Dynamic responses of concrete piers under close-in blast loading
Source abstract
Abstract
Piers are essential components for bridge structures while exposed directly to car-bombed detonation. Numerical simulation and failure-mode investigation are conducted for concrete piers under close-in blast loading to better understand their dynamic responses. The effects of pier geometry, reinforcement arrangement, and location of detonation are particularly studied on the horizontal velocity and displacement of the pier base. The results demonstrate that circular piers provide more effective blast resistance than square piers under the same blast circumstance. Failure modes for concrete piers are determined by the longitudinal rebar arrangement, which contributes to the major part of shear capacity of the pier base when subjected to close-in blast loading. While the hoop effect is limited for blast resistance of piers, the restraining influence of the ground is significant with respect to the pier base, and performance-based seismic design concept such as plastic-hinges can be employed at the base of concrete piers for anti-blast design.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Fire effects on concrete materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Transportation, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, PRC
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/105678951348247910.1177/1056789513482479 ↗
2. AUTODYN Theory Manual (2006) Revision 6.1. Concord, Calif, USA: Century Dynamics.
3. Baker WE · 1973
4. 10.1177/105678951452164710.1177/1056789514521647 ↗
5. 10.21236/AD014476210.21236/AD0144762 ↗
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000012410.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000124 ↗
7. 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2008)13:6(586)10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2008)13:6(586) ↗
8. Henrych J (1979) The Dynamics of Explosion and Its Use, Amsterdam and New York: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, pp. 558.
9. 10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-910.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9 ↗
10. 10.1007/978-3-642-86682-110.1007/978-3-642-86682-1 ↗
11. Miller PJ · Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings · 1996 · 418 · 413
12. NCHRP (2010) NCHRP Report 645: Blast-Resistant Highway Bridges: Design and Detailing Guidelines, Washington, DC: National Cooperative Highway Research Program, pp. 71–73.
13. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000045710.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000457 ↗
14. 10.1177/105678951453144010.1177/1056789514531440 ↗
15. Riedel W, Thoma K and Hiermaier S (1999) Penetration of reinforced concrete by BETA-B-500 numerical analysis using a new macroscopic concrete model for hydrocodes. In: Proceedings of 9th international symposium on interaction of the effects of munitions with structures , pp. 315-322. Germany: Berlin-Strausberg.
16. 10.1177/105678951452407410.1177/1056789514524074 ↗
17. Smith PD · 1994
18. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.12.03110.1016/j.engstruct.2010.12.031 ↗
19. UFC (Unified Facilities Criteria) (2008) Structures to Resist the Effects of Accidental Explosions . Technical Manual 3-340-02. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Army, Navy, and Air Force.
20. Voyiadjis GV · International Journal of Damage Mechanics · 2016
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000044010.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000440 ↗
22. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000022010.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000220 ↗
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000022110.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000221 ↗
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2005)10:1(96)10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2005)10:1(96) ↗
25. 10.1177/105678951455492110.1177/1056789514554921 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0020-7225(02)00378-610.1016/S0020-7225(02)00378-6 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.01.00410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.01.004 ↗