A Systematic Revision of the NFIP Claims Hazard Data in Florida for Flood Risk Assessment
Source abstract
Abstract
The hazard components of National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) claims data in Florida were systematically analyzed and revised in the current study. The provided fields in NFIP claims data are not always complete or accurate and are often missing. The authors associated each claim to a proper flood hazard event by updating the provided catastrophe number using the National Hurricane Center HURDAT2 (best track data). The claims with presumably incorrect cause of loss fields were identified and revised by adding a variety of other available information to claims data. These datasets included tropical cyclone events, rainfall maxima, and distances to the nearest coast. The enhanced information assisted in identifying the cause or likelihood of a hazard event or attributing a particular hazard event to a loss claim. The revised NFIP claims data will be intensively used to validate the outcomes from flood hazard (i.e., surge, wave and inland flooding) models and to develop a flood vulnerability model in the forthcoming Florida Public Flood Loss Model (FPFLM).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research · Disaster Management and Resilience
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-2840, USA
Department of Environmental Atmospheric Sciences, Pukyung National University, Busan 48513, Korea
Funding
Florida Office of Insurance Regulation (FLOIR). · Ministry of Ocean, Korea
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Florida Commission on Hurricane Loss Projection Methodology (2022, January 15). Flood Standards Report of Activities. Available online: www.sbafla.com/methodology.
2. Florida Commission on Hurricane Loss Projection Methodology (2022, January 15). Hurricane Standards Report of Activities. Available online: www.sbafla.com/methodology.
3. Catastrophe model based assessment of Hurricane risk and estimates of potential insured losses for the State of Florida10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000050 ↗
4. Examining flood insurance claims in the United States: Six key findings10.1111/jori.12106 ↗
5. Probabilistic depth-damage curves for assessment of flood-induced building losses10.1007/s11069-019-03622-3 ↗
6. New insights into US flood vulnerability revealed from flood insurance big data10.1038/s41467-020-15264-2 ↗
7. Davis, S.A., and Skaggs, L.L. (1992). Catalog of Residential Depth-Damage Functions Used by the Army Corps of Engineers in Flood Damage Estimation, USACE Institute for Water Resources. IWR-92-R-3.
8. Skaggs, L.L., and Davis, S.A. (2014). Variations in Residential Depth-Damage Functions Used by the US Army Corps of Engineers in Flood Damage Estimation, Association of State Floodplain Managers.
9. Pinelli, J.-P., Rodriguez, D., Roueche, D., Gurley, K., Baradaranshoraka, M., Cocke, S., Shin, D.W., Lapaiche, L., and Gay, R. (2018). Data management for the development of a flood vulnerability model. Safety and Reliability–Safe Societies in a Changing World, Taylor & Francis.10.1201/9781351174664-349 ↗
10. Pinelli, J.-P., Cruz, J.D., Gurley, K., Paleo-Torres, A.S., Baradaranshoraka, M., Cocke, S., and Shin, D.W. (2020). Uncertainty reduction through data management in the development, validation, calibration, and operation of a hurricane vulnerability model. Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci., 11.10.1007/s13753-020-00316-4 ↗
11. Atlantic hurricane database uncertainty and presentation of a new database format10.1175/MWR-D-12-00254.1 ↗
12. Physiographically sensitive mapping of climatological temperature and precipitation across the conterminous United States10.1002/joc.1688 ↗
13. Completion of the 2011 national land cover database for the conterminous United States-Representing a decade of land cover change information
14. Comparison of the CEST and SLOSH models for storm surge flooding10.2112/06-0709.1 ↗
15. The HRD real-time hurricane wind analysis system10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00131-7 ↗
16. Massey, T.C., Anderson, M.E., Smith, J.M., Gomez, J., and Jones, R. (2011). STWAVE: Steady-State Spectral Wave Model. User’s Manual for STWAVE, Version 6.0, US Army Corps of Engineers. Report ERDC/CHL SR-11-1.10.21236/ADA550608 ↗
17. A cellular automata fast flood evaluation (CA-ffe) model10.1029/2018WR023679 ↗