Understanding the Performance of Multilane Expressway Exit Design and a Traffic Organization Strategy Based on VISSIM Micro-Simulation and a Comprehensive Evaluation Method
Source abstract
Abstract
Frequent consecutive lane changes and the barrier effect produced by trucks can always contribute to rapid access to the capacity bottleneck at expressway exits, thereby reducing operational performance. This paper proposes to retrofit the conventional interchange design to reduce lane changes and compares them with conventional design and passenger vehicle and truck separation (PVTS) design from multiple fields via VISSIM numerical simulation, which is developed and calibrated with traffic data collected on the eight-lane expressway in China at four levels of service (LOS). Comprehensive evaluation (CE) results reveal that the PVTS strategy improves operational performance by 10–20% at multilane expressway exits, while lane separation around interchanges also yields a similar gain. However, ramps on both the left and right sides show less effective improvement and are even negative at LOS-A and LOS-B. All PVTS and improved designs produce a better comprehensive improvement ratio with a LOS decrease, and improved designs achieve optimal performance below LOS-B with construction cost taken into consideration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Traffic control and management · Transportation Planning and Optimization · Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
CCCC Guangzhou Dredging Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510290, China
Highway Academy, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
Funding
Shaanxi Provincial Education Department
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. The bottleneck mechanism of a freeway diverge10.1016/S0965-8564(01)00017-9 ↗
2. Zhou, X., Pan, B., and Shao, Y. (2021). Evaluating the Impact of Sight Distance and Geometric Alignment on Driver Performance in Freeway Exits Diverging Area Based on Simulated Driving Data. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13116368 ↗
3. Modeling Freeway Diverging Behavior on Deceleration Lanes10.3141/2012-04 ↗
4. How Lane Arrangements on Freeway Mainlines and Ramps Affect Safety of Freeways with Closely Spaced Entrance and Exit Ramps10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000127 ↗
5. Meta-Analysis of Crash-Risk Factors in Freeway Entrance and Exit Areas10.1061/JTEPBS.0000082 ↗
6. Types and characteristics of ramp-related motor vehicle crashes on urban interstate roadways in Northern Virginia10.1016/j.jsr.2003.09.019 ↗
7. Analysis of Crash Risks by Collision Type at Freeway Diverge Area Using Multivariate Modeling Technique10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000757 ↗
8. Safety factors of exit slip roads on China’s urban motorways
9. Quantifying on-road vehicle emissions during traffic congestion using updated emission factors of light-duty gasoline vehicles and real-world traffic monitoring big data10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157581 ↗
10. Filocamo, B., Ruiz, J.A., and Sotelo, M.A. (2020). Efficient Management of Road Intersections for Automated Vehicles-The FRFP System Applied to the Various Types of Intersections and Roundabouts. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10010316 ↗
11. Vehicle emissions in congestion: Comparison of work zone, rush hour and free-flow conditions10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.01.030 ↗
12. Vehicle restrictions and CO2 emissions in Beijing—A simple projection using available data10.1016/j.trd.2015.09.020 ↗
13. Environmental sustainability of the Nigeria transport sector through decomposition and decoupling analysis with future framework for sustainable transport pathways10.1016/j.egyr.2021.05.044 ↗
14. Traffic behavior near an off ramp in the cellular automaton traffic model10.1103/PhysRevE.69.056105 ↗
15. Safety performance of freeway sections and relation to length of speed-change lanes10.1139/L07-135 ↗
16. Optimal and robust strategies for freeway traffic management under demand and supply uncertainties: An overview and general theory
17. Reforming Road User Charges: A Research Challenge for Regional Science10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00639.x ↗
18. Can driving-restriction policies alleviate traffic congestion? A case study in Beijing, China10.1007/s10098-022-02377-z ↗
19. Assessing the effects of non-local traffic restriction policy on urban air quality10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.11.005 ↗
20. Lee, S.M., Shokri, A.A., and Al-Mansour, A.I. (2019). Evaluation of the Applicability of the Ramp Metering to a Freeway Using Microsimulation: A Case Study in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9204406 ↗
21. Gunther, G.E., Coeymans, J.E., Munoz, J.C., and Herrera, J.C. (2011, January 18–20). Mitigating Freeway Off-Ramp Congestion: A surface streets coordinated approach. Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory (ISTTT) in Honor of Carlos F. Daganzo, Berkeley, CA, USA.10.1016/j.trc.2011.05.004 ↗
22. A Macroscopic Model for Freeway Weaving Sections10.1111/mice.12119 ↗
23. Safety analysis of Florida urban limited access highways with special focus on the influence of truck lane restriction policy10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2008)134:7(297) ↗
24. Rakha, H., Flintsch, A.M., Ahn, K.H., El-Shawarby, I., and Arafeh, M. (2005). Freeway Operations, High-Occupancy Vehicle Systems, Traffic Signal Systems, and Regional Transportation Systems Management 2005, Transportation Research Board National Research Council.
