A Probabilistic Mechanical Model for Simulating the Fatigue Failure Process in Metals
Source abstract
Abstract
A model for simulating fatigue damage accumulation and the fatigue failure process in metals is presented. The simulation is achieved by modeling material behavior with a series of nonlinear mechanical springs with randomized behavior. With each applied stress, a certain number of springs rupture. The damage accumulation process is modeled by the number of springs that have ruptured during the entire stress application cycle. When a sufficiently large number of springs rupture, the entire system is considered to have failed. This constitutes fatigue failure. This article follows two previous publications by the first two authors and extends the model further by incorporating additional random variables, investigating the significance of uncertainty in the spring behavior and simulation of the hysteresis behavior of metals during the fatigue damage accumulation process. Results similar to (1) the Wöhler S—N curve and (2) the hysteresis loss versus the number of stress cycle relationship, observed in laboratory testing of metal specimens, are presented.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois, USA,
PDC Engineers, Inc., Anchorage, Alaska, USA
References (12)
Show source-provided references
1. Guralnick, S.A. · International Association of Bridge and Structural Engineers · 1975 · 35 · 83
2. Guralnick, S.A. and Mohammadi, J. ( 2002). The Origin and Inception of Fatigue in Steel - A Probabilistic Model, In: Gdoutos, E.E. (ed.), Recent Advances in Experimental Mechanics, Netherlands , Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 187-196.10.1007/0-306-48410-2_18 ↗
3. Guralnick, S.A.
4. Jackel, H.R. · Sound and Vibration · 1970 · 4 · 18
5. Jenkin, C.F. · Engineering · 1922 · 114 · 603
6. Kephart, A.M. · 2006
7. Khisty, C.J. and Mohammadi, J. ( 2001). Fundamentals of Systems Engineering with Economics, Probability and Statistics, Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall, pp. 186-189.
8. Martin, J.F. · Materials Research and Standards · 1971 · 11 · 23
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(1998)3:3(128)10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(1998)3:3(128) ↗
10. Pook, L. ( 2007). Metal Fatigue, What it is Why it Matters, In: Gladwell, G.M.L (eds), Solid Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 145, New York, Springer, pp. 18-22 and 44-50.
11. Puskar, A. and Golovin, S.A. ( 1985). Fatigue in Materials: Cumulative Damage Processes , New York, Elsevier Science Publishing, Inc., p. 187.
12. Timoshenko, S.P. ( 1956). Strength of Materials, Vol. II, 3rd edn, Van Nostrand Company, Inc, Princeton, NJ, pp. 413 and 514.