journal article·2012-08

Sample size matters for Al88Fe7Gd5 metallic glass: Smaller is stronger

C.-C. Wang, J. Ding, Y.-Q. Cheng, J.-C. Wan, L. Tian, J. Sun, Z.-W. Shan, Ju Li, E. Ma

Acta Materialia· Volume 60· Issue 13-14
Publisher page

Abstract

For metallic single crystals with dimensions in the micrometer and sub-micrometer regime, systematic studies have established that sample size has an obvious influence on the apparent strength, following a “smaller is stronger” trend. For amorphous metals, several metallic glasses (MG) appear to exhibit a similar trend, while a few others do not. Here, another MG is examined, Al88Fe7Gd5, using quantitative in situ tensile and compression tests inside electron microscopes, with sample effective diameter covering a wide range (100 nm to 3 lm). A clearly elevated strength is observed, as high as about twice the value of bulk samples, for samples with diameters approaching 100 nm. A size regime is proposed, where the strength is controlled by the nucleation of the shear band, starting from its embryonic stage: the smaller the sample size, the more difficult this nucleation becomes. The size dependence is also discussed from an energy balance perspective: the resulting simple power law fits the data as well as other published strength data for a number of MG systems.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Greer · MRS Bull · 2007 · 32 · 61110.1557/mrs2007.121 ↗
2. Schuh · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 406710.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.052 ↗
3. Kumar · Nature · 2009 · 457 · 86810.1038/nature07718 ↗
4. Guo · Nat Mater · 2007 · 6 · 73510.1038/nmat1984 ↗
5. Volkert · J Appl Phys · 2008 · 103 · 610.1063/1.2884584 ↗
6. Jang · Nat Mater · 2010 · 9 · 21510.1038/nmat2622 ↗
7. Deng · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 651110.1016/j.actamat.2011.05.035 ↗
8. Yavari · Phys Rev B · 2010 · 82 · 17220210.1103/PhysRevB.82.172202 ↗
9. Shan · Phys Rev B · 2008 · 77 · 6
10. Chen · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 18910.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.070 ↗
11. Bharathula · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 578910.1016/j.actamat.2010.06.054 ↗
12. Yang · JOM · 2010 · 62 · 9310.1007/s11837-010-0039-1 ↗
13. Kumar · Adv Mater · 2011 · 23 · 46110.1002/adma.201002148 ↗
14. Uchic · Science · 2004 · 305 · 98610.1126/science.1098993 ↗
15. Greer · Prog Mater Sci · 2011 · 56 · 65410.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.01.005 ↗
16. Greer · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 182110.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.031 ↗
17. Dimiduk · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 406510.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.023 ↗
18. Zhu · Prog Mater Sci · 2010 · 55 · 71010.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.04.001 ↗
19. Schuster · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 509110.1016/j.actamat.2008.06.028 ↗
20. Jang · Int J Plast · 2011 · 27 · 85810.1016/j.ijplas.2010.09.010 ↗
21. Yang · J Mater Res · 2010 · 25 · 56310.1557/JMR.2010.0058 ↗
22. Wu · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 356210.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.013 ↗
23. Bharathula · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 719910.1016/j.actamat.2011.08.008 ↗
24. Lai · Scripta Mater · 2008 · 58 · 89010.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.01.009 ↗
25. Dubach · Scripta Mater · 2009 · 60 · 56710.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.12.013 ↗
26. Ye · Intermetallics · 2010 · 18 · 38510.1016/j.intermet.2009.08.011 ↗
27. Lee · Appl Phys Lett · 2007 · 91 · 16191310.1063/1.2800313 ↗
28. Kuzmin · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 88910.1016/j.actamat.2011.11.023 ↗
29. Shi · Appl Phys Lett · 2010 · 96 · 12190910.1063/1.3340908 ↗
30. Tian · Nat Commun · 2012 · 3 · 60910.1038/ncomms1619 ↗
31. Shan · Nat Mater · 2008 · 7 · 11510.1038/nmat2085 ↗
32. Yang · Scripta Mater · 2009 · 61 · 42310.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.04.035 ↗
33. Inoue · Prog Mater Sci · 1998 · 43 · 36510.1016/S0079-6425(98)00005-X ↗
34. Zheng · Nat Commun · 2010 · 1 · 2410.1038/ncomms1021 ↗
35. Yang · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 161310.1016/j.actamat.2008.11.043 ↗
36. Ye · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 603710.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.029 ↗
37. Cheng · Prog Mater Sci · 2011 · 56 · 37910.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.12.002 ↗
38. Johnson · Phys Rev Lett · 2005 · 95 · 19550110.1103/PhysRevLett.95.195501 ↗
39. Shimizu · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 429310.1016/j.actamat.2006.05.024 ↗
40. Han · Scripta Mater · 2009 · 61 · 92310.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.07.038 ↗
41. Cheng · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 180010.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.046 ↗
42. Falk · Phys Rev E · 1998 · 57 · 719210.1103/PhysRevE.57.7192 ↗
43. Sevillano · Mater Sci Eng A – Struct Mater Prop Microstruct Process · 2001 · 309 · 39310.1016/S0921-5093(00)01733-0 ↗
44. Chen · Phys Rev B · 2011 · 83 · 18020110.1103/PhysRevB.83.180201 ↗
45. Jiang · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 409510.1016/S1359-6454(03)00229-5 ↗
46. Klaumünzer · Phys Rev Lett · 2011 · 107 · 18550210.1103/PhysRevLett.107.185502 ↗
47. Klaumuenzer · J Mater Res · 2011 · 26 · 145310.1557/jmr.2011.178 ↗
48. Yang · Intermetallics · 2011 · 19 · 100510.1016/j.intermet.2011.03.003 ↗
49. Yang · Appl Phys Lett · 2010 · 96 · 01190510.1063/1.3290246 ↗