journal article·2026-05-26

A two-step damage model for analysis of recycled aggregate concrete beam on foundation: Displacement-based approach

Worathep Sae-Long, Suchart Limkatanyu, Piti Sukontasukkul, Tanakorn Phoo-ngernkham, Suraparb Keawsawasvong, Chanachai Thongchom, Nattapong Damrongwiriyanupap, Rut Su, Amorn Pimanmas

Publisher page

Abstract

This study presents a damage-inclusive analytical framework for the static bending analysis of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) beams resting on elastic foundations. The principal contribution is not the rederivation of the previously published two-step RAC constitutive model itself, but its integration into new displacement-based beam-foundation formulations that enable a structural-level assessment of damage-informed stiffness degradation under different foundation idealizations. Three RAC homogenization schemes, namely the Voigt (parallel), Reuss (series), and generalized self-consistent models, are combined with Kerr-type, Winkler–Pasternak, and Winkler foundations within the Euler–Bernoulli beam framework. The governing differential equations, boundary conditions, and closed-form analytical solutions are derived assuming small deformations and linear, homogeneous, isotropic effective behavior. Parametric studies are then conducted to evaluate the effects of constituent volume fractions, foundation parameters, and foundation model type on beam deflection. The results show that increasing the recycled concrete aggregate content increases beam deflection, whereas increasing the natural coarse aggregate and cement paste contents reduces it. Increasing the shear-layer stiffness and subgrade stiffness decreases beam deflection, while the generalized self-consistent model consistently predicts responses between the Voigt and Reuss bounds. For the parameter range considered, the Kerr-type foundation yields the largest deflections among the three foundation idealizations. The proposed framework provides a useful analytical benchmark for serviceability-oriented assessment and preliminary design of RAC members supported by deformable media, such as ground beams, strip/slab-on-ground elements, sleepers, and pavement-related substructures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of Phayao

Prince of Songkla University

King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok

Rajamangala University of Technology Isan

Thammasat University

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Mongkut’s University of Technology, North Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand

Kasetsart University

Funding

National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) and KMUTNB under the Senior Research Scholar program · University of Phayao and Thailand Science Research and Innovation Fund

References (88)

