Linking fatigue response of asphalt binders, mastics, and asphalt concrete mixture modified by nano-silica and synthesized polyurethane
Source abstract
Abstract
Asphalt concrete is composed of stone, sand, filler, and asphalt binder. Fatigue can be considered as a phenomenon affecting both the binder (asphalt binder or mastic) and the mixture. The purpose of this study was to investigate the fatigue damage response in asphalt binders, mastics, and asphalt concrete mixtures modified with nano-silica and synthesized polyurethane. The continuum damage mechanics method and phenomenological approaches in this study were used to investigate the fatigue performance. Obtained results indicated that the effect of the synthesized polyurethane on improving the fatigue life was far greater than that of nano-silica. The damage process in asphalt binders differed from that in the mastic and asphalt concrete mixture. Damage intensity parameter is an appropriate criterion for evaluating fatigue performance of asphalt binders and mastics. Concerning the fatigue of asphalt concrete mixture, the results of this study indicated a better convergence between the fatigue parameters of mastics and asphalt concrete mixture compared to asphalt binders, especially with increasing aging. Also, there was greater convergence between the fatigue life of the asphalt concrete mixture and asphalt binder and mastics in the method of continuum damage mechanics as compared to the phenomenological approach.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO R 30-02 · 2015
2. AASHTO T 315-12 · 2012
3. AASHTO T 321 · 2017
4. AASHTO TP 101-12-UL · 2014
5. ASTM-D2872 · 2012
6. ASTM D6521 · 2018
7. Bahia H · 2010
8. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.09310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.093 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.08.03710.1016/j.actbio.2009.08.037 ↗
10. 10.3141/1681-1910.3141/1681-19 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jtte.2015.06.00310.1016/j.jtte.2015.06.003 ↗
12. 10.3141/1832-1610.3141/1832-16 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.03.02810.1016/j.fuproc.2010.03.028 ↗
14. Chehab GR · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists (AAPT). · 2002 · 71 · 559
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.03210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.032 ↗
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000219610.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002196 ↗
17. David AA · 1971
18. 10.1080/14680629.2016.126172810.1080/14680629.2016.1261728 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijprt.2018.02.00310.1016/j.ijprt.2018.02.003 ↗
20. 10.1080/14680629.2010.969029910.1080/14680629.2010.9690299 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijprt.2016.11.00910.1016/j.ijprt.2016.11.009 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jmst.2013.04.00810.1016/j.jmst.2013.04.008 ↗
23. 10.3846/13923730.2017.139656010.3846/13923730.2017.1396560 ↗
24. 10.1007/978-94-017-7342-3_5310.1007/978-94-017-7342-3_53 ↗
25. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000199610.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001996 ↗
26. Gibson NH · 2006
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.18410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.184 ↗
28. Hamed FM · 2010
29. 10.1177/105678951665138310.1177/1056789516651383 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.11910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.119 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.03.01810.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.03.018 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.fuel.2010.10.00210.1016/j.fuel.2010.10.002 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.08810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.088 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jiec.2012.10.02510.1016/j.jiec.2012.10.025 ↗
35. Johnson CM · 2010
36. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2004)16:2(122)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2004)16:2(122) ↗
37. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:1(32)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:1(32) ↗
38. Leiva-Villacorta F · Road Materials and Pavement Design. · 2017 · 20 · 1
39. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000045010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000450 ↗
40. Liu Y (2011) Discrete Element Methods for Asphalt Concrete: Development and Application of User-Defined Microstructural Models and a Viscoelastic Micromechanical Model. Houghton: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan Technological University.
41. Mensching DJ · 2015
42. 10.1016/j.fuel.2007.01.02310.1016/j.fuel.2007.01.023 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.10710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.107 ↗
44. 10.1080/10916466.2016.127658910.1080/10916466.2016.1276589 ↗
45. 10.1177/105678951879982210.1177/1056789518799822 ↗
46. 10.1016/S0167-6636(96)00042-710.1016/S0167-6636(96)00042-7 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.13710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.137 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.08.04310.1016/j.jcis.2004.08.043 ↗
49. 10.1155/2016/593827010.1155/2016/5938270 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.14610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.146 ↗
51. 10.1007/s11043-016-9304-110.1007/s11043-016-9304-1 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.06910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.069 ↗
53. Santagata E · Asphalt Paving Technology: Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists-Proceedings of the Technical Sessions. · 2008 · 77 · 851
54. 10.1080/10916466.2018.147653410.1080/10916466.2018.1476534 ↗
55. 10.1177/105678951561644710.1177/1056789515616447 ↗
56. 10.1177/105678951665850610.1177/1056789516658506 ↗
57. 10.1177/10567895920010030410.1177/105678959200100304 ↗
58. Tian H · 2009
59. 10.3141/2296-0410.3141/2296-04 ↗
60. 10.1080/1029843090339808810.1080/10298430903398088 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.07.04810.1016/j.fuel.2017.07.048 ↗
62. 10.1080/14680629.2014.91496510.1080/14680629.2014.914965 ↗