A Modified Elastoplastic Contact Stiffness Model Considering Continuous Smooth Contact Characteristics and Substrate Deformation
Source abstract
Abstract
The contact stiffness of the joint surface directly affects the static and dynamic mechanical behavior, and accuracy of the machine tool. A new elastoplastic contact stiffness model is proposed by considering continuous and smooth contact characteristics and substrate deformation. First, the interpolation interval of cubic Hermite polynomials is improved to meet the continuous and smooth change of contact parameters during asperity deformation. Then, the micro-contact mechanism considering substrate deformation is explored by establishing an asperity-substrate system model. Furthermore, combined with statistical principles, a new contact stiffness model of the joint surface is established. Finally, the correctness of the built model is verified by comparing with experimental data and different contact models. The simulation results show that the model changes continuously and smoothly in the three deformation regions. The substrate deformation mainly affects the asperities in the elastic contact stage. The smoother is the surface, the more significant is the influence of substrate deformation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis · Tribology and Lubrication Engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Li L, Yun Q, Li Z, Liu Y, Cao C. A new contact model of joint surfaces accounting for surface waviness and substrate deformation. Int J Appl Mech. 2019;11(08):1950079.10.1142/S1758825119500790 ↗
2. Zou H, Wang B. Investigation of the contact stiffness variation of linear rolling guides due to the effects of friction and wear during operation. Trib Int. 2015;92:472–84.10.1016/j.triboint.2015.07.005 ↗
3. Zhang GP, Huang YM, Shi WH, Fu WP. Predicting dynamic behaviours of a whole machine tool structure based on computer-aided engineering. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2003;43(7):699–706.10.1016/S0890-6955(03)00026-9 ↗
4. Ren Y, Beards C. Identification of’effective’linear joints using coupling and joint identification techniques. J Vib Acoust. 1998;120(2):331–8.10.1115/1.2893835 ↗
5. Burdekin M, Back N, Cowley A. Analysis of the local deformations in machine joints. J Mech Eng Sci. 1979;21(1):25–32.10.1243/JMES_JOUR_1979_021_006_02 ↗
6. Greenwood JA, Williamson JP. Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proc Royal Soc London Series A Math Phys Sci. 1966;295(1442):300–19.
7. Chang W, Etsion I, Bogy DB. An elastic-plastic model for the contact of rough surfaces. J Trib. 1987;109(2):257–63.10.1115/1.3261348 ↗
8. Zhao Y, Maietta DM, Chang L. An asperity microcontact model incorporating the transition from elastic deformation to fully plastic flow. J Trib. 2000;122(1):86–93.10.1115/1.555332 ↗
9. Kogut L, Etsion I. A finite element based elastic-plastic model for the contact of rough surfaces. Trib Trans. 2003;46(3):383–90.10.1080/10402000308982641 ↗
10. Kogut L, Etsion I. Elastic-plastic contact analysis of a sphere and a rigid flat. J Appl Mech. 2002;69(5):657–62.10.1115/1.1490373 ↗
11. Brake M. An analytical elastic-perfectly plastic contact model. Int J Solids Struct. 2012;49(22):3129–41.10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.06.013 ↗
12. Xiao H, Sun Y. On the normal contact stiffness and contact resonance frequency of rough surface contact based on asperity micro-contact statistical models. Eur J Mech-A/Solids. 2019;75:450–60.10.1016/j.euromechsol.2019.03.004 ↗
13. Shi X, Policarpou A. Investigation of contact stiffness and contact damping for magnetic storage head-disk interfaces. J Trib. 2008;130(2):021901.10.1115/1.2908901 ↗
14. Zhao T, Feng YT. Extended Greenwood-Williamson models for rough spheres. J Appl Mech. 2018;85(10):101007.10.1115/1.4040537 ↗
15. Lu X, Huang F, Zhao B, Keer LM. Contact behaviors of coated asperity with power-law hardening elastic-plastic substrate during loading and unloading process. Int J Appl Mech. 2018;10(3):1850034.10.1142/S1758825118500345 ↗
16. Pullen J, Williamson J. On the plastic contact of rough surfaces. Proc Royal Soc London A Math Phys Sci. 1972;327(1569):159–73.
17. Wadwalkar SS, Jackson RL, Kogut L. A study of the elastic-plastic deformation of heavily deformed spherical contacts. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J J Eng Trib. 2010;224(10):1091–102.10.1243/13506501JET763 ↗
18. Abbott E, Firestone F. Specifying surface quality: a method based on accurate measurement and comparison. Spie Milestone Series MS. 1995;107:569–72.
19. Wang D, Zhang Z, Jin F, Fan X. Normal contact model for elastic and plastic mechanics of rough surfaces. Acta Mech Solida Sinica. 2019;32(2):148–59.10.1007/s10338-018-0066-y ↗
20. Beheshti A, Khonsari M. Asperity micro-contact models as applied to the deformation of rough line contact. Trib Int. 2012;52:61–74.10.1016/j.triboint.2012.02.026 ↗
21. Li L, Wang J, Pei X, Chu W, Cai A. A modified elastic contact stiffness model considering the deformation of bulk substrate. J Mech Sci Technol. 2020;34(2):777–90.10.1007/s12206-020-0126-3 ↗
22. McCool JI. Relating profile instrument measurements to the functional performance of rough surfaces. J Trib. 1987;109(2):264–70.10.1115/1.3261349 ↗
23. Xiao H, Sun Y. An improved virtual material based acoustic model for contact stiffness measurement of rough interface using ultrasound technique. Int J Solids Struct. 2018;155:240–7.10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.07.026 ↗
24. Gonzalez-Valadez M, Baltazar A, Dwyer-Joyce R. Study of interfacial stiffness ratio of a rough surface in contact using a spring model. Wear. 2010;268(3–4):373–9.10.1016/j.wear.2009.08.022 ↗
25. Iida K, Ono K. Design consideration of contact/near-contact sliders based on a rough surface contact model. J Trib. 2003;125(3):562–70.10.1115/1.1537269 ↗
26. Shi X, Polycarpou AA. Investigation of contact stiffness and contact damping for magnetic storage head-disk interfaces. J Trib. 2008;130(2):843–54.10.1115/1.2908901 ↗