Simplified High-Performance Cost Aggregation for Stereo Matching
Source abstract
Abstract
Applying edge preservation filters for cost aggregation has been a leading technique in generating dense disparity maps. However, traditional approaches usually require intensive calculations, and their design parameters must be tuned for different scenarios to obtain the best performance. This paper shows that a simple texture-independent aggregation approach can achieve similar high performance. The proposed algorithm is equivalent to a sequence of matrix multiplications involving two weighting matrices and a primary matching cost. Notably, the weighting matrices are constant for image pairs with the same resolution. For higher matching accuracy, we integrate the algorithm with a multi-scale scheme to fully exploit the spatial distribution of textures in the image pairs. The resultant hybrid approach is efficient and accurate enough to surpass most existing approaches in stereo matching. The performance of the proposed approach is verified by extensive simulation results using the Middlebury (3rd Edition) benchmark stereo database.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Vision and Imaging · Advanced Image Processing Techniques · Image Enhancement Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
The 38th Research Institute of China Electronics Technology Group Corporation, Hefei 230093, China
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan
Department of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ming Chi University of Technology, New Taipei City 243303, Taiwan
Funding
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. A taxonomy and evaluation of dense two-frame stereo correspondence algorithms10.1023/A:1014573219977 ↗
2. Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts10.1109/34.969114 ↗
3. Stereo processing by semiglobal matching and mutual information10.1109/TPAMI.2007.1166 ↗
4. Sparse representation over discriminative dictionary for stereo matching10.1016/j.patcog.2017.06.015 ↗
5. Dynamic programming with adaptive and self-adjusting penalty for real-time accurate stereo matching10.1007/s11554-021-01180-1 ↗
6. A Resource-Efficient Pipelined Architecture for Real-Time Semi-Global Stereo Matching10.1109/TCSVT.2021.3061704 ↗
7. Adaptive support-weight approach for correspondence search10.1109/TPAMI.2006.70 ↗
8. Liu, H., Zhang, H., Nie, X., He, W., Luo, D., Jiao, G., and Chen, W. (2021, January 15–19). Stereo matching algorithm based on two-phase adaptive optimization of AD-Census and gradient fusion. Proceedings of the Conference on Real-time Computing and Robotics, Xining, China.10.1109/RCAR52367.2021.9517511 ↗
9. Guided image filtering10.1109/TPAMI.2012.213 ↗
10. Fast cost-volume filtering for visual correspondence and beyond correspondence search10.1109/TPAMI.2012.156 ↗
11. Weighted guided image filtering
12. A local stereo matching algorithm based on weighted guided image filtering for improving the generation of depth range images10.1016/j.displa.2017.07.006 ↗
13. Fast stereo matching using adaptive guided filtering10.1016/j.imavis.2014.01.001 ↗
14. Stereo matching algorithm based on per pixel difference adjustment, iterative guided filter and graph segmentation10.1016/j.jvcir.2016.11.016 ↗
15. Improvement of stereo matching algorithm for 3D surface reconstruction10.1016/j.image.2018.04.001 ↗
16. Local stereo matching using adaptive cross-region-based guided image filtering with orthogonal weights
17. Stereo matching using tree filtering10.1109/TPAMI.2014.2353642 ↗
18. An efficient recursive edge-aware filter10.1016/j.image.2014.07.005 ↗
19. Efficient stereo matching based on pervasive guided image filtering10.1155/2019/3128172 ↗
20. Zhu, C., and Chang, Y.Z. (2019). Hierarchical guided-image-filtering for efficient stereo matching. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9153122 ↗
21. Stereo matching with fusing adaptive support weights10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2916035 ↗
22. Robust stereo data cost with a learning strategy10.1109/TITS.2016.2563661 ↗
23. Godard, C., Aodha, O.M., and Brostow, G.J. (2017, January 21–26). Unsupervised monocular depth estimation with left-right consistency. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2017.699 ↗
24. A simplified ICA-based local similarity stereo matching10.1007/s00371-020-01811-x ↗
25. Chang, J.R., and Chen, Y.S. (2018, January 19–21). Pyramid stereo matching network. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00567 ↗
26. Feature-guided spatial attention upsampling for real-time stereo matching network10.1109/MMUL.2020.3030027 ↗
27. HPM-TDP: An efficient hierarchical PatchMatch depth estimation approach using tree dynamic programming
28. Zabih, R., and Woodfill, J. (1994, January 2–6). Non-parametric local transforms for computing visual correspondence. Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computer Vision, Stockholm, Sweden.10.1007/BFb0028345 ↗
29. A direct tridiagonal solver based on Givens rotations for GPU architectures10.1016/j.parco.2015.03.008 ↗
30. Zhang, K., Fang, Y., Min, D., Sun, L., Yang, S., Yan, S., and Tian, Q. (2014, January 23-28). Cross-scale cost aggregation for stereo matching. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Columbus, OH, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2014.206 ↗
31. Scharstein, D., Hirschmüller, H., Kitajima, Y., Krathwohl, G., Nesic, N., Wang, X., and Westling, P. (2014, January 12–15). High-resolution stereo datasets with subpixel-accurate ground truth. Proceedings of the German Conference on Pattern Recognition (GCPR 2014), Münster, Germany.10.1007/978-3-319-11752-2_3 ↗
32. Moritz, M., and Geiger, A. (2015, January 8–10). Object Scene Flow for Autonomous Vehicles. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Boston, MA, USA.
33. Escalating the resolution of an urban aerial image via novel shadow amputation algorithm10.1007/s12145-022-00772-0 ↗