An improved continuous damage model to estimate multiaxial fatigue life under strain control problems
Source abstract
Abstract
In this contribution, a modification and application of the Lemaitre damage evolution law is proposed for the problem of fatigue life estimate under low number of cycles. For this, the denominator of damage, considered constant for Lemaitre, was replaced by a function dependent on the stress triaxiality. The new function has a nonlinear and thermodynamically consistent behavior. In addition, the evolution law of the backstress tensor is adopted as proposed by Desmorat, where there is no saturation of the limit value. The formulation is implemented in an academic tool for analysis at one Gauss point, through an implicit integration strategy of the flow equations. The Newton-Raphson method is used to solve a system of nonlinear equations, with two tensor and two scalar equations. Thus, in order to demonstrate the robustness of the model, experimental data from the literature for SAE 1045 and S460N steels are adopted. Proportional and nonproportional axial, torsional and multiaxial loading paths are simulated. Finally, the results have shown that the modification formulation is a good strategy to control the damage evolution in predicting fatigue life. In this sense, the calculated lives by the new proposal are within a scatter band of factor three, both under normal or torsional uniaxial loading conditions, as well as proportional or nonproportional multiaxial conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Brasília, Brasilia, Brazil
ENS Paris-Saclay, CNRS, LMT – Laboratoire de Mécanique et Technologie, Université Paris-Saclay, Cachan, France
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.10243910.1016/j.tafmec.2019.102439 ↗
2. Armstrong PJ, Frederick COA (1966) Mathematical representation of the multiaxial bauschinger effect, Tech. rep., Report RD/B/N731, CEGB, Central Electricity Generating Board, Report RD/B/N731, CEGB, Central Electricity Generating Board, Berkeley, England.
3. 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1973_187_069_0210.1243/PIME_PROC_1973_187_069_02 ↗
4. Callister WD · 2009
5. 10.1590/1679-7825434010.1590/1679-78254340 ↗
6. Collins JA · 2009
7. Crossland B (1956) Effect of large hydrostatic pressures on the torsional fatigue strength of an alloy steel. In: Proceedings of the international conference on fatigue of metals, London, England, pp. 138–149. Institution of Mechanical Engineers.
8. 10.1002/978047069462610.1002/9780470694626 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.crme.2010.02.00710.1016/j.crme.2010.02.007 ↗
10. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1988.tb01169.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1988.tb01169.x ↗
11. Hoffmeyer J (2015) Anrisslebensdauervorhersage bei mehrachsiger beanspruchung auf basis des kurzrisskonzepts. PhD Thesis, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany.
12. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.10.02810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.10.028 ↗
13. Karwa R · 2005
14. Leese G, Socie D F (1989) Multiaxial fatigue: Analysis and experiments, advances in engineering, AE-14, Tech. rep., Society of Automotive Engineers, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
15. 10.1115/1.322577510.1115/1.3225775 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2016.12.00310.1016/j.tafmec.2016.12.003 ↗
17. 10.1007/s40430-019-1976-410.1007/s40430-019-1976-4 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2014.01.00210.1016/j.ijplas.2014.01.002 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0093-6413(02)00239-210.1016/S0093-6413(02)00239-2 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.12.01010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.12.010 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.11.00210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.11.002 ↗
22. 10.1177/105678951879520410.1177/1056789518795204 ↗
23. 10.1299/jsme1958.20.25710.1299/jsme1958.20.257 ↗
24. 10.1016/0142-1123(90)90097-X10.1016/0142-1123(90)90097-X ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2019.09.01210.1016/j.ijplas.2019.09.012 ↗
26. Simo J · 1998
27. Smith KN · Journal of Materials · 1970 · 5 · 767
28. Vang KD · Sciences et Techniques de L’armement · 1973 · 47 · 429
29. Wierzbicki T, Xue L (2005) On the effect of the third invaraint of the stress deviator on ductile fracture, Tech. rep., Report 136, Impact and Crashworthiness Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts, United States of America.