A thermodynamically consistent strain-gradient model for functionally graded nanobeams with composite damage mechanics on elastic substrate medium
Source abstract
Abstract
This study develops a functionally graded (FG) nanobeam model incorporating composite damage mechanics within a thermodynamically consistent strain-gradient framework. The formulation is based on Euler–Bernoulli beam theory, while the nanobeam–substrate interaction is represented by a Winkler foundation. Damage is introduced through a partially degraded ceramic phase, whereas the metal phase remains intact. Three effective-property models, namely the Voigt, Reuss, and proposed formulations, are used to describe the damaged FG material response. The governing equations are derived using the principle of virtual work, and analytical solutions are obtained for the static bending response. The results show that damage reduces effective stiffness and increases bending deflection, while higher ceramic content and substrate stiffness enhances the overall rigidity. The proposed model yields physically admissible predictions bounded by the Voigt and Reuss limits, demonstrating its consistency for damaged FG nanobeam–substrate systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Numerical methods in engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Phayao
Prince of Songkla University
King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok
Thammasat University
Burapha University
Khon Kaen University
Funding
National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) and KMUTNB under the Senior Research Scholar program · University of Phayao and Thailand Science Research and Innovation Fund
References (76)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/zamm.20200028910.1002/zamm.202000289 ↗
2. 10.1177/168781401983706710.1177/1687814019837067 ↗
3. Alnujaie A, Abdelrahman AA, Alanasari AM, et al. (2023) Influence of flexoelectricity on bending of piezoelectric perforated FG composite nanobeam rested on elastic foundation. Steel and Composite Structures 49(4): 361–380.
4. 10.1007/s00339-021-04654-y10.1007/s00339-021-04654-y ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.03.03310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.03.033 ↗
6. 10.1140/epjp/i2017-11441-910.1140/epjp/i2017-11441-9 ↗
7. 10.1155/2013/36093510.1155/2013/360935 ↗
8. 10.1115/1.277716410.1115/1.2777164 ↗
9. 10.1007/s10853-009-3855-310.1007/s10853-009-3855-3 ↗
10. 10.1177/00219980177266209110.1177/002199801772662091 ↗
11. 10.3390/ijms2303148410.3390/ijms23031484 ↗
12. 10.1080/15376494.2017.136597910.1080/15376494.2017.1365979 ↗
13. 10.1016/0020-7225(72)90070-510.1016/0020-7225(72)90070-5 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.33280310.1063/1.332803 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.10550110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105501 ↗
16. 10.1007/s11831-024-10196-210.1007/s11831-024-10196-2 ↗
17. 10.1007/s00366-022-01696-510.1007/s00366-022-01696-5 ↗
18. 10.3390/en1609366410.3390/en16093664 ↗
19. Hibbeler RC (2022) Mechanics of Materials. 11th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Pearson.
20. 10.3390/nano1606034710.3390/nano16060347 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2026.14591810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2026.145918 ↗
22. 10.3390/ma1307155110.3390/ma13071551 ↗
23. 10.1115/1.312281010.1115/1.3122810 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00578-110.1016/S0921-5093(03)00578-1 ↗
25. 10.1007/s00707-022-03332-110.1007/s00707-022-03332-1 ↗
26. Kumar Y, Gupta A, Tounsi A (2021) Size-dependent vibration response of porous graded nanostructure with FEM and nonlocal continuum model. Advances in Nano Research 11(1): 1–17.
27. 10.1016/S0022-5096(03)00053-X10.1016/S0022-5096(03)00053-X ↗
28. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e4016810.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40168 ↗
29. Limkatanyu S, Sae-Long W, Damrongwiriyanupap N, et al. (2025a) Composite damage modeling of recycled aggregate concrete beam on Winkler-Pasternak foundations: A multiphase mechanical approach. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 96(2): 139–153.
30. 10.1177/1056789525138024410.1177/10567895251380244 ↗
31. 10.3390/nano1203037510.3390/nano12030375 ↗
32. 10.3390/nano1210174010.3390/nano12101740 ↗
33. 10.1080/19648189.2014.96584710.1080/19648189.2014.965847 ↗
34. 10.22190/FUME220506029L10.22190/FUME220506029L ↗
35. Limkatanyu S, Sae-Long W, Rungamornrat J, et al. (2025c) Static bending analysis of nanobeam-substrate medium systems incorporating mixture stress-driven nonlocality, surface energy, and substrate-structure interactions. Journal of Applied and Computational Mechanics 11(2): 327–343.
36. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.06.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2009.06.004 ↗
37. 10.1039/C5TA10697D10.1039/C5TA10697D ↗
38. 10.3390/ma1516565610.3390/ma15165656 ↗
39. 10.1080/15583724.2018.147342410.1080/15583724.2018.1473424 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jmps.2012.04.00410.1016/j.jmps.2012.04.004 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2014.08.00410.1016/j.mechrescom.2014.08.004 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.cpb.2025.10049210.1016/j.cpb.2025.100492 ↗
43. 10.1007/BF0024849010.1007/BF00248490 ↗
44. 10.1007/BF0025394610.1007/BF00253946 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.rineng.2023.10140710.1016/j.rineng.2023.101407 ↗
46. 10.3390/ma1521767110.3390/ma15217671 ↗
47. 10.22190/FUME240904048N10.22190/FUME240904048N ↗
48. 10.2174/012212797632588324091004381910.2174/0122127976325883240910043819 ↗
49. 10.3390/en1521817510.3390/en15218175 ↗
50. 10.1007/978-1-4020-8743-110.1007/978-1-4020-8743-1 ↗
51. 10.1002/mma.681210.1002/mma.6812 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.07710.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.077 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2023.10388710.1016/j.ijengsci.2023.103887 ↗
54. 10.1142/S021987622341010410.1142/S0219876223410104 ↗
55. 10.3390/ma1008088410.3390/ma10080884 ↗
56. 10.3390/ma1519661710.3390/ma15196617 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.ast.2019.02.01710.1016/j.ast.2019.02.017 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.10.03610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.10.036 ↗
59. 10.1177/1056789524130322110.1177/10567895241303221 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.14236510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.142365 ↗
61. 10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00992-710.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00992-7 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.physb.2017.06.02910.1016/j.physb.2017.06.029 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.53610.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.536 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2025.10792810.1016/j.compstruc.2025.107928 ↗
65. 10.1177/108128651989265510.1177/1081286519892655 ↗
66. 10.1016/0307-904X(76)90023-810.1016/0307-904X(76)90023-8 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.snb.2013.01.04910.1016/j.snb.2013.01.049 ↗
68. 10.1007/s10409-015-0508-410.1007/s10409-015-0508-4 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2012.04.01110.1016/j.ijrmhm.2012.04.011 ↗
70. Winkler E (1867) Die Lehre von der Elastizität und Festigkeit. Prague: Dominicus.
71. Wolfram S (1992) Mathematica reference guide. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
72. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2006)132:11(1195)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2006)132:11(1195) ↗
73. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e0632110.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06321 ↗
74. 10.1177/108128651988600310.1177/1081286519886003 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.jcp.2021.11026810.1016/j.jcp.2021.110268 ↗
76. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10930210.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109302 ↗