Nonlinear soil deformability effects on the seismic damage mechanisms of brick and stone masonry arch bridges
Source abstract
Abstract
Masonry arch bridges, which were generally built using brick and stone materials, still form a significant part of the highway and railway networks in the World. The subsoil deformability may considerably affect seismic damage mechanics of masonry arch bridges. The paper investigates the effects of nonlinear foundation soil behavior on the seismic damage mechanisms of brick and stone semicircular masonry arch bridges. Direct soil-structure interaction (SSI) approach is taken into account in the 3 D finite element models of the masonry arch bridge-foundation-soil interaction systems including contact, finite and infinite elements. Nonlinear behaviors of masonry units and homogenous soil domain are modeled using the Concrete Damage Plasticity (CDP) and Mohr-Coulomb failure criteria. The selected ground motion is matched and deconvoluted for hard and medium soil domains. Seismic damage mechanisms of brick and stone masonry arch bridges subjected to combined longitudinal and vertical deconvolved ground motion components are obtained for hard, medium, and partially hard and medium soil domains and are compared with each other.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey
Department of Civil Engineering, Bartın University, Bartın, Turkey
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Abaqus v13 (2010) Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp., Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
2. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.05410.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.054 ↗
3. 10.1002/stc.218710.1002/stc.2187 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.04.03010.1016/j.compstruct.2016.04.030 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.02310.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.023 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.05.06310.1016/j.compositesb.2016.05.063 ↗
7. 10.12989/sss.2015.16.1.10110.12989/sss.2015.16.1.101 ↗
8. 10.1080/10286608.2011.58832810.1080/10286608.2011.588328 ↗
9. Ataei S · International Journal of Architectural Heritage · 2017 · 11
10. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.11.00210.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.11.002 ↗
11. Aytulun E, Soyoz S, Karcioglu E (2019) System identification and seismic performance assessment of a stone arch bridge. Journal of Earthquake Engineering : 1–21, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2019.1692740.10.1080/13632469.2019.1692740 ↗
12. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.624.50210.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.624.502 ↗
13. Bati SB · Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions · 2008 · 41 · 1291
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.000006010.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000060 ↗
15. 10.3846/1822-427X.2009.4.177-18510.3846/1822-427X.2009.4.177-185 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.05.00410.1016/j.engstruct.2005.05.004 ↗
17. Bayraktar A, Hökelekli E (2020) Seismic performances of different spandrel wall strengthening techniques in masonry arch bridges. International Journal of Architectural Heritage .10.1080/15583058.2020.1719234 ↗
18. Bayraktar A · Earthquakes and Structures · 2020 · 18 · 83
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.10.04410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.10.044 ↗
20. 10.1080/15583058.2011.60659410.1080/15583058.2011.606594 ↗
21. Bergamo O · Structural Engineering International: Journal of the International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE · 2014 · 24 · 53210.2749/101686614X13854694314289 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.07.01910.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.07.019 ↗
23. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.747.24210.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.747.242 ↗
24. 10.1002/pse.8410.1002/pse.84 ↗
25. 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.000038810.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000388 ↗
26. Boothby TE, Nelson SE, Scolforo ML (1994) A visual classification system for masonry arch failures. In: 10th international brick and block masonry conference , Calgary, Canada, 5–7 July 1994, pp.349–358. The University of Calgary.
27. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000003010.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000030 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.03.00510.1016/j.compositesb.2011.03.005 ↗
29. 10.1007/s13349-017-0242-710.1007/s13349-017-0242-7 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.01510.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.015 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.05.01910.1016/j.compositesb.2011.05.019 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.12.07510.1016/j.compstruct.2017.12.075 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.07.01510.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.07.015 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.12.00210.1016/j.engstruct.2004.12.002 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.01.02810.1016/j.engstruct.2007.01.028 ↗
36. 10.1260/136943302150252410.1260/1369433021502524 ↗
37. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.747.19610.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.747.196 ↗
38. 10.1007/s40091-015-0101-x10.1007/s40091-015-0101-x ↗
39. 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.000036910.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000369 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.01110.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.011 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.03910.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.039 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.05.04410.1016/j.engstruct.2016.05.044 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.10.04010.1016/j.compstruct.2012.10.040 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.03.00210.1016/j.compstruct.2013.03.002 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.01.02410.1016/j.compositesb.2015.01.024 ↗
46. 10.1080/15732479.2015.103114110.1080/15732479.2015.1031141 ↗
47. Daryadel M · Masonry International · 2016 · 29 · 61
48. 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.000073110.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000731 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.09.00110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.09.001 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.02.00410.1016/j.compstruc.2009.02.004 ↗
51. 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.000014010.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000140 ↗
52. 10.3141/1892-0610.3141/1892-06 ↗
53. 10.1016/S0950-0618(00)00069-610.1016/S0950-0618(00)00069-6 ↗
54. 10.1016/S0045-7949(01)00109-210.1016/S0045-7949(01)00109-2 ↗
55. 10.1007/s00004-007-0039-910.1007/s00004-007-0039-9 ↗
56. 10.1177/105678951986599510.1177/1056789519865995 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.00510.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.005 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.01510.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.015 ↗
59. 10.1617/s11527-014-0339-y10.1617/s11527-014-0339-y ↗
60. Gibbons N · ICE Bridge Engineering · 2016 · 169 · 93
61. 10.1007/s12665-016-6230-010.1007/s12665-016-6230-0 ↗
62. Hashash YMA · 2017
63. 10.1016/0020-7683(66)90018-710.1016/0020-7683(66)90018-7 ↗
64. 10.1017/CBO978110705031010.1017/CBO9781107050310 ↗
65. Hökelekli E · Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering · 2019 · 63 · 926
66. 10.1680/geot.1954.4.4.15310.1680/geot.1954.4.4.153 ↗
67. Islami K · Applied Mechanics and Materials · 2012 · 1159
68. 10.1007/s10518-019-00750-w10.1007/s10518-019-00750-w ↗
69. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.05.01710.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.05.017 ↗
70. Kramer S · 1996
71. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.00110.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.001 ↗
72. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:8(892)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:8(892) ↗
73. 10.1016/0141-0296(89)90031-X10.1016/0141-0296(89)90031-X ↗
74. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.07.00810.1016/j.soildyn.2011.07.008 ↗
75. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:6(1641)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:6(1641) ↗
76. 10.1016/0020-7683(89)90050-410.1016/0020-7683(89)90050-4 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.04.01610.1016/j.compstruc.2011.04.016 ↗
78. 10.12989/cac.2016.18.1.09910.12989/cac.2016.18.1.099 ↗
79. 10.1080/15583058.2017.139948210.1080/15583058.2017.1399482 ↗
80. Masciotta M-G · Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale · 2020 · 51 · 423
81. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.07.00810.1016/j.compstruc.2012.07.008 ↗
82. Milankovitch M (1904) Beitrag zur Theorie der Druckkurven . Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde, K.K. technische Hochschule, Vienna.
83. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.05410.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.054 ↗
84. Mittal RK · International Journal of Bridge Engineering (IJBE) · 2017 · 5 · 113
85. 10.1080/15732479.2014.95185910.1080/15732479.2014.951859 ↗
86. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.06710.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.067 ↗
87. 10.1080/1363246000935037210.1080/13632460009350372 ↗
88. Naderi M · Earthquakes and Structures · 2018 · 14 · 297
89. NIST (2012) Soil-structure interaction for building structures. Report No. GCR 12-917-21, prepared by the NEHRP Consultants Joint Venture (a partnership of the Applied Technology Council and Consortium of Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering) for the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Washington, D.C.
90. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000008610.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000086 ↗
91. Page J · 1993
92. Page J (1995) Load tests to collapse on masonry arch bridges: Arch bridges. In: Proceedings of the first international conference on arch bridges , 3-5 September 1995, Bolton, UK.10.1680/ab.20481.0029 ↗
93. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.747.9310.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.747.93 ↗
94. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.04610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.046 ↗
95. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2016.03.01310.1016/j.euromechsol.2016.03.013 ↗
96. Piro A · Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering · 2019
97. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.04.03210.1016/j.soildyn.2018.04.032 ↗
98. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.10972510.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109725 ↗
99. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.10.01610.1016/j.engstruct.2018.10.016 ↗
100. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.09610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.096 ↗