journal article·2022-04-15Open access

Soil Classification from Piezocone Penetration Test Using Fuzzy Clustering and Neuro-Fuzzy Theory

Joon-Shik Moon, Chan-Hong Kim, Young-Sang Kim

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 8

Abstract

The advantage of the piezocone penetration test is a guarantee of continuous data, which are a source of reliable interpretation of the target soil layer. Much research has been carried out for several decades, and several classification charts have been developed to classify in situ soil from the cone penetration test result. Even though most present classification charts or methods were developed on the basis of data which were compiled over many countries, they should be verified to be feasible for local country. However, unfortunately, revision of those charts is quite difficult or almost impossible even though a chart provides misclassified soil class. In this research, a new method for developing soil classification model is proposed by using soft computing theory—fuzzy C-mean clustering and neuro-fuzzy theory—as a function of 5173 piezocone penetration test (PCPT) results and soil boring logs compiled from 17 local sites around Korea. Feasibility of the proposed soil classification model was verified from the viewpoint of accuracy of the classification result by comparing the classification results not only for data which were used for developing the model but also new data, which were not included in developing the model with real boring logs, other fuzzy computing classification models, and Robertson’s charts. The biggest advantage of the proposed method is that it is easy to make the piezocone soil classification system more accurate by updating new data.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics · Soil and Unsaturated Flow · Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea

Korea Mine Rehabilitation and Mineral Resources Corporation, Wonju 26464, Korea

Department of Civil Engineering, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Korea

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Begemann, H.K. (1965, January 8–15). The friction jacket cone as an aid in determining the soil profile. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Montreal, QC, Canada.
2. Douglas, B.J., and Olsen, R.S. (1981, January 26–30). Soil classification using electric cone penetrometer. Cone Penetration testing and Experience. Proceedings of the ASCE National Convention, St. Louis, MO, USA.
3. Robertson, P.K., Campanella, R.G., Gillespie, D., and Greig, J. (1986, January 23–25). Use of Piezometer Cone Data. Proceedings of the ASCE Specialty Conference In Situ ’86: Use of In Situ Test in Geotechnical Engineering, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
4. Soil classification using the cone penetration test10.1139/t90-014 ↗
5. Soil classification by the cone penetration test: Discussion10.1139/t91-023 ↗
6. Soil identification using Piezocone Data by Fuzzy Method10.3208/sandf.38.255 ↗
7. Statistical to Fuzzy Approach toward CPT Soil Classification10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:3(179) ↗
8. Objective Site Characterization using Clustering of Piezocone Data10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:12(986) ↗
9. Tsiaousi, D., Travasarou, T., Drosos, V., Ugalde, J., and Chacko, J. (2018). Machine Learning Applications for Site Characterization Based on CPT Data. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics V: Slope Stability and Landslides, Laboratory Testing and In Situ Testing; American Society of Civil Engineers.10.1061/9780784481486.048 ↗
10. Automatic classification of fine-grained soils using CPT measurements and Artificial Neural Networks10.1016/j.aei.2018.04.003 ↗
11. A Bayesian unsupervised learning approach for identifying soil stratification using cone penetration data10.1139/cgj-2017-0709 ↗
12. Prediction of Soil Composition from CPT Data Using General Regression Neural Network10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2006)20:4(281) ↗
13. Prediction of undrained shear strength using extreme gradient boosting and random forest based on Bayesian optimization10.1016/j.gsf.2020.03.007 ↗
14. Rauter, S., and Tschuchnigg, F. (2021). CPT Data Interpretation Employing Different Machine Learning Techniques. Geosciences, 11.10.3390/geosciences11070265 ↗
15. Cone penetration test dataset Premstaller Geotechnik10.1016/j.dib.2020.106618 ↗
16. Interpretation of cone penetration tests—A unified approach10.1139/T09-065 ↗
17. Robertson, P.K. (2010, January 9–11). Soil Behaviour Type from the CPT: An Update. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, Huntington Beach, CA, USA.
18. Cone penetration test (CPT)-based soil behaviour type (SBT) classification system—An update10.1139/cgj-2016-0044 ↗
20. Study on Applicability of CPT Based Soil Classification Chart