journal article·2025-11Open access

Damage-based initiation and growth of cracks in compacted graphite iron: Comparison of numerical strategies for realistic morphology

Xingling Luo, Xinrui Huang, Konstantinos P Baxevanakis, Phani S Karamched, Vadim V Silberschmidt

Abstract

Compacted graphite iron (CGI) is widely used in automotive engines thanks to its excellent castability and thermal conductivity. Despite extensive research, the influence of its microstructure on the fracture behaviour has not been fully elucidated. In this work, four different damage models with realistic and simplified morphologies are compared. The developed models consider the effect of graphite-particle morphology and the domain’s boundary conditions. The crack path and morphology were characterised with in situ tensile tests inside a scanning electron microscope. Then, finite-element models capturing the actual microstructure morphology were generated, assuming isotropic and ductile properties for the matrix and graphite. Crack initiation was simulated employing the Johnson-Cook damage scheme and cohesive-zone elements. It was found that cracks tended to initiate at the ends of vermicular graphite particles. Besides, small matrix bridges between the neighbouring graphite inclusions facilitated the concentration of high stress, with its level increasing as the spacing decreased. Validation of simulations was based on in situ experimental data. The developed model could assist in the understanding of the mechanical and fracture behaviours of CGI.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Wolfson School of Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering, Loughborough University, UK

College of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, China

University of Oxford

Funding

Chinese Government Scholarship

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. ABAQUS Analysis User’s Manual (2023) Defining the constitutive response of cohesive elements using a traction-separation description.
2. 10.1088/0965-0393/24/5/05501210.1088/0965-0393/24/5/055012 ↗
3. 10.1088/0965-0393/2/3A/00210.1088/0965-0393/2/3A/002 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.10754410.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107544 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.07.02510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.07.025 ↗
6. Camanho PP, Davila CG (2002) Mixed-mode decohesion finite elements for the simulation of delamination in composite materials. NASA Technical Paper 211737: 42.
7. 10.3390/met1303047310.3390/met13030473 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.01.09110.1016/j.ceramint.2022.01.091 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.cma.2019.11275710.1016/j.cma.2019.112757 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.msea.2020.13912510.1016/j.msea.2020.139125 ↗
11. Dawson S, Schroeder T (2000) Compacted graphite iron : a viable alternative. Engineering Casting Solutions AFS 1: 1–10.
12. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.03.03710.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.03.037 ↗
13. Dogra S (2024) SOLIDWORKS 2024: A Power Guide for Beginners and Intermediate Users. CADArtifex. Available at: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=YpDvEAAAQBAJ (accessed 15 March 2024).
14. 10.3390/ma1409214310.3390/ma14092143 ↗
15. 10.1201/b1090310.1201/b10903 ↗
16. 10.1080/09506608.2023.224676610.1080/09506608.2023.2246766 ↗
17. 10.1016/0008-6223(73)90007-910.1016/0008-6223(73)90007-9 ↗
18. 10.1016/0022-5096(63)90036-X10.1016/0022-5096(63)90036-X ↗
19. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.06.01510.1016/j.mechmat.2015.06.015 ↗
20. Johnson GR Cook WH (1983) A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains high strain rates and high temperatures. Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Ballistic The Hague The Netherlands 541–547.
21. 10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-910.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9 ↗
22. 10.1007/978-3-031-18564-9_1110.1007/978-3-031-18564-9_11 ↗
23. Liu P (2021) Cohesive models and implicit finite element analysis for delamination analysis of composite laminates with different fracture modes. In P. Liu (Ed.) Damage modeling of composite structures (pp. 1–26). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820963-9.00014-610.1016/B978-0-12-820963-9.00014-6 ↗
24. 10.3390/ma1713334610.3390/ma17133346 ↗
25. 10.3390/solids501000910.3390/solids5010009 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.msea.2024.14743110.1016/j.msea.2024.147431 ↗
27. 10.1177/105678951984847510.1177/1056789519848475 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11698910.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116989 ↗
29. 10.1007/s00170-011-3157-110.1007/s00170-011-3157-1 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.finel.2018.04.00810.1016/j.finel.2018.04.008 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.04.00210.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.04.002 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.cma.2011.09.01410.1016/j.cma.2011.09.014 ↗
33. 10.1177/105678951142089210.1177/1056789511420892 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2018.11.01910.1016/j.ijplas.2018.11.019 ↗
35. 10.1007/978-3-319-67125-310.1007/978-3-319-67125-3 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.prostr.2020.11.11010.1016/j.prostr.2020.11.110 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.prostr.2022.02.04910.1016/j.prostr.2022.02.049 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.04.04310.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.04.043 ↗
39. 10.1177/105678950935966510.1177/1056789509359665 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.03.11810.1016/j.msea.2016.03.118 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.09.03510.1016/j.msea.2016.09.035 ↗
42. 10.1016/S0143-974X(02)00018-410.1016/S0143-974X(02)00018-4 ↗
43. 10.1177/105678952199754510.1177/1056789521997545 ↗
44. 10.1002/pro.399310.1002/pro.3993 ↗
45. 10.1177/105678951989437910.1177/1056789519894379 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.05.05110.1016/j.jmrt.2020.05.051 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.27910.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.279 ↗
48. 10.1179/13640460422501747410.1179/136404604225017474 ↗
49. 10.1111/ffe.1244910.1111/ffe.12449 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.10697010.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.106970 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.08.00410.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.08.004 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.00810.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.008 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.08.06910.1016/j.carbon.2021.08.069 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.10988210.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.109882 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.02.11110.1016/j.jmrt.2023.02.111 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2021.10449010.1016/j.euromechsol.2021.104490 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.12.07710.1016/j.msea.2017.12.077 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.05.01410.1016/j.jmrt.2020.05.014 ↗