Enhanced CDM model accounting of stress triaxiality and Lode angle for ductile damage prediction in metal forming
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper deals with the prediction of ductile damage based on CDM approach fully coupled with advanced elastoplastic constitutive equations. This fully coupled damage model is developed based on the total energy equivalence assumption under the thermodynamics of irreversible processes framework with state variables. In this model, the damage evolution is enhanced by accounting for both stress triaxiality and Lode angle. The proposed constitutive equations are implemented into Finite Element (FE) code ABAQUS/Explicit through a user material subroutine (VUMAT). The material parameters are determined by the hybrid experimental-numerical method using various tensile and shear tests. Validation of the proposed model has been done using different tests of two aluminum alloys (Al6061-T6 and Al6014-T4). Through comparisons of numerical simulations with experimental results for different loading paths, the predictive capabilities of the proposed model have been shown. The model is found to be able to capture the initiation as well as propagation of macro-crack in sheet and bulk metals during their forming processes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Numerical methods in engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Engineering Mechanics, College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, China
ICD/LASMIS, University of Technology of Troyes, Troyes, France
Léonard de Vinci Pôle Universitaire, Research Center, Paris La Défense Cedex, France
Funding
Qingdao Postdoctoral Applied Research Program · European Funds and the Alsace-Champagne-Ardenne-Loraine Region · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/105678951663572910.1177/1056789516635729 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.01.00810.1016/j.ijplas.2010.01.008 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2007.09.00410.1016/j.ijplas.2007.09.004 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.02.00610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.02.006 ↗
5. 10.1177/105678950910348210.1177/1056789509103482 ↗
6. 10.1007/s12289-010-0996-510.1007/s12289-010-0996-5 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.03.02110.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.03.021 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.08.01110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.08.011 ↗
9. 10.1177/10567895920010020110.1177/105678959200100201 ↗
10. 10.1177/105678951668465010.1177/1056789516684650 ↗
11. 10.1177/105678951877213010.1177/1056789518772130 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cma.2019.03.05110.1016/j.cma.2019.03.051 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.proeng.2010.03.11410.1016/j.proeng.2010.03.114 ↗
14. 10.1115/1.316718410.1115/1.3167184 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.08.00410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.08.004 ↗
16. 10.1115/1.344340110.1115/1.3443401 ↗
17. 10.1177/105678951877517910.1177/1056789518775179 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.crme.2018.05.00310.1016/j.crme.2018.05.003 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.cirpj.2012.07.00310.1016/j.cirpj.2012.07.003 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2015.12.00910.1016/j.euromechsol.2015.12.009 ↗
21. Kachanov LM · Nank SSR Otd Tech Nauk · 1958 · 8 · 26
22. 10.1115/1.322577510.1115/1.3225775 ↗
23. Lemaitre J · 1994
24. Lemaitre J, Chaboche JL, Benallal A, et al. (2009) Mécanique des matériaux solides. Paris: Dunod.
25. Lemaitre J · 2005
26. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.04.00110.1016/j.ijplas.2010.04.001 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2018.01.00310.1016/j.ijplas.2018.01.003 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.06.29710.1016/j.mspro.2014.06.297 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.03.00110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.03.001 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.02.01610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.02.016 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2017.04.00810.1016/j.ijplas.2017.04.008 ↗
32. 10.1016/0013-7944(85)90093-110.1016/0013-7944(85)90093-1 ↗
33. Mazars J · Fracture Toughness Fracture Energy of Concrete · 1986 · 1 · 61
34. 10.1016/0022-5096(84)90031-010.1016/0022-5096(84)90031-0 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.09.00810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.09.008 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.10529710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105297 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2015.08.00410.1016/j.ijplas.2015.08.004 ↗
38. 10.1016/0029-5493(87)90234-210.1016/0029-5493(87)90234-2 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.02.02310.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.02.023 ↗
40. 10.1002/978111856219210.1002/9781118562192 ↗
41. 10.1016/B0-08-043749-4/03072-X10.1016/B0-08-043749-4/03072-X ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.06.03010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.06.030 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.10.01410.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.10.014 ↗
44. 10.1007/BF0003619110.1007/BF00036191 ↗
45. 10.1177/105678951880603910.1177/1056789518806039 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.08.01210.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.08.012 ↗
47. 10.1177/105678951774442510.1177/1056789517744425 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.01.02910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.01.029 ↗
49. 10.1177/105678951454657810.1177/1056789514546578 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2018.08.00210.1016/j.euromechsol.2018.08.002 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.11646210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116462 ↗
52. 10.1177/105678951986577110.1177/1056789519865771 ↗