journal article·2025-05

Blast response and damage assessment of reinforced concrete slabs using convolutional neural networks

Bilal Ahmed, Taehyo Park, Jong-Su Jeon

Publisher page

Abstract

Concrete structures are essential for shelters, storage, transportation, and defense systems. However, they are vulnerable to terrorist attacks and explosions. The most exposed component of these structures is the reinforced concrete slab, which is also the primary force-transferring member. Therefore, the present study utilizes machine learning techniques to predict the maximum vertical displacement of reinforced concrete slabs subjected to air-blast loading. This can be achieved using 11 input parameters of the slab and TNT blast to predict the maximum displacement. The dataset comprises 146 samples from various experimental and numerical blast studies on reinforced concrete slabs in the open literature. Rather than presenting the data in a tabular format, each individual data sample is transformed into an image using distinct techniques: one uses a self-similarity matrix, and the other utilizes an image generator for the tabular data. Image generation transforms tabular data into images by assigning features to pixel positions. This results in spatial dependency of the input features. Using these images, various convolutional neural networks were adopted (ResNet-18, ResNet-50, ResNet-101, EfficentNet-b0, ShuffleNet, Xception, DarkNet-53, and DenseNet-20) and trained to predict the slab maximum displacement. Most models demonstrated promising results. The performance of the models was predicted based on the root mean squared error, mean absolute error, and coefficient of determination, and the impact of input features on the maximum displacement was examined. Along with this, the initial study of the blast damage assessment on reinforced concrete slabs is explained for future work to be performed based on the proposed method.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Geophysical Methods and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea

References (77)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.2495/SUSI14002110.2495/SUSI140021 ↗
2. Ali MK, Kim D, Kim TH (2022) Learning task agnostic temporal consistency correction. arXiv: 2206.03753.
3. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.294237510.1109/ACCESS.2019.2942375 ↗
4. Ali MK, Yu S, Kim TH (2020) Deep motion blind video stabilization. arXiv: 2011.09697.
5. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.11110910.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111109 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.10414510.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.104145 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.10437810.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104378 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.04.00710.1016/j.istruc.2022.04.007 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.01.10210.1016/j.istruc.2021.01.102 ↗
10. 10.1136/bmj.324.7344.101810.1136/bmj.324.7344.1018 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41467-020-18197-y10.1038/s41467-020-18197-y ↗
12. 10.1080/0020717920893431710.1080/00207179208934317 ↗
13. 10.1109/72.39225210.1109/72.392252 ↗
14. Chollet F (2017) Xception: Deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE Honolulu HI USA pp. 1800–1807.10.1109/CVPR.2017.195 ↗
15. Christiansen NH, Høgsberg J, Winther O (2011) Artificial neural networks for nonlinear dynamic response simulation in mechanical systems. Proceedings of the 24th Nordic Seminar on Computational Mechanics: 77–80.
16. 10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.10.00110.1016/j.strusafe.2014.10.001 ↗
17. 10.1007/s12209-009-0012-710.1007/s12209-009-0012-7 ↗
18. Dwibedi D Aytar Y Tompson J et al. (2020) Counting out time: Class agnostic video repetition counting in the wild. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE Seattle WA USA pp. 10387–10396.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.01040 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.07410.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.074 ↗
20. 10.1111/mice.1236310.1111/mice.12363 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.07.00810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.07.008 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.apor.2008.01.00210.1016/j.apor.2008.01.002 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.02.01410.1016/j.compstruct.2011.02.014 ↗
24. He K Zhang X Ren S Sun J. (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE Las Vegas NV USA pp. 770–778.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
25. 10.1016/0893-6080(91)90009-T10.1016/0893-6080(91)90009-T ↗
26. 10.1002/eqe.21910.1002/eqe.219 ↗
27. Huang G Liu Z Van Der Maaten L et al. (2017) Densely connected convolutional networks. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE Honolulu HI USA pp. 2261–2269.10.1109/CVPR.2017.243 ↗
28. 10.1109/MCSE.2007.5510.1109/MCSE.2007.55 ↗
29. Jacques E (2011) Blast retrofit of reinforced concrete walls and slabs. Ph.D. thesis University of Ottawa.
30. 10.1155/2014/71870210.1155/2014/718702 ↗
31. Johnson GR Cook WH (1983) A Constitutive Model and Data for Metals Subjected To Large Strains High Strain Rates and High Temperatures. Proceedings 7th International Symposium on Ballistics The Hague. Hague Netherlands: Seventh International Symposium on Ballistics; 1983 The Hague pp. 541–547.
32. 10.1145/306538610.1145/3065386 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.05.03310.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.05.033 ↗
34. 10.1016/0165-0114(95)00293-610.1016/0165-0114(95)00293-6 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.06610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.066 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.06910.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.069 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.05.04510.1016/j.matdes.2015.05.045 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.08.03210.1016/j.engstruct.2015.08.032 ↗
39. Ma S, Zhang ZJ (2018) OmicsMapNet: Transforming omics data to take advantage of deep convolutional neural network for discovery. arXiv: 1804.05283.
40. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.10210.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.102 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.01.05310.1016/j.engstruct.2018.01.053 ↗
42. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000240210.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002402 ↗
43. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000279310.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002793 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.08510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.085 ↗
45. 10.1115/1.400427810.1115/1.4004278 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11326310.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113263 ↗
47. Oesterle MG (2009) Blast simulator wall tests: experimental methods and mitigation strategies for reinforced concrete and concrete masonry. PhD Thesis University of California San Diego.
48. 10.1038/s41746-018-0029-110.1038/s41746-018-0029-1 ↗
49. 10.1007/s10916-019-1475-210.1007/s10916-019-1475-2 ↗
50. Redmon J, Farhadi AJapa (2018) Yolov3: an incremental improvement. arXiv: 1804.02767.
51. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.12.00810.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.12.008 ↗
52. 10.1038/s41598-019-47765-610.1038/s41598-019-47765-6 ↗
53. 10.1088/1742-6596/628/1/01206510.1088/1742-6596/628/1/012065 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.06.01510.1016/j.compositesb.2006.06.015 ↗
55. Simard PY Steinkraus D Platt JC. (2003) Best practices for convolutional neural networks applied to visual document analysis. Seventh International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition. IEEE Edinburgh UK pp. 958–963.10.1109/ICDAR.2003.1227801 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.istruc.2018.03.00910.1016/j.istruc.2018.03.009 ↗
57. Szegedy C Liu W Jia Y et al. (2015) Going deeper with convolutions IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE Boston MA USA pp. 1–9.10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298594 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2011.11.00210.1016/j.tafmec.2011.11.002 ↗
59. Tan M Le Q (2019) Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. International conference on machine learning. PMLR Long Beach California USA pp. 6105–6114.
60. 10.1038/s41591-018-0300-710.1038/s41591-018-0300-7 ↗
61. 10.3390/ma1518644910.3390/ma15186449 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.03.01010.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.03.010 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.07.01010.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.07.010 ↗
64. 10.21105/joss.0302110.21105/joss.03021 ↗
65. 10.1186/s40537-016-0043-610.1186/s40537-016-0043-6 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.03.02010.1016/j.engstruct.2009.03.020 ↗
67. 10.3390/app1117825810.3390/app11178258 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.04.02710.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.04.027 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11310610.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113106 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.05710.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.057 ↗
71. Ying W Chong W Hui L et al. (2009) Artificial Neural Network Prediction for Seismic Response of Bridge Structure. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computational Intelligence. IEEE Shanghai China pp. 503–506.10.1109/AICI.2009.303 ↗
72. Zhang X, Zhou X, Lin M, et al. (2018) Shufflenet: An extremely efficient convolutional neural network for mobile devices. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition : 6848–6856.
73. 10.1016/j.tws.2018.11.01310.1016/j.tws.2018.11.013 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11510410.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115104 ↗
75. 10.1038/s41598-021-90923-y10.1038/s41598-021-90923-y ↗
76. 10.1038/nmeth.295610.1038/nmeth.2956 ↗
77. 10.1093/jnci/djv12910.1093/jnci/djv129 ↗