25. Xia, X.M., Ma, X.D., and Wang, J. (2019). Control Method for Signalized Intersection with Integrated Waiting Area. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9050968 ↗
26. Evaluation and Analysis Model of the Length of Added Displaced Left-Turn Lane Based on Entropy Evaluation Method10.1155/2021/2688788 ↗
27. Liu, Y.T., Pan, B.H., Zhang, Z.L., Zhang, R.Y., and Shao, Y. (2022). Evaluation of Design Method for Highway Adjacent Tunnel and Exit Connection Section Length Based on Entropy Method. Entropy, 24.10.3390/e24121794 ↗
28. Utilizing UAV video data for in-depth analysis of drivers’ crash risk at interchange merging areas10.1016/j.aap.2018.11.010 ↗
29. Development of a VISSIM Simulation Model for U-Turns at Unsignalized Intersections10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000438 ↗
30. Estimating Project-Level Vehicle Emissions with Vissim and MOVES-Matrix10.3141/2570-12 ↗
31. Event-based road safety assessment: A novel approach towards risk microsimulation in roundabouts10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108192 ↗
32. Zhao, X.J., Liang, C.X., Zhang, N., and Shang, P.J. (2019). Quantifying the Multiscale Predictability of Financial Time Series by an Information-Theoretic Approach. Entropy, 21.10.3390/e21070684 ↗
33. Inherent Fuzzy Entropy for the Improvement of EEG Complexity Evaluation10.1109/TFUZZ.2017.2666789 ↗
34. An integrated CRITIC-TOPSIS- and Entropy-TOPSIS-based informative weighting and ranking approach for evaluating green energy sources and its experimental analysis on pyrolysis10.1007/s11356-022-20219-9 ↗
35. Evaluating Operational Features of Multilane Turbo Roundabouts with an Entropy Method10.1061/JTEPBS.0000684 ↗
36. Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H ↗
37. Shao, M.H., Xie, C.C., Sun, L.J., Wan, X.M., and Chen, Z. (2019). Left-Side On-Ramp Metering for Improving Safety and Efficiency in Underground Expressway Systems. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11123247 ↗
38. Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation
39. Neural network aided Kalman filtering for multitarget tracking applications10.1016/S0045-7906(00)00013-6 ↗
40. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (2018). A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. [7th ed.].
41. Pan, B.H., Luo, S.S., Ying, J.F., Shao, Y., Liu, S.R., Li, X., and Lei, J.Q. (2021). Evaluation and Analysis of CFI Schemes with Different Length of Displaced Left-Turn Lanes with Entropy Method. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13126917 ↗
42. Xiang, Y., Li, Z., Wang, W., Chen, J., Wang, H., and Li, Y. (2016). Evaluating the Operational Features of an Unconventional Dual-Bay U-Turn Design for Intersections. PLoS ONE, 11.10.1371/journal.pone.0158914 ↗