Baseline-free damage identification of a bridge based on the modal ingredients of the response principal components with limited sensors
Source abstract
Abstract
Bridges are exposed to structural damage under moving vehicle loads, posing potential threats to structural safety. To address the limitations of conventional mode-shape-based damage identification methods, which rely on baseline data and a large number of sensors, this article presents a novel approach based on response principal components under moving loads. Considering vehicle–bridge interaction, this study elucidates the composition of the response's principal components of damaged beams. Initially, the dynamic response of the beam is decomposed using the proper orthogonal decomposition, and the analytical expressions for the principal components of responses are derived. Then, damage identification is conducted, indicating that the principal components of the response for a damaged beam can be decomposed into modal components, dynamic components, and damage components. Moving average filtering is employed in the separation process, thereby extracting the damage component. Numerical simulations and experimental validations are subsequently conducted to assess algorithm performance. This study highlights the role of the damage component within principal components, providing new insights into their physical interpretation in structural damage identification.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Jinan University
Key Laboratory of Marine Civil Engineering Materials and Structures, Ministry of Education of China, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Department of Education of Guangdong Province, The Key Laboratory of Green Toughening and Safety Prevention and Control of Offshore Structures, Guangdong, China
School of Environment and Civil Engineering, Dongguan University of Technology
Curtin University
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/1361-665X/aa550a10.1088/1361-665X/aa550a ↗
2. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.05.02410.1016/j.engstruct.2008.05.024 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.11793610.1016/j.engstruct.2024.117936 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.10981610.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109816 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jsv.2009.02.00210.1016/j.jsv.2009.02.002 ↗
6. 10.1006/jsvi.1997.138610.1006/jsvi.1997.1386 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.11.02110.1016/j.ymssp.2016.11.021 ↗
8. 10.1177/1475921723122425410.1177/14759217231224254 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jsv.2013.01.02410.1016/j.jsv.2013.01.024 ↗
10. 10.1177/107754631456458710.1177/1077546314564587 ↗
11. 10.1142/S021945542471005610.1142/S0219455424710056 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.10416810.1016/j.autcon.2022.104168 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jsv.2005.04.00610.1016/j.jsv.2005.04.006 ↗
14. 10.1142/S021945542042008010.1142/S0219455420420080 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.11936610.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119366 ↗
16. 10.1142/S021945541950109810.1142/S0219455419501098 ↗
17. Mao Q (2016) Vibration analysis of cracked beams using adomian decomposition method and non-baseline damage detection via high-pass filters. International Journal of Acoustics and Vibration 21(2): 170–177.
18. 10.1007/s11709-018-0498-y10.1007/s11709-018-0498-y ↗
19. 10.4236/eng.2017.9200510.4236/eng.2017.92005 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.10501010.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.105010 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jsv.2023.11796610.1016/j.jsv.2023.117966 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.10924610.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109246 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jsv.2025.11901210.1016/j.jsv.2025.119012 ↗
24. 10.1002/stc.184110.1002/stc.1841 ↗
25. 10.1016/0022-460X(91)90595-B10.1016/0022-460X(91)90595-B ↗
26. 10.1139/l92-03210.1139/l92-032 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.apm.2020.09.01210.1016/j.apm.2020.09.012 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jsv.2022.11694310.1016/j.jsv.2022.116943 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0141-0296(96)00149-610.1016/S0141-0296(96)00149-6 ↗
30. 10.1006/jsvi.1998.187810.1006/jsvi.1998.1878 ↗
31. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1216)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1216) ↗
32. Smith SW (1997) The scientist and engineer’s guide to digital signal processing. 2nd edn. California Technical Publishing, 277–284.
33. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.06.00610.1016/j.ymssp.2013.06.006 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.12014810.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120148 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.08.01710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.08.017 ↗
36. 10.1002/stc.51510.1002/stc.515 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0022-460X(02)01077-510.1016/S0022-460X(02)01077-5 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jsv.2017.03.03010.1016/j.jsv.2017.03.030 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.10600510.1016/j.istruc.2024.106005 ↗
40. 10.12989/sss.2014.13.5.79710.12989/sss.2014.13.5.797 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jsv.2004.06.03210.1016/j.jsv.2004.06.032 ↗
42. 10.1002/stc.296810.1002/stc.2968 ↗
43. 10.1007/s13349-019-00325-y10.1007/s13349-019-00325-y ↗
44. 10.1177/1077546323120935710.1177/10775463231209357 ↗