journal article·2026-06-03

Damage mechanisms in bioinspired helicoidal glass fiber-reinforced epoxy composite laminates for enhanced control of mechanical properties compared to cross-ply laminates

Mahesh, K. Prem Swaroop, Prashant Rawat

Publisher page

Abstract

This experimental investigation applies the principles of the single-helicoidal Bouligand structure to design stacking sequences that tailor the mechanical strength properties and failure mechanism of glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) composite laminates. Four laminate designs with pitch angles of 5°, 8°, 12°, and 15° were fabricated using the vacuum bagging process. All four pitch angles were characterized under flexural loading to identify the optimal flexural pitch angle. Three pitch angles (5°, 8°, and 12°) were compared under low-velocity impact and short beam shear loading. Two pitch angles (5° and 12°) were compared under uniaxial in-plane compression. The performance of these sequences is compared to that of a conventional cross-ply laminate design. The results indicate that the pitch angles significantly affect the strength properties of GFRP laminates. This effect is more pronounced under quasi-static loading compared to low-velocity impact loading. The optimal pitch angle is 12° for flexural and compression loading. It is 8° for short beam shear. It is 5° for low-velocity impact loading. The 5° showed slightly higher impact strength than the cross-ply laminate. The 12° laminate showed compressive strength comparable to the cross-ply laminate. Pitch angle can therefore be used as a design parameter to tailor the mechanical properties of helicoidal GFRP laminates for specific loading requirements.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Cellular and Composite Structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Chaoyang University of Technology

Indian Institute of Technology Madras

Funding

IC & SR, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, India

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.10726110.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.107261 ↗
2. 10.1080/1537649050034380810.1080/15376490500343808 ↗
3. 10.1080/1537649050034380810.1080/15376490500343808 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.matt.2021.07.01210.1016/j.matt.2021.07.012 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0040-8166(72)80042-910.1016/S0040-8166(72)80042-9 ↗
6. 10.1016/0010-4361(91)90549-V10.1016/0010-4361(91)90549-V ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.06.04210.1016/j.matdes.2010.06.042 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.msea.2005.11.06910.1016/j.msea.2005.11.069 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.11.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2010.11.009 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.11.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2010.11.009 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.10824810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108248 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11861410.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118614 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20080121910.1002/adma.200801219 ↗
14. Fragoudakis R (2019) Strengths and Limitations of Traditional Theoretical Approaches to FRP Laminate Design against Failure. In: Thanapalan K (ed.). Rijeka: IntechOpen p. Ch. 1.10.5772/intechopen.89729 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.09710.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.097 ↗
16. 10.1007/BF0255633010.1007/BF02556330 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10983610.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109836 ↗
18. 10.1007/BF0232136210.1007/BF02321362 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.03410.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.034 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.10.06210.1016/j.jmrt.2020.10.062 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2023.11024910.1016/j.compscitech.2023.110249 ↗
22. 10.1177/00219983880220070610.1177/002199838802200706 ↗
23. 10.3390/polym1403047510.3390/polym14030475 ↗
24. 10.1177/0950660824125249810.1177/09506608241252498 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.coco.2020.10060210.1016/j.coco.2020.100602 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10866910.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108669 ↗
27. 10.1002/pc.2841710.1002/pc.28417 ↗
28. 10.1002/pc.2986910.1002/pc.29869 ↗
29. 10.1111/jfb.1494010.1111/jfb.14940 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.12.00310.1016/j.actbio.2020.12.003 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10867710.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108677 ↗
32. 10.1177/1056789521106817610.1177/10567895211068176 ↗
33. 10.1177/002199831559659410.1177/0021998315596594 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.04.04710.1016/j.actbio.2019.04.047 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.06.01010.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.06.010 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.10995210.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109952 ↗
37. 10.1177/1464420724130954810.1177/14644207241309548 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10865010.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108650 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jmps.2019.07.00110.1016/j.jmps.2019.07.001 ↗
40. 10.1002/adem.20118005710.1002/adem.201180057 ↗