Numerical simulation of sheet metal blanking based on fully coupled elastoplasticity-damage constitutive equations accounting for yield surface distortion-induced anisotropy
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper deals with the numerical simulation of sheet metal blanking process based on fully coupled elastoplastic model accounting for the induced anisotropies due to the kinematic hardening and the yield surface distortion. The yield surface distortion is assumed to be controlled by the kinematic hardening leading additional extra hardening which enhances the predictive capabilities of the model. Series of finite element-based numerical simulations of blanking process with four kinds of assumed distortional hardening parameters have been conducted. Through the comparison between the experimentally observed responses and the numerically predicted ones with and without the yield surface distortion effect, the significance of the yield surface distortion-induced anisotropy on the estimation of the blanking edge quality has been investigated.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical, Electrical and Information Engineering, Shandong University at Weihai, China
ICD/LASMIS-CNRS-FRE-2848 – University of Technology of Troyes, France
Institute of Forming Technology & Equipment, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.08.03410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.08.034 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.crme.2015.11.00610.1016/j.crme.2015.11.006 ↗
3. 10.1177/105678951663572910.1177/1056789516635729 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.01.00810.1016/j.ijplas.2010.01.008 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.02.00910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.02.009 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2011.03.00310.1016/j.ijplas.2011.03.003 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2012.07.00210.1016/j.ijplas.2012.07.002 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00062-410.1016/S0924-0136(98)00062-4 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0749-6419(03)00046-910.1016/S0749-6419(03)00046-9 ↗
10. 10.1115/1.317366210.1115/1.3173662 ↗
11. 10.3166/ijfp.6.7-3210.3166/ijfp.6.7-32 ↗
12. 10.1177/105678950809754810.1177/1056789508097548 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.02110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.021 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.04.02510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.04.025 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0749-6419(00)00025-510.1016/S0749-6419(00)00025-5 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0020-7403(01)00070-410.1016/S0020-7403(01)00070-4 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0749-6419(97)00024-710.1016/S0749-6419(97)00024-7 ↗
18. 10.1177/105678951039633110.1177/1056789510396331 ↗
19. Lemaitre J · 1985
20. Lemaitre J · 2005
21. 10.1016/S0997-7538(00)00161-310.1016/S0997-7538(00)00161-3 ↗
22. 10.1115/1.360120410.1115/1.3601204 ↗
23. 10.1007/978-94-007-2666-610.1007/978-94-007-2666-6 ↗
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1983)109:4(1042)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1983)109:4(1042) ↗
25. 10.1007/BF0118485310.1007/BF01184853 ↗
26. 10.1177/105678951452407610.1177/1056789514524076 ↗
27. 10.1002/978111856219210.1002/9781118562192 ↗
28. Saanouni K · 2013
29. 10.1177/10567895940030020310.1177/105678959400300203 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.03.02710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.03.027 ↗
31. Voyiadjis GZ · International Journal of Damage Mechanics · 2008 · 18 · 603
32. 10.1016/0749-6419(91)90019-U10.1016/0749-6419(91)90019-U ↗
33. 10.1016/S0749-6419(96)00038-110.1016/S0749-6419(96)00038-1 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2005.01.00410.1016/j.ijplas.2005.01.004 ↗
35. Yue Z · 2014
36. 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.10310.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.103 ↗
37. Yue Z · International Journal of Damage Mechanics · 2014