A new method for M -integral experimental evaluation
Source abstract
Abstract
In this article, the experimental measurement method of M-integral is investigated. Through the detailed analysis to the nondestructive evaluation method of J- and M-integrals suggested by King and Herrmann, it is found that the specimen geometry which they selected and the corresponding clamping mode in their test exists a conflict with the stress distribution assumption on the integral contour. The formulas they proposed cannot represent the selected specimen geometry and the related integral contours. To avoid this conflict, a new experimental measurement method and a simper specimen style is proposed in this study. According to the method, the M-integral is nondestructive evaluated experimentally through the new specimen and the new clamping mode.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Numerical methods in engineering · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory For Mechanical Structural Strength and Vibration, School of Aerospace, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
School of Material Science & Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/105678950606493710.1177/1056789506064937 ↗
2. 10.1016/0093-6413(74)90012-310.1016/0093-6413(74)90012-3 ↗
3. 10.1115/1.342292610.1115/1.3422926 ↗
4. Bueckner HF · 1973 · 239
5. 10.1177/105678950301200100110.1177/1056789503012001001 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00242-010.1016/S0020-7683(00)00242-0 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00243-210.1016/S0020-7683(00)00243-2 ↗
8. 10.1115/1.158219910.1115/1.1582199 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.10.00710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.10.007 ↗
10. 10.1098/rsta.1951.001610.1098/rsta.1951.0016 ↗
11. Eshelby JD · 1970 · 77
12. 10.1177/105678950606793510.1177/1056789506067935 ↗
13. 10.1016/0020-7683(78)90028-810.1016/0020-7683(78)90028-8 ↗
14. Gunther W · 1962 · 61 · 53
15. 10.1177/105678950403925510.1177/1056789504039255 ↗
16. 10.1115/1.315766710.1115/1.3157667 ↗
17. 10.1115/1.317699710.1115/1.3176997 ↗
18. 10.1115/1.317699710.1115/1.3176997 ↗
19. 10.1177/105678950808923310.1177/1056789508089233 ↗
20. 10.1177/105678950809754910.1177/1056789508097549 ↗
21. 10.1115/1.315759710.1115/1.3157597 ↗
22. 10.1007/BF0025077810.1007/BF00250778 ↗
23. 10.1177/105678950505035710.1177/1056789505050357 ↗
24. 10.1177/105678950910370410.1177/1056789509103704 ↗
25. 10.1115/1.360120610.1115/1.3601206 ↗
26. Rice JR · 1968 · 191
27. Saanouni K · European Journal of Mechanics · 1989 · 8 · 437
28. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2006.09.00610.1016/j.tafmec.2006.09.006 ↗