journal article·2022-08-30Open access

Seismic Liquefaction of Saturated Calcareous Sands: Dynamic Centrifuge Test and Numerical Simulation

Weiqing Lyu, Yong Yuan, Pingshan Chen, Xiaocong Liang, Jiangxu Deng, Chong Li

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 17

Abstract

Both a dynamic centrifuge test and dynamic finite element analysis were carried out to assess the seismic liquefaction risk of a saturated-calcareous-sand site in a port project in Timor-Leste. Taking the in situ calcareous sands as the model material, two groups of horizontal free-field model tests for medium dense and dense saturated calcareous sands were completed based on the two-stage scaling law theory. Three natural earthquake records with varied peak accelerations were adopted as input motions. The experimental results indicate that the shallower the depth, the lower the relative density, the longer the seismic duration, the larger the peak acceleration, and the more susceptible the saturated site to liquefaction. The sands on site at a depth of five to ten meters is highly risky for liquefaction with the excess pore pressure ratio reaching up to about 1.0 under the seismic peak acceleration of 0.3 g. The risk of liquefaction for site sands is rather small under the seismic peak acceleration of 0.1 g. The study reveals the characteristics of the pore pressure development in sites of varied relative densities under different seismic loadings, which provides a scientific basis for the liquefaction risk assessment of the engineering site.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

CCCC Fourth Harbor Engineering Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510290, China

Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai 519082, China

Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

State Key Laboratory for Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

CCCC Fourth Harbor Engineering Institute Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510230, China

School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Innovation Group Project of Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai)

