Generalization of load–unload and force-release sequentially linear methods
Source abstract
Abstract
Two different non-iterative solving approaches for mechanical systems composed of elements with saw-tooth constitutive laws have been described in the literature. The first algorithm called the load–unload ( L–U) method removes the whole external load after every rupture event and linearly increases it again from zero until the next rupture event occurs. The second algorithm, called the force-release ( F-R) method, keeps the load unchanged after a rupture and redistributes the stresses from damaged elements until an equilibrium state has been reached. Then, the load may increase again. It is known that these two algorithms yield different results with respect to crack paths and force–deflection curves, even for proportional loading paths. It will be shown that these two algorithms can be taken as extreme cases of a general approach that is developed in this paper. The general method is based on the simultaneous redistribution of stresses from damaged elements together with the scaling of external load. Both the L–U and F-R algorithms can be reproduced by the general method and thus compared within one framework. The general method also allows the tracing of snap-backs and enables the simulation to be controlled indirectly, e.g. via crack mouth opening displacement. It is applicable to both proportional and non-proportional load paths.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Institute of Structural Mechanics, Brno University of Technology, Veveří, Brno, Czech Republic
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Bažant Z and Planas J (1998) Fracture and Size Effect in Concrete and Other Quasibrittle Materials . Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
2. 10.1016/j.cma.2005.04.02010.1016/j.cma.2005.04.020 ↗
3. 10.1108/0264440981024415610.1108/02644409810244156 ↗
4. 10.1111/0885-9507.0017710.1111/0885-9507.00177 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0013-7944(98)00069-110.1016/S0013-7944(98)00069-1 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.07.00310.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.07.003 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.05.01810.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.05.018 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.06.01910.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.06.019 ↗
9. 10.1007/s10704-012-9677-310.1007/s10704-012-9677-3 ↗
10. 10.1007/s10704-012-9768-110.1007/s10704-012-9768-1 ↗
11. 10.1108/EC-May-2012-010510.1108/EC-May-2012-0105 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.39.63710.1103/PhysRevB.39.637 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.01.03110.1016/j.engstruct.2011.01.031 ↗
14. Iturrioz I, Lacidogna G and Carpinteri A (2014) Acoustic emission detection in concrete specimens: Experimental analysis and lattice model simulations. Int J Damage Mech 23(3): 327–358.10.1177/1056789513494232 ↗
15. 10.1007/BF0003476310.1007/BF00034763 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.05.00710.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.05.007 ↗
17. 10.1016/0029-5493(78)90217-010.1016/0029-5493(78)90217-0 ↗
18. 10.1007/s00024-002-8716-910.1007/s00024-002-8716-9 ↗
19. 10.1007/s00466-007-0221-710.1007/s00466-007-0221-7 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2009.06.00410.1016/j.tafmec.2009.06.004 ↗
21. 10.1177/105678951142458510.1177/1056789511424585 ↗
22. 10.1177/105678951348596610.1177/1056789513485966 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2007.11.00310.1016/j.mechmat.2007.11.003 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.03.02710.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.03.027 ↗
25. 10.1002/nag.37110.1002/nag.371 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0013-7944(97)00010-610.1016/S0013-7944(97)00010-6 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cma.2013.06.00510.1016/j.cma.2013.06.005 ↗
28. van Mier JGM (1996) Fracture Processes of Concrete . Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
29. van Mier JGM (2013) Concrete Fracture: A Multiscale Approach . Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.10.1201/b12968 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01128-010.1016/S0045-7825(96)01128-0 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0013-7944(02)00222-910.1016/S0013-7944(02)00222-9 ↗
32. 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2005.00407.x10.1111/j.1467-8667.2005.00407.x ↗