journal article·2019-09

A fatigue life prediction method from magnetic pole material to simulation part

Long Pan, Jian Chao Pang, Yu Jun Xie, Meng Xiao Zhang, Liang Liang Nie, Yun Xian Mao, Zhe Feng Zhang

Publisher page

Abstract

Due to the higher reliability needs of the large moving component motor-generator rotor, the assessment of the service life has drawn more and more attention. After finite element analysis of the rotor, the simulation part which can represent the magnetic pole with the most dangerous position of the rotor was designed to investigate the S–N curves. Compared with the conventional specimen, considering the main influencing factors of fatigue life for simulation part, the comprehensive factor was proposed to establish the fatigue life relationship between magnetic pole material and simulation part. It was found that the calculation method of fatigue notch factor based on the notch sensitivity factor is relatively simple and practical, and there is no significant effect of surface roughness on high and low cycle fatigues for low roughness ( R a is about 1 µm), and the dimension factor changes linearly with the scale factor. Based on those results, a fatigue life prediction method was proposed and validated, and the predicted results were in good agreement with the experimental data. This study will provide a reasonable reference to determine the fatigue life prediction of large moving components.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Materials Fatigue and Fracture Laboratory, Institute of Metal Research, Shenyang, China

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Liaoning Shihua University, Fushun, China

Power Generation Company, China Southern Power Grid, Guangzhou, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00018-910.1016/S0142-1123(00)00018-9 ↗
2. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2004.00862.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2004.00862.x ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.10.00110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.10.001 ↗
4. Dowling NE · 2012
5. 10.1007/BF0004238310.1007/BF00042383 ↗
6. 10.1016/0013-7944(79)90081-X10.1016/0013-7944(79)90081-X ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.11.00510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.11.005 ↗
8. Haibach E · 2003
9. 10.1017/CBO978051181093010.1017/CBO9780511810930 ↗
10. Huang N (2013) Research on fatigue life prediction methods for large-scale components . PhD Thesis, Central South University.
11. 10.1111/ffe.1255310.1111/ffe.12553 ↗
12. 10.1177/105678951769905410.1177/1056789517699054 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.10.01510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.10.015 ↗
14. Lee YL · 2005
15. Li SM · 2006
16. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.07.00110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.07.001 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.08.00810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.08.008 ↗
18. Neuber H · 1946
19. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.03.01310.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.03.013 ↗
20. 10.1111/ffe.1275410.1111/ffe.12754 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.08.00910.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.08.009 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.11.10310.1016/j.msea.2012.11.103 ↗
23. 10.1111/ffe.1215810.1111/ffe.12158 ↗
24. Peterson RE (1959) Analytical approach to stress concentration effects in aircraft materials, Technical report 59–507, US Air Force WADC symposium on the fatigue of metals, Dayton, OH.
25. Sims JR (2012) Section VIII, Division 3—Alternative rules for construction of high-pressure vessels. Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code , vol. 2, 4th ed. New York: ASME Press.
26. 10.1002/mawe.20060009010.1002/mawe.200600090 ↗
27. Stephens RI · 2001
28. Sun D · Chinese Quarterly of Mechanics · 2015 · 36 · 288
29. 10.1046/j.1460-2695.2000.00302.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.2000.00302.x ↗
30. 10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00062-110.1016/S0142-1123(00)00062-1 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.10.04310.1016/j.msea.2016.10.043 ↗
32. 10.1007/s11661-015-3010-510.1007/s11661-015-3010-5 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.12.09910.1016/j.msea.2017.12.099 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.08.00410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.08.004 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.07.00710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.07.007 ↗
36. 10.1016/0142-1123(88)90038-210.1016/0142-1123(88)90038-2 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.05.03510.1016/j.msea.2017.05.035 ↗
38. 10.1002/adem.20170047610.1002/adem.201700476 ↗
39. 10.1002/adem.20160058110.1002/adem.201600581 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.01.00210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.01.002 ↗
41. 10.1177/105678951772317110.1177/1056789517723171 ↗