CPM-GFDM: A Novel Combination of Continuous Phase Modulation and Generalized Frequency Division Multiplexing for Wireless Communication
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, continuous phase modulation-generalized frequency division multiplexing (CPM-GFDM) is proposed. The performance of CPM-GFDM is evaluated over Gaussian and frequency selective fading channels. In the proposed technique, the mapper in the transmitter and the de-mapper in the receiver of traditional GFDM are replaced by a CPM mapper and de-mapper, respectively. Using Monte-Carlo simulations, the bit error rate performance is evaluated for several rational values of the modulation index. We establish the superiority of CPM-GFDM over traditional GFDM using error performance plots through extensive simulations. We demonstrate that there are several values of the modulation index that give a performance superior to the conventional GFDM, with h=12,310,516,716 giving the best performance for additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channels, while for the frequency-selective channels the best performance is observed when h=310,516,716.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: PAPR reduction in OFDM · Wireless Communication Networks Research · Advanced Wireless Communication Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computer Engineering, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia
Funding
Umm al-Qura University
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Schaich, F., and Wild, T. (2014, January 21–23). Waveform Contenders for 5g—OFDM Vs. FBMC Vs. UFMC. Proceedings of the 2014 6th International Symposium on Communications, Control and Signal Processing (ISCCSP), Athens, Greece.10.1109/ISCCSP.2014.6877912 ↗
2. Fbmc Physical Layer: A Primer
3. Shawqi, F.S., Audah, L., Mostafa, S.A., Gunasekaran, S.S., Baz, A., Hammoodi, A.T., Alhakami, H., Hassan, M.H., Jubair, M., and Alhakami, W. (2020). A New SLM-UFMC Model for Universal Filtered Multi-Carrier to Reduce Cubic Metric and Peak to Average Power Ratio in 5g Technology. Symmetry, 12.10.3390/sym12060909 ↗
4. Performance Analysis of Noma Systems over Rayleigh Fading Channels with Successive-Interference Cancellation10.1049/iet-com.2019.0504 ↗
5. Saito, Y., Kishiyama, Y., Benjebbour, A., Nakamura, T., Li, A., and Higuchi, K. (2013, January 2–5). Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) for Cellular Future Radio Access. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 77th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), Dresden, Germany.10.1109/VTCSpring.2013.6692652 ↗
6. Abdoli, J., Jia, M., and Ma, J. (July, January 28). Filtered OFDM: A New Waveform for Future Wireless Systems. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 16th International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC), Stockholm, Sweden.10.1109/SPAWC.2015.7227001 ↗
7. Fettweis, G., Krondorf, M., and Bittner, S. (2009, January 26–29). GFDM-Generalized Frequency Division Multiplexing. Proceedings of the VTC Spring 2009-IEEE 69th Vehicular Technology Conference, Barcelona, Spain.10.1109/VETECS.2009.5073571 ↗
8. Polar-Coded GFDM Systems10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2947254 ↗
9. Interference Mitigation in D2D Communication Underlying Cellular Networks: Towards Green Energy
10. Iterative Frequency Domain Equalization for MIMO-GFDM Systems10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2823002 ↗
11. Precoded GFDM Transceiver with Low Complexity Time Domain Processing
12. Robust WHT- GFDM for the Next Generation of Wireless Networks10.1109/LCOMM.2014.2374181 ↗
13. Low-Complexity Modem Design for GFDM10.1109/TSP.2015.2502546 ↗
14. Gaspar, I., Michailow, N., Navarro, A., Ohlmer, E., Krone, S., and Fettweis, G. (2013, January 2–5). Low Complexity GFDM Receiver Based on Sparse Frequency Domain Processing. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 77th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), Dresden, Germany.10.1109/VTCSpring.2013.6692619 ↗
15. Datta, R., Michailow, N., Lentmaier, M., and Fettweis, G. (2012, January 3–6). GFDM Interference Cancellation for Flexible Cognitive Radio Phy Design. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall), Quebec City, QC, Canada.10.1109/VTCFall.2012.6399031 ↗
16. Matrix Characterization for GFDM: Low Complexity Mmse Receivers and Optimal Filters10.1109/TSP.2017.2718971 ↗
17. Low-Complexity Iterative MMSE-Pic Detection for MIMO- GFDM
