sun L, Wang J, et al. An FFT-based method for uncertainty quantification of Nomex honeycomb’s in-plane elastic properties. Compos Struct. 2022;301:116217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116217.10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116217 ↗
16. Iqbal S, Kamiński M, Ardakani SMS. Uncertainty quantification of effective mechanical characteristics of hexagonal cellular material. Mech Res Commun. 2025;144:104368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2025.104368.10.1016/j.mechrescom.2025.104368 ↗
17. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF. Cellular solids: structure and properties. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997. p. 135–8.10.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
18. Peralta L, Campos AI, Rodrigues MS. Thickness and uniformity of commercial aluminum foils. J Mater Eng Perform. 2025;34:9637–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-025-10722-8.10.1007/s11665-025-10722-8 ↗
19. Standardization Administration of China. GB/T 3198–2020. Aluminum and aluminum alloy foil. Beijing: Standards Press of China; 2020.
20. Volinsky AA, Moody NR, Gerberich WW. Interfacial toughness measurements for thin films on substrates. Acta Mater. 2002;50:441–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00354-8.10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00354-8 ↗
21. Guo Z, Wang Y, Zhu J, Feng J. Experimental research of mechanical properties for aluminum foil. J Exp Mech. 2016;31:451–7. https://doi.org/10.7520/1001-4888-15-233.10.7520/1001-4888-15-233 ↗
22. Jin X, Zhao P, Chen W, Ma K, Fu Y, Guo S, et al. Effect of grain size on the mechanical properties and formability of AA8021 aluminum foil. J Mater Eng Perform. 2022;31:10354–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-022-06989-w.10.1007/s11665-022-06989-w ↗
23. Standardization Administration of China GB/T 22638.11-2016. Test methods for aluminum and aluminum alloy foils Part 11 Determination of mechanical properties. Beijing: Standards Press of China. (2016)
24. Standardization Administration of China. GB/T 1453–2022. Test method for flatwise compression properties of sandwich constructions or cores. Standards Press of China. Beijing 2022
25. Chen W, Chen M, Feng S, Jin X. Effect of crystallographic texture on the anisotropic tensile behavior of aluminum foil and its industrial application. J Mater Eng Perform. 2022;31:1306–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-06256-4.10.1007/s11665-021-06256-4 ↗
26. Xie Y, Li W, Liu C, Du M, Feng K. Optimization of stamping process parameters based on improved GA-BP neural network model. Int J Precis Eng Manuf. 2023;24:1129–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-023-00811-w.10.1007/s12541-023-00811-w ↗
27. Bronder S, Herter F, Bähre D, Jung A. Optimized design for modified auxetic structures based on a neural network approach. Mater Today Commun. 2022;32:103931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103931.10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103931 ↗
28. Luan W, Lu L, Li X, Ma C. Weight determination of sustainable development indicators using a global sensitivity analysis method. Sustainability. 2017;9:303. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020303.10.3390/su9020303 ↗