An enhanced direct method for ductile damage measurement
Source abstract
Abstract
Damage measurement of materials is a crucial challenge for researchers and engineers in manufacturing industries. In this study, based on the image processing technique, a developed approach for determining the Lemaitre’s ductile damage parameter by the direct measurement method is proposed. For this purpose, first, the micrographs pictures are provided by a scanning electron microscope to attain the damage evolution behavior of St37 steel. Then, prediction results of the suggested method and the Lemaitre’s direct approach as well as the microhardness technique and also a lately published numerical method in damage propagation, crack initiation, and ductile fracture of a few tensile samples are compared with the corresponding experimental tests. The comparison reveals the higher efficiency and accuracy of the current approach. Therefore, it is concluded that the new presented method is a reliable approach to achieve the Lemaitre’s ductile damage parameter and predict the damage evolution behavior of ductile materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.msea.2019.13877410.1016/j.msea.2019.138774 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.msea.2018.10.01810.1016/j.msea.2018.10.018 ↗
3. ASTM standard E8/E8M. Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. An American National Standard 3: 1–31.
4. ASTM standard, E112, standard test methods for determining average grain size. An American National Standard 3: 1–28.
5. ASTM standard, E3, standard practice for preparation of metallographic specimens. An American National Standard 3: 1–12.
6. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10389210.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103892 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2007.09.00410.1016/j.ijplas.2007.09.004 ↗
8. 10.1115/1.289713510.1115/1.2897135 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0013-7944(97)00074-X10.1016/S0013-7944(97)00074-X ↗
10. 10.1007/s12289-010-0996-510.1007/s12289-010-0996-5 ↗
11. 10.1177/105678952095805310.1177/1056789520958053 ↗
12. Freudenthal A M (1950) The Inelastic Behavior of Engineering Materials and Structures. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
13. 10.1177/1056789521107258110.1177/10567895211072581 ↗
14. 10.1007/s00170-010-2831-z10.1007/s00170-010-2831-z ↗
15. 10.1007/978-94-017-1957-510.1007/978-94-017-1957-5 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.12.03910.1016/j.actamat.2010.12.039 ↗
17. Keeler S, Wa B (1963) Plastic instability and fracture in sheets stretched over rigid punches. ASM Transactions Quarterly 56(11): 25–48.
18. 10.1115/1.316704410.1115/1.3167044 ↗
19. 10.1007/s11740-019-00936-w10.1007/s11740-019-00936-w ↗
20. 10.1016/j.msea.2020.14033210.1016/j.msea.2020.140332 ↗
21. 10.1371/journal.pone.021649310.1371/journal.pone.0216493 ↗
22. 10.1016/0013-7944(87)90059-210.1016/0013-7944(87)90059-2 ↗
23. Lemaitre H. J (2001) Handbook of Materials Behavior Models, Three-Volume Set: nonlinear Models and Properties. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
24. 10.1115/1.322577510.1115/1.3225775 ↗
25. Lemaitre J (2012) A Course on Damage Mechanics. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
26. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.08.00110.1016/j.jmapro.2017.08.001 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.03.18010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.03.180 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.simpat.2010.10.00310.1016/j.simpat.2010.10.003 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2006.10.00410.1016/j.mechmat.2006.10.004 ↗
30. 10.1007/BF0018893910.1007/BF00188939 ↗
31. 10.1007/s11837-020-04404-010.1007/s11837-020-04404-0 ↗
32. 10.3390/met903031910.3390/met9030319 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.00610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.006 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.02.01810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.02.018 ↗
35. 10.1016/0022-5096(84)90031-010.1016/0022-5096(84)90031-0 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.10108510.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101085 ↗
37. 10.1016/0001-6160(88)90232-510.1016/0001-6160(88)90232-5 ↗
38. 10.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-710.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-7 ↗
39. 10.1177/1056789521103649110.1177/10567895211036491 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.10650910.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106509 ↗
41. 10.1080/15397734.2021.190719910.1080/15397734.2021.1907199 ↗
42. 10.1080/15397734.2021.198726310.1080/15397734.2021.1987263 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2015.12.05910.1016/j.matchemphys.2015.12.059 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.04.01710.1016/j.jmrt.2018.04.017 ↗
45. 10.1007/s00419-021-01998-y10.1007/s00419-021-01998-y ↗
46. 10.1007/BF0114155710.1007/BF01141557 ↗
47. 10.1007/BF0004311910.1007/BF00043119 ↗
48. 10.1007/s40799-022-00615-z10.1007/s40799-022-00615-z ↗
49. 10.1002/srin.20170037810.1002/srin.201700378 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2009.08.00310.1016/j.mechmat.2009.08.003 ↗
51. 10.1177/1056789523117140810.1177/10567895231171408 ↗
52. 10.1016/0025-5416(84)90218-010.1016/0025-5416(84)90218-0 ↗