18. Maraş, M., Ayvaz, E.N., Gömeç, M., Savaşcıhabeş, A., and Özen, A. (2021). A Novel GFDM Waveform Design Based on Cascaded WHT-LWT Transform for the Beyond 5g Wireless Communications. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21051831 ↗
19. Ber Analysis for GFDM Systems with Gabor Mmse Receiver10.1109/LCOMM.2018.2868107 ↗
20. Ber Analysis of Wfrft Precoded OFDM and GFDM Waveforms with an Integer Time Offset10.1109/TVT.2018.2855696 ↗
21. Bit Error Probability for Mmse Receiver in GFDM Systems10.1109/LCOMM.2018.2808475 ↗
22. Performance Analysis of Ldpc Coded GFDM Systems10.1049/cmu2.12415 ↗
23. High Spectral Efficiency and Low Error Rate MIMO-GFDM for Next-Generation Communication Systems10.1109/TVT.2021.3127912 ↗
24. Low-Complexity Receivers for Massive MIMO-GFDM Communications10.1002/ett.4219 ↗
25. Low-Complexity Mu-MIMO-GFDM Joint Receivers
26. Polynomial Expansion-Based Mmse Channel Estimation and Precoding for Massive MIMO-GFDM Systems
27. Union Bound on the Bit Error Rate for MIMO-GFDM Systems10.1007/s11277-021-09215-3 ↗
28. Kassam, J., Miri, M., Magueta, R., Castanheira, D., Pedrosa, P., Silva, A., Dinis, R., and Gameiro, A. (2020). Two-Step Multiuser Equalization for Hybrid mmwave Massive MIMO GFDM Systems. Electronics, 9.10.3390/electronics9081220 ↗
29. Li, S., Zhao, Y., He, L., Wu, Z., and Li, Y. (2016, January 9–12). Design and Performance Analysis of a GFDM-DCSK Communication System. Proceedings of the 2016 13th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CCNC.2016.7444885 ↗
30. Aulin, T., and Sundberg, C.-E. (1978, January 3–6). Bounds on the Performance of Binary Cpfsk Type of Signaling with Input Data Symbol Pulse Shaping. Proceedings of the NTC’78, National Telecommunications Conference, Birmingham, AL, USA.
31. Continuous Phase Modulation-Part I: Full Response Signaling10.1109/TCOM.1981.1095001 ↗
32. Continuous Phase Modulation-Part II: Partial Response Signaling10.1109/TCOM.1981.1094985 ↗
33. Optimal Parameter Design of Continuous Phase Modulation for Future Gnss Signals10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3073317 ↗
34. Acryp-Proc: Flexible Asymmetric Crypto Processor for Point Multiplication10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2828319 ↗
35. Flexible Architectures for Cryptographic Algorithms—A Systematic Literature Review10.1142/S0218126619300034 ↗
36. Alves, B.M., Mendes, L.L., Guimaraes, D.A., and Gaspar, I.S. (2013, January 2–4). Performance of GFDM over Frequency-Selective Channels. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Telecommunications, Santa Rita do Sapuca, Brazil.
37. Proakis, J.G., and Salehi, M. (2008). Digital Communications, McGraw-Hill.
38. OFDM-CPM Signals10.1049/el:20020044 ↗
39. Anderson, J.B., and Aulin, T. (1986). Digital Phase Modulation, Plenum.10.1007/978-1-4899-2031-7 ↗
40. Matthe, M., Michailow, N., Gaspar, I., and Fettweis, G. (2014, January 10–14). Influence of Pulse Shaping on Bit Error Rate Performance and out of Band Radiation of Generalized Frequency Division Multiplexing. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC), Sydney, Australia.10.1109/ICCW.2014.6881170 ↗
41. Discrete Fourier Transform Spreading-Based Generalised Frequency Division Multiplexing10.1049/el.2014.3833 ↗
42. Generalized Frequency Division Multiplexing for 5th Generation Cellular Networks10.1109/TCOMM.2014.2345566 ↗
43. OFDM-CPM Signals for Wireless Communications10.1109/CJECE.2003.1426070 ↗
44. Sklar, B. (2001). Digital Communications: Fundamentals and Applications, Prentice-Hall. [2nd ed.].
45. Haykin, S. (2008). Communication Systems, John Wiley & Sons.
46. (2023, January 03). Vodafone Chair Mobile Communications Systems—Testbed. Available online: http://owl.ifn.et.tu-dresden.de/GFDM/.
47. Üçüncü, A.B., and Yilmazx, A.Ö. (2015). Out-of-Band Radiation Comparison of GFDM, WCP-COQAM and OFDM at Equal Spectral Efficiency. arXiv.
48. OFDM Versus Filter Bank Multicarrier10.1109/MSP.2011.940267 ↗
49. Performance of GFDM Systems Using Quadratic Programming Pulse Shaping Filter Design10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2975430 ↗
50. Michailow, N., Datta, R., Krone, S., Lentmaier, M., and Fettweis, G. (2012, January 12–14). Generalized Frequency Division Multiplexing: A Flexible Multi-Carrier Modulation Scheme for 5th Generation Cellular Networks. Proceedings of the German Microwave Conference (GeMiC), Ilmenau, Germany.10.1109/ISWCS.2012.6328352 ↗
51. Towards Multicarrier Waveforms Beyond OFDM: Performance Analysis of GFDM Modulation for Underwater Acoustic Channels10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3043718 ↗
52. On Rate Region Analysis of Half-and Full-Duplex OFDM Communication Links10.1109/JSAC.2014.2330131 ↗