journal article·2026-04-25

A novel fatigue life prediction approach of a GH4169 superalloy-welded joint based on a physics-informed machine learning method

Zhicheng Liu, Sihui Yang, Songlin Peng, Bochuan Li

Publisher page

Abstract

Defects were usually inevitable during welding process, the equivalent size of the maximum initial welded defects that perpendicular to the loading direction was usually introduced as the initial crack, whereas, the influence of morphology feature of the defects could not be well considered, and the fatigue life prediction issue of welded joint was usually challengeable according to the dispersion of the morphology, size, location, and quantity of the welding defects. Therefore, a physics-informed machine learning approach was constructed in order to captured the action mechanism of morphology features of welding defects in this study, the introduction of the additional physics information not only extended the initial training datasets, but also enhanced the interpretability of the lifetime prediction results, influence of the morphology detail of the defects was well considered through a modified physics fatigue prediction model. The final fatigue life prediction results revealed that physics-informed long short-term memory network approach was the best one compared with physics-informed convolutional neural network and the physics-informed random forest method, which exhibited the highest coefficient of determination and the most robust generalization ability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Fatigue and fracture mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Chizhou University

Aecc Hunan Power Machinery Research Institute

College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Hunan University

Funding

Excellence Engineer in Mechanical Design & Manufacturing and Automation · National Science Foundation of China · Key Natural Science Project of Universities in Anhui Province

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.04.11910.1016/j.matpr.2018.04.119 ↗
2. 10.1515/HTMP.2001.20.2.11710.1515/HTMP.2001.20.2.117 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.10750810.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107508 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.prostr.2022.03.01910.1016/j.prostr.2022.03.019 ↗
5. 10.1016/S1003-6326(13)62685-010.1016/S1003-6326(13)62685-0 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.11431610.1016/j.eswa.2020.114316 ↗
7. 10.1007/s11831-024-10145-z10.1007/s11831-024-10145-z ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.10848610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108486 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.10725110.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107251 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.05.01610.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.05.016 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.11.06710.1016/j.jmapro.2024.11.067 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.11152510.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.111525 ↗
13. 10.1080/09603409.2021.187463110.1080/09603409.2021.1874631 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2025.02.04410.1016/j.jmapro.2025.02.044 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.10856610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108566 ↗
16. Liu M, Wang X, Mi D, et al. (2025) A new fatigue life prediction method for welded joints based on machine learning incorporating defect information and physics of failure. International Journal of Fatigue 11: 109234.
17. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.10760410.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107604 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10483-025-3240-710.1007/s10483-025-3240-7 ↗
19. Murakami Y (2019) Metal Fatigue: Effects of Small Defects and Nonmetallic Inclusions. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
20. 10.1016/j.prostr.2019.12.01410.1016/j.prostr.2019.12.014 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10613810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106138 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.03.03010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.03.030 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cma.2024.11760310.1016/j.cma.2024.117603 ↗
24. 10.3390/math1215230010.3390/math12152300 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11108910.1016/j.matdes.2022.111089 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.02.02810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.02.028 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.10781210.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107812 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cja.2024.06.02210.1016/j.cja.2024.06.022 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.10771510.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107715 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10732410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107324 ↗
31. 10.1007/s12206-018-1010-210.1007/s12206-018-1010-2 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.10636310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106363 ↗
33. Wang H Li B Gong J et al. (2023) Machine learning-based fatigue life prediction of metal materials: Perspectives of physics-informed and data-driven hybrid methods. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 284: 109242.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109242 ↗
34. Wen S (2023) Service failure mechanism and life evaluation of Ni-based superalloy electron beam welding joints. PhD dissertation Dept. Mech. Eng. Hunan Univ. Changsha China 2023.
35. 10.1111/ffe.1414210.1111/ffe.14142 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10695510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106955 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.10792410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107924 ↗
38. 10.1111/ffe.1303110.1111/ffe.13031 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.10863110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108631 ↗
40. 10.1111/ffe.1439010.1111/ffe.14390 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10685110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106851 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.10635610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106356 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.10845910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108459 ↗