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Avilés-Campoverde, D., Chunga, K., Ortiz-Hernández, E., Vivas-Espinoza, E., Toulkeridis, T., Morales-Delgado, A., and Delgado-Toala, D. (2020). Seismically Induced Soil Liquefaction and Geological Conditions in the City of Jama due to the M7. 8 Pedernales Earthquake in 2016, NW Ecuador. Geosciences, 11.10.3390/geosciences11010020 ↗
2. An overview of the impacts of the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquakes10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.01.014 ↗
3. Chiaro, G., Koseki, J., and Kiyota, T. (2017). An Investigation on the Liquefaction-Induced Sloped Ground Failure during the 1964 Niigata Earthquake. Geotechnical Hazards from Large Earthquakes and Heavy Rainfalls, Springer.10.1007/978-4-431-56205-4_12 ↗
4. Liquefied gravity flow-induced tsunami: First evidence and comparison from the 2018 Indonesia Sulawesi earthquake and tsunami disasters10.1007/s10346-018-1114-x ↗
5. Liquefaction analysis and damage evaluation of embankment-type structures10.1007/s11440-018-0631-z ↗
6. Soil liquefaction-induced uplift of underground structures: Physical and numerical modeling10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001159 ↗
7. Liquefaction within a bedding fault: Understanding the initiation and movement of the Daguangbao landslide triggered by the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake (Ms = 8.0)10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106455 ↗
8. Soil liquefaction effects in the central business district during the February 2011 Christchurch earthquake10.1785/gssrl.82.6.893 ↗
9. Liquefaction-induced damage to structures during the 2011 great east Japan earthquake10.2208/journalofjsce.1.1_181 ↗
10. Geotechnical reconnaissance of the 2016 ML6. 6 Meinong earthquake in Taiwan10.1080/13632469.2017.1297271 ↗
11. Overview of long-distance flow-slide caused by the 2018 Sulawesi earthquake, Indonesia10.1016/j.sandf.2020.03.015 ↗
12. Earthquake losses due to ground failure10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.05.006 ↗
13. Study on engineering properties of calcareous sand
14. Microscopic characterization of intra-pore structures of calcareous sands
15. Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001662 ↗
16. Effect of particle shape on the liquefaction resistance of calcareous sands10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106302 ↗
17. Effect of relative density and biocementation on cyclic response of calcareous sand10.1139/cgj-2018-0573 ↗
18. Geotechnical aspects of failures at Port-au-Prince seaport during the 12 January 2010 Haiti earthquake10.1193/1.3636440 ↗
19. Undrained cyclic and monotonic behavior of Hormuz calcareous sand using hollow cylinder simple shear tests10.1007/s40999-016-0021-6 ↗
20. Experimental study on the cyclic behavior of loose calcareous sand under linear stress paths10.1080/1064119X.2019.1567631 ↗
21. Analysis for characteristics of seismic liquefaction in engineering sites of coralline soils
22. Taylor, R.E. (1994). Geotechnical Centrifuge Technology, CRC Press.
23. Centrifuge and numerical modelling of earthquake-induced soil liquefaction under free-field conditions and by considering soil–structure interaction10.1007/s10518-020-00972-3 ↗
24. Project VELACS—Control test results10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1993)119:8(1276) ↗
25. Centrifuge modeling of earthquake-induced lateral spreading in sand10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:12(1195) ↗
26. Comparison between VELACS numerical ‘class A’ predictions and centrifuge experimental soil test results10.1016/0267-7261(94)00038-I ↗
27. Analysis of site liquefaction and lateral spreading using centrifuge testing records10.3208/sandf.36.2_111 ↗
28. Kutter, B., Manzari, M., and Zeghal, M. (2020). LEAP-2017: Comparison of the Type-B numerical simulations with centrifuge test results. Model Tests and Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction and Lateral Spreading, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-22818-7 ↗
29. Kutter, B., Manzari, M., and Zeghal, M. (2019). LEAP-UCD 2017 version 1.01 model specifications. Model Tests and Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction and Lateral Spreading: LEAP-UCD-2017, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-22818-7_1 ↗
30. Qiu, Z., and Elgamal, A. (2020). Numerical simulations of LEAP dynamic centrifuge model tests for response of liquefiable sloping ground. Model Tests and Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction and Lateral Spreading, Springer.10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106378 ↗
31. Lai, C.G., Bozzoni, F., Meisina, C., Poggi, V., Zuccolo, E., Bonì, R., Conca, D., Famà, A., and Cosentini, R. (2019). Mapping the liquefaction hazard at different geographical scales. Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering for Protection and Development of Environment and Constructions, CRC Press.
32. Meisina, C., Bonì, R., Bordoni, M., Lai, C.G., Famà, A., Bozzoni, F., Cosentini, R.M., Castaldini, D., Fontana, D., and Lugli, S. (2019). 3D Geological model reconstruction for liquefaction hazard assessment in the Po Plain. Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering for Protection and Development of Environment and Constructions, CRC Press.
33. Evaluating 2D numerical simulations of granular columns in level and gently sloping liquefiable sites using centrifuge experiments10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.03.023 ↗
34. Numerical simulation of centrifuge experiments on liquefaction mitigation of silty soils using stone columns10.1007/s12205-015-0363-7 ↗
35. Generalised scaling relations for dynamic centrifuge tests10.1680/geot.2005.55.5.355 ↗
36. Iai, S., and Sugano, T. (1999). Soil-structure interaction studies through shaking table tests. Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, A.A. Balkema, Brookfield.
37. Application of the generalised scaling law to saturated ground
38. Centrifuge model tests at Zhejiang University for LEAP-Asia-2019 and validation of the generalized scaling law10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106660 ↗
39. Advances in earthquake-induced liquefaction
40. Yang, Z. (2000). Numerical Modeling of Earthquake Site Response Including Dilation and Liquefaction. [Ph.D. Thesis, Columbia University].
41. Computational model for cyclic mobility and associated shear deformation10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:12(1119) ↗
42. Mitigation of liquefaction-induced lateral deformation in a sloping stratum: Three-dimensional numerical simulation10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000137 ↗
43. Numerical simulation of improvement of a liquefiable soil layer using stone column and pile-pinning techniques10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.04.006 ↗
44. Dense granular columns in liquefiable ground. I: Shear reinforcement and cyclic stress ratio reduction10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001474 ↗
45. Dense granular columns in liquefiable ground. II: Effects on deformations10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001475 ↗
46. A simple plasticity theory for frictional cohesionless soils
47. Gingery, J.R., Elgamal, A., and Bray, J.D. (2015, January 1–4). Liquefaction model calibration: Element-level versus 1-D site response. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Christchurch, New Zealand.
48. Yang, Z., Lu, J., and Elgamal, A. (2021, July 01). OpenSees Soil Models and Solid-Fluid Fully Coupled Elements: User’s Manual. Available online: http://www.soilquake.net/opensees/OSManual_UCSD_soil_models_2008.pdf.