Show source-provided references
1. Ahamed M, Mondal C, Ahmed TU (2023) Experimental investigation of beams on elastic foundation subjected to static concentrated load. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Planning, Architecture & Civil Engineering. Rajshahi, Bangladesh: Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology.
2. 10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00179-X10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00179-X ↗
3. 10.3390/recycling1005019310.3390/recycling10050193 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.03.03310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.03.033 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.10831810.1016/j.rineng.2025.108318 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.00310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.003 ↗
7. 10.1080/15397734.2025.253467910.1080/15397734.2025.2534679 ↗
8. 10.1142/S021945542550236010.1142/S0219455425502360 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13849910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138499 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.05.00910.1016/j.compstruc.2016.05.009 ↗
11. 10.1007/s00707-023-03848-010.1007/s00707-023-03848-0 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.06310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.063 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.02.00210.1016/j.cemconres.2007.02.002 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.12.00410.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.12.004 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.09.00510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.09.005 ↗
16. Fathifazl G, Razaqpur AG, Isgor OB, et al. (2009) Flexural performance of steel-reinforced recycled concrete beams. ACI Structural Journal 106(6): 858–867.
17. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2024.10545210.1016/j.cemconcomp.2024.105452 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.11751910.1016/j.engstruct.2024.117519 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.12.01810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.12.018 ↗
20. 10.12989/sem.1999.7.3.25910.12989/sem.1999.7.3.259 ↗
21. 10.3390/infrastructures1012032110.3390/infrastructures10120321 ↗
22. Himeur N, Mamen B, Benguediab S (2022) Coupled effect of variable Winkler–Pasternak foundations on bending behavior of FG plates exposed to several types of loading. Steel and Composite Structures 44(3): 353–369.
23. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.11812310.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118123 ↗
24. Hu X, Lu Q, Cheng S (2019) Uniaxial damaged plastic constitutive relation of recycled aggregate concrete. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering: 2982195.
25. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13498310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.134983 ↗
26. 10.3390/ma1307155110.3390/ma13071551 ↗
27. 10.1007/s00707-024-03952-910.1007/s00707-024-03952-9 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e0563010.1016/j.cscm.2025.e05630 ↗
29. 10.1115/1.312281010.1115/1.3122810 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2024.10492110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2024.104921 ↗
31. 10.1038/s42254-021-00314-510.1038/s42254-021-00314-5 ↗
32. 10.1007/BF0117430810.1007/BF01174308 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.06.00510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.06.005 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.10069610.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100696 ↗
35. 10.1177/1461348425133990910.1177/14613484251339909 ↗
36. 10.1680/jmacr.17.0004210.1680/jmacr.17.00042 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11754310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117543 ↗
38. 10.1007/s12205-013-1606-010.1007/s12205-013-1606-0 ↗
39. Limkatanyu S, Prachasaree W, Damrongwiriyanupap N, et al. (2013b) Exact stiffness for beams on Kerr-type foundation: The virtual force approach. Journal of Applied Mathematics 2013: 626287.
40. Limkatanyu S, Sae-Long W, Damrongwiriyanupap N, et al. (2022) Shear-flexure interaction frame model on Kerr-type foundation for analysis of non-ductile RC members on foundation. Journal of Applied and Computational Mechanics 8(3): 1076–1090.
41. Limkatanyu S, Sae-Long W, Damrongwiriyanupap N, et al. (2025) Composite damage modeling of recycled aggregate concrete beam on Winkler-Pasternak foundations: A multiphase mechanical approach. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 96(2): 139–153.
42. 10.1177/1056789525138024410.1177/10567895251380244 ↗
43. 10.1080/19648189.2014.96584710.1080/19648189.2014.965847 ↗
44. 10.1002/zamm.20170031110.1002/zamm.201700311 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.06.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2009.06.004 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13929910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139299 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.11782210.1016/j.engstruct.2024.117822 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2009.11.00610.1016/j.compgeo.2009.11.006 ↗
49. 10.1186/s40069-024-00733-510.1186/s40069-024-00733-5 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.rcradv.2024.20024110.1016/j.rcradv.2024.200241 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12095010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120950 ↗
52. Pasternak PL (1954) On a New Method of Analysis of an Elastic Foundation by Means of Two Foundation Constants. Moscow, USSR: Gosuderevstvennae Izdatlesva Literaturi po Stroitelstvu i Arkihitekture. (in Russian).
53. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.03010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.030 ↗
54. 10.3390/resources1402002110.3390/resources14020021 ↗
55. 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-1858810.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-18588 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12635710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126357 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e0371610.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03716 ↗
58. 10.1080/21650373.2025.258042710.1080/21650373.2025.2580427 ↗
59. 10.1177/1056789524130322110.1177/10567895241303221 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.14236510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.142365 ↗
61. Sae-Long W, Limkatanyu S, Damrongwiriyanupap N, et al. (2023) Nonlinear shear-flexure-interaction RC frame element on Winkler-Pasternak foundation. Geomechanics and Engineering 32(1): 69–84.
62. Sae-Long W, Limkatanyu S, Hansapinyo C, et al. (2021c) Nonlinear flexibility-based beam element on Winkler-Pasternak foundation. Geomechanics and Engineering 24(4): 371–388.
63. Sae-Long W, Limkatanyu S, Panedpojaman P, et al. (2021a) Nonlinear Winkler-based frame element with inclusion of shear-flexure interaction effect for analysis of non-ductile RC members on foundation. Journal of Applied and Computational Mechanics 7(1): 148–164.
64. 10.1155/2020/827674510.1155/2020/8276745 ↗
65. 10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00992-710.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00992-7 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.09.01210.1016/j.engstruct.2012.09.012 ↗
67. 10.1063/5.004101610.1063/5.0041016 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.11710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.117 ↗
69. Sobuz HR, