A Resilient Cyber-Physical Demand Forecasting System for Critical Infrastructures against Stealthy False Data Injection Attacks
Source abstract
Abstract
The safe and efficient function of critical national infrastructure (CNI) relies on the accurate demand forecast. Cyber-physical system-based demand forecasting systems (CDFS), typically found in CNI (such as energy, water, and transport), are highly vulnerable to being compromised under false data injection attacks (FDIAs). The problem is that the majority of existing CDFS employ anomaly-based intrusion detection systems (AIDS) to combat FDIAs. Since the distribution of demand time series keeps changing naturally with time, AIDS treat a major change in the distribution as an attack, but this approach is not effective against colluding FDIAs. To overcome this problem, we propose a novel resilient CDFS called PRDFS (Proposed Resilient Demand Forecasting System). The primary novelty of PRDFS is that it uses signature-based intrusion detection systems (SIDS) that automatically generate attack signatures through the game-theoretic approach for the early detection of malicious nodes. We simulate the performance of PRDFS under colluding FDIA on High Performance Computing (HPC). The simulation results show that the demand forecasting resilience of PRDFS never goes below 80%, regardless of the percentage of malicious nodes. In contrast, the resilience of the benchmark system decreases sharply from about 99% to less than 30%, over the simulation period as the percentage of malicious nodes increases.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Network Security and Intrusion Detection · Smart Grid Security and Resilience · Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
WMG, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
School of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
Funding
Innovate UK
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Gudova, I.A., and Frau, O. (2020). Proceedings of the International Scientific Conferences, Command and Staff Faculty. “Strategies XXI”, Supple.
2. Muralidhar, N., Muthiah, S., Sharma, R., and Ramakrishnan, N. (2019, January 9–12). Multivariate long-term state forecasting in cyber-physical systems: A sequence to sequence approach. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, Los Angeles, CA, USA.10.1109/BigData47090.2019.9005511 ↗
3. SCOPE: Secure compiling of PLC in cyber-physical systems10.1016/j.ijcip.2021.100431 ↗
4. Rogers, R., Apech, E., and Richardson, C.J. (2016., January 15–17). Resilience of the Internet of Things (IoT) from an information assurance (IA) perspective. Proceedings of the 2016 10th International Conference on Software, Knowledge, Information Management & Applications (SKIMA), Chengdu, China.10.1109/SKIMA.2016.7916206 ↗
5. A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001 ↗
6. Cyber physical systems security: Analysis, challenges and solutions10.1016/j.cose.2017.04.005 ↗
7. Internet of Things: Architectures, protocols, and applications
8. Water demand forecasting: Review of soft computing methods10.1007/s10661-017-6030-3 ↗
9. Zhou, X., Li, Y., Barreto, C.A., Li, J., Volgyesi, P., Neema, H., and Koutsoukos, X. (2019, January 4–7). Evaluating resilience of grid load predictions under stealthy adversarial attacks. Proceedings of the 2019 Resilience Week (RWS), San Antonio, TX, USA.10.1109/RWS47064.2019.8971816 ↗
10. Hoque, M.E., Thavaneswaran, A., Appadoo, S.S., Thulasiram, R.K., and Banitalebi, B. (2021, January 12–16). A novel dynamic demand forecasting model for resilient supply chains using machine learning. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 45th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), Madrid, Spain.10.1109/COMPSAC51774.2021.00040 ↗
11. Karthik, N., and Ananthanarayana, V.S. (2016, January 23–26). Data trustworthiness in wireless sensor networks. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/ISPA, Tianjin, China.
12. Agarwal, V., Pal, S., Sharma, N., and Sethi, V. (2020, January 10–13). Identification of defective nodes in cyber-physical systems. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 17th International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS), Delhi, India.10.1109/MASS50613.2020.00012 ↗
13. Cybersecurity attacks in vehicular sensors10.1109/JSEN.2020.3004275 ↗
14. Faalse data injection attack and its countermeasures in wireless sensor networks
15. Analysis of false data injection attackss in power systems: A dynamic Bayesian game-theoretic approach10.1016/j.isatra.2021.01.011 ↗
16. Kumari, A., and Tanwar, S. (2021, January 28–29). RAKSHAK: Resilient and scalable demand response management scheme for smart grid systems. Proceedings of the 2021 11th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering (Confluence), Noida, India.10.1109/Confluence51648.2021.9377139 ↗
17. Barreto, C., and Koutsoukos, X. (2019). Decision and Game Theory for Security. Alpcan, T., Vorobeychik, Y., Baras, J., Dan, G., Eds., Springer.
18. Secure and resilient demand side management engine using machine learning for IoT-enabled smart grid10.1016/j.scs.2020.102370 ↗
19. Chen, Q., Zhang, C., and Zhang, S. (2008). Secure Transaction Protocol Analysis, Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Springer.
20. A hybrid trust management scheme for wireless sensor networks10.1007/s11277-017-4772-4 ↗
21. Amine, A., Bellatreche, L., Elberrichi, Z., Neuhold, E., and Wrembel, R. (2015). Computer Science and Its Applications, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology; Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-19578-0 ↗
22. Trustworthiness in industrial IoT systems based on artificial intelligence10.1109/TII.2020.2994747 ↗
23. Examining performance of aggregation algorithms for neural network-based electricity demand forecasting10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.08.025 ↗
24. Undetectable Finite-Time Covert Attack on Constrained Cyber-Physical Systems10.1109/TCNS.2022.3140692 ↗
25. Donohue, K., Katok, E., and Leider, S. (2018). The Handbook of Behavioral Operations, Wiley Online Library. [1st ed.].10.1002/9781119138341 ↗
26. Trust management systems for wireless sensor networks:best practices10.1016/j.comcom.2010.02.006 ↗
27. Trust-based recommendation systems in internet of things: A systematic literature review10.1186/s13673-019-0183-8 ↗
28. Trust based approach for improving data reliability in industrial sensor networks
29. Bayesian fusion algorithm for inferring trust in wireless sensor networks
30. Marinenkov, E., Chuprov, S., Viksnin, I., and Kim, I. (2019, January 12–13). Empirical study on trust, reputation, and game theory approach to secure communication in a group of unmanned vehicles. Proceedings of the MICSECS, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
31. Lim, H.-S., Moon, Y.-S., and Bertino, E. (2010, January 13). Provenance-based trustworthiness assessment in sensor networks. Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Data Management for Sensor Networks, Singapore.10.1145/1858158.1858162 ↗
32. Lotufo, A.D.P., and Minussi, C.R. (September, January 29). Electric power systems load forecasting: A survey. Proceedings of the International Conference on Electric Power Engineering, Power Tech, Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.
33. Fallah, S.N., Deo, R.C., Shojafar, M., Conti, M., and Shamshirband, S. (2018). Computational intelligence approaches for energy load forecasting in smart energy management grids: State of the art, future challenges, and research directions. Energies, 11.10.3390/en11030596 ↗
34. Probabilistic demand forecasting at scale10.14778/3137765.3137775 ↗
35. Nonstationary time series transformation methods: An experimental review10.1016/j.knosys.2018.10.041 ↗
36. Day-ahead natural gas demand forecasting based on the combination of wavelet transform and ANFIS/genetic algorithm/neural network model10.1016/j.energy.2016.12.033 ↗
37. Detecting stealthy attacks against industrial control systems based on residual skewness analysis10.1186/s13638-019-1389-1 ↗
38. Bhuiyan, M.Z.A., and Wu, J. (2016, January 8–12). Collussion attack detection in networked systems. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 14th Intl Conf on Dependable, Automatic and Secure Computing, Aukland, New Zealand.10.1109/DASC-PICom-DataCom-CyberSciTec.2016.67 ↗
39. Albawi, S., Mohammed, T.A., and Al-Zawi, S. (2017, January 21–23). Understanding of a convolutional neural network. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Engineering and Technology (ICET), Antalya, Turkey.10.1109/ICEngTechnol.2017.8308186 ↗
40. A general regression neural network10.1109/72.97934 ↗
41. Zhang, D. (2019). Fundamentals of Image Data Mining, Texts in Computer Science; Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-17989-2 ↗
42. Particle swarm optimization algorithm: An overview10.1007/s00500-016-2474-6 ↗
43. Demand-side management and its impact on utility and consumers through a game theoretic approach10.1016/j.ijepes.2022.107995 ↗
44. UNISON data-driven intermittent demand forecast framework to empower supply chain resilience and an empirical study in electronics distribution10.1016/j.cie.2019.07.002 ↗
45. A new metric of absolute percentage error for intermittent demand forecasts10.1016/j.ijforecast.2015.12.003 ↗