Calculations of intersection cross-slip activation energies in fcc metals using nudged elastic band method
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The nudged elastic band (NEB) method is used to evaluate activation energies for dislocation intersection cross-slip in face-centered cubic (fcc) nickel and copper, to extend our prior work which used an approximate method. In this work we also extend the study by including Hirth locks (HL) in addition to Lomer–Cottrell locks and glide locks (GL). Using atomistic (molecular statics) simulations with embedded atom potentials we evaluated the activation barrier for a dislocation to transform from fully residing on the glide plane to fully residing on the cross-slip plane when intersecting a 120° forest dislocation in both Ni and Cu. The initial separation between the screw and the intersecting dislocation on the (1 1 1) glide plane is varied to find a minimum in the activation energy. The NEB method gives energies that are ∼10% lower than those reported in our prior work. It is estimated that the activation energies for cross-slip from the fully glide plane state to the partially cross-slipped state at the 120° intersection forming GL in Ni and Cu are ∼0.47 and ∼0.65 eV, respectively, and from the fully cross-slip plane state to the partially cross-slipped state forming LC are ∼0.68 and ∼0.67 eV. The activation energies for cross-slip from the fully glide plane state to the partially cross-slipped state at the 120° intersection forming HL in Ni and Cu are estimated to be ∼0.09 and ∼0.31 eV, respectively. These values are a factor of 3–20 lower than the activation energy for bulk cross-slip in Ni and, a factor of 2–6 lower than the activation energy for cross-slip in Cu estimated by Friedel–Escaig analysis. These results suggest that cross-slip should nucleate preferentially at selected screw dislocation intersections in fcc materials and the activation energies for such mechanisms are also a function of stacking fault energy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Puschl · Prog Mater Sci · 2002 · 47 · 41510.1016/S0079-6425(01)00003-2 ↗
2. Jackson · Prog Mater Sci · 1985 · 29 · 13910.1016/0079-6425(85)90009-X ↗
3. Rao · Philos Mag A · 1999 · 79 · 116710.1080/01418619908210354 ↗
4. Rao · Philos Mag · 2009 · 89 · 335110.1080/14786430903286201 ↗
5. Rao · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 554710.1016/j.actamat.2010.06.005 ↗
6. Plimpton · J Comp Phys · 1995 · 117 · 110.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
7. Henkelman · J Chem Phys · 2000 · 113 · 997810.1063/1.1323224 ↗
8. Rodney · Phys Rev B · 2007 · 76 · 14410810.1103/PhysRevB.76.144108 ↗
9. Angelo · Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng · 1995 · 3 · 28910.1088/0965-0393/3/3/001 ↗
10. Mishin · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 145110.1016/j.actamat.2003.11.026 ↗
11. Mishin · Phys Rev B · 2001 · 63 · 22410610.1103/PhysRevB.63.224106 ↗
12. Couteau · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 420710.1016/j.actamat.2011.03.045 ↗
13. Brown · Philos Mag A · 2002 · 82 · 1691
14. Vegge · J Phys Condens Matter · 2002 · 14 · 292910.1088/0953-8984/14/11/309 ↗
15. Rao S, Dimiduk DM, Jaafar El-Awady, Parthasarathy TA, Uchic MD, Woodward C, submitted for publication.
16. Washburn · Appl Phys Lett · 1965 · 7 · 18310.1063/1.1754369 ↗
17. Devincre · Science · 2008 · 320 · 174510.1126/science.1156101 ↗
18. Kocks · Prog Mater Sci · 2003 · 48 · 10210.1016/S0079-6425(02)00003-8 ↗