journal article·2013-10

High-coercivity ultrafine-grained anisotropic Nd–Fe–B magnets processed by hot deformation and the Nd–Cu grain boundary diffusion process

H. Sepehri-Amin, T. Ohkubo, S. Nagashima, M. Yano, T. Shoji, A. Kato, T. Schrefl, K. Hono

Acta Materialia· Volume 61· Issue 17
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The grain boundary diffusion process using an Nd70Cu30 eutectic alloy has been applied to hot-deformed anisotropic Nd–Fe–B magnets, resulting in a substantial enhancement of coercivity, from 1.5 T to 2.3 T, at the expense of remanence. Scanning electron microscopy showed that the areal fraction of an Nd-rich intergranular phase increased from 10% to 37%. The intergranular phase of the hot-deformed magnet initially contained ∼55 at.% ferromagnetic element, while it diminished to an undetectable level after the process. Microscale eutectic solidification of Nd/NdCu as well as a fine lamellae structure of Nd70(Co,Cu)30/Nd were observed in the intergranular phase. Micromagnetic simulations indicated that the reduction of the magnetization in the intergranular phases leads to the enhancement of coercivity in agreement with the experimental observation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties of Alloys · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Magnetic properties of thin films

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Hirosawa · J Magn Magn Mater · 1986 · 61 · 36310.1016/0304-8853(86)90050-8 ↗
2. Kronmüller · J Magn Magn Mater · 1988 · 87 · 29110.1016/0304-8853(88)90202-8 ↗
3. Fidler · J Appl Phys · 1991 · 70 · 645610.1063/1.349929 ↗
4. Engelmann · Scripta Mater · 1997 · 36 · 5510.1016/S1359-6462(96)00312-0 ↗
5. Bernardi · J Appl Phys · 1994 · 76 · 624110.1063/1.358293 ↗
6. Vial · J Magn Magn Mater · 2002 · 242–245 · 132910.1016/S0304-8853(01)00967-2 ↗
7. Sepehri-Amin · Scripta Mater · 2010 · 63 · 112410.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.08.021 ↗
8. Mishima · 2010
9. Nakamura · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2005 · 41 · 384410.1109/TMAG.2005.854874 ↗
10. Hirota · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2006 · 42 · 290910.1109/TMAG.2006.879906 ↗
11. Watanabe · Mater. Trans. · 2007 · 48 · 91510.2320/matertrans.48.915 ↗
12. Li · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 48 · 787610.1143/JJAP.47.7876 ↗
13. Hono · Scripta Mater · 2012 · 67 · 53010.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.06.038 ↗
14. Lee · Appl Phys Lett · 1985 · 46 · 79010.1063/1.95884 ↗
15. Mishra · J Appl Phys · 1987 · 62 · 96710.1063/1.339709 ↗
16. Kirchner · J All Comp · 2004 · 365 · 28610.1016/S0925-8388(03)00661-3 ↗
17. Haizuka · Denki Seiko · 2011 · 82 · 85
18. Liu · Acta Mater. · 2013 · 61 · 538710.1016/j.actamat.2013.05.027 ↗
19. Livingston · J Appl Phys · 1985 · 57 · 413710.1063/1.334644 ↗
20. Lewis · Scripta Metall Mater · 1995 · 33 · 177510.1016/0956-716X(95)00410-W ↗
21. Lewis · J Appl Phys · 1994 · 76 · 623510.1063/1.358291 ↗
22. Fuerst · Appl Phys Lett · 1990 · 56 · 225210.1063/1.102934 ↗
23. Sagawa · J Appl Phys · 1985 · 57 · 409410.1063/1.334629 ↗
24. Schrefl · J Appl Phys · 1998 · 83 · 626210.1063/1.367666 ↗
25. Kronmüller · Phys Status Solidi B · 1985 · 130 · 19710.1002/pssb.2221300118 ↗
26. Hock S. PhD thesis, Max-Planck-Institute for Metals Research, Institute of Physics, 1988, p. 118.
27. Pinkerton · J Magn Magn Mater · 1990 · 89 · 13910.1016/0304-8853(90)90717-5 ↗
28. Hono · Prog Mater Sci · 2002 · 47 · 62110.1016/S0079-6425(01)00007-X ↗
29. Sepehri-Amin · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 81910.1016/j.actamat.2011.10.043 ↗
30. Subramanian · Bulletin of Alloy Phase Diagrams · 1988 · 9 · 362
31. Okamoto · J phase Equil · 1993 · 14 · 12210.1007/BF02652173 ↗
32. Sepehri-Amin · Scripta Mater · 2013 · 68 · 16710.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.10.005 ↗
33. Wulff · Z Kristallogr · 1901 · 34 · 44910.1524/zkri.1901.34.1.449 ↗
34. Herring · Phys Rev · 1951 · 82 · 8710.1103/PhysRev.82.87 ↗