Application of Association Rules Analysis in Mining Adverse Drug Reaction Signals
Source abstract
Abstract
Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are increasingly becoming a serious public health problem. Spontaneous reporting systems (SRSs) are an important way for many countries to monitor ADRs produced in the clinical use of drugs, and they are the main data source for ADR signal detection. The traditional signal detection methods are based on disproportionality analysis (DPA) and lack the application of data mining technology. In this paper, we selected the spontaneous reports from 2011 to 2018 in Jiangsu Province of China as the research data and used association rules analysis (ARA) to mine signals. We defined some important metrics of the ARA according to the two-dimensional contingency table of ADRs, such as Confidence and Lift, and constructed performance evaluation indicators such as Precision, Recall, and F1 as objective standards. We used experimental methods based on data to objectively determine the optimal thresholds of the corresponding metrics, which, in the best case, are Confidence = 0.007 and Lift = 1. We obtained the average performance of the method through 10-fold cross-validation. The experimental results showed that F1 increased from 31.43% in the MHRA method to 40.38% in the ARA method; this was a significant improvement. To reduce drug risk and provide decision making for drug safety, more data mining methods need to be introduced and applied to ADR signal detection.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions · Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques · Computational Drug Discovery Methods
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Management, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210003, China
Key Research Base of Philosophy and Social Sciences in Jiangsu-Information Industry Integration Innovation and Emergency Management Research Center, Nanjing 210003, China
School of Internet of Things, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210003, China
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Adverse drug reactions: Definitions, diagnosis, and management10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02799-9 ↗
2. Adverse drug reactions10.7861/clinmedicine.16-5-481 ↗
3. Comparing data mining methods on the VAERS database10.1002/pds.1107 ↗
4. Criteria revision and performance comparison of three methods of signal detection applied to the spontaneous reporting database of a pharmaceutical manufacturer10.2165/00002018-200730080-00008 ↗
5. Early postmarketing drug safety surveillance: Data mining points to consider
6. Long-term Risk of Cardiovascular Events with Rosiglitazone: A Meta-analysis10.1001/jama.298.10.1189 ↗
7. Quantitative Methods in Pharmacovigilance: Focus on Signal Detection10.2165/00002018-200326030-00003 ↗
8. Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases10.1145/170036.170072 ↗
9. Agrawal, R., and Srikant, R. (1994, January 12–15). Fast algorithms for mining association rules in large databases. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB), Santiago de, Chile, Chile.
10. Scalable algorithms for association mining10.1109/69.846291 ↗
11. Zaki, M.J., Parthasarathy, S., Ogihara, M., and Li, W. (1997, January 14–17). New Algorithms for Fast Discovery of Association Rules. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Newport Beach, CA, USA.10.1007/978-1-4615-5669-5_1 ↗
12. Parallel Algorithms for Discovery of Association Rules10.1023/A:1009773317876 ↗
13. Hájek, P., and Havránek, T. (1978). Mechanizing Hypothesis Formation: Mathematical Foundations for a General Theory, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-66943-9 ↗
14. Reps, J.M., Aickelin, U., Ma, J., and Zhang, Y. (2014, January 14). Refining Adverse Drug Reactions Using Association Rule Mining for Electronic Healthcare Data. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshop, Shenzhen, China.10.1109/ICDMW.2014.53 ↗
15. Application of Association Rules in Clinical Data Mining: A Case Study for Identifying Adverse Drug Reactions10.1016/j.jval.2016.03.1726 ↗
16. Use of proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) for signal generation from spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports
17. Knowledge Discovery in Databases: An Overview
18. Arules—A Computational Environment for Mining Association Rules and Frequent Item Sets10.18637/jss.v014.i15 ↗
19. Algorithms for association rule mining—A general survey and comparison10.1145/360402.360421 ↗
20. Olson, D.L., and Delen, D. (2008). Advanced Data Mining Techniques, Springer. [1st ed.].
21. The truth of the F-measure
22. The exploitation of distributional information in syllable processing10.1016/S0911-6044(03)00059-9 ↗
23. Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Measure to ROC, Informedness, Markedness & Correlation
24. A case of levofloxacin-induced anaphylaxis with elevated serum tryptase levels10.4168/aair.2013.5.2.113 ↗
25. Detecting Potential Adverse Drug Reactions Using Association Rules and Embedding Models10.1007/978-3-319-59575-7_37 ↗
26. Mining association patterns of drug-interactions using post marketing FDA’s spontaneous reporting data10.1016/j.jbi.2016.02.009 ↗
27. The characteristics and regularities of cardiac adverse drug reactions induced by Chinese materia medica: A bibliometric research and association rules analysis10.1016/j.jep.2020.112582 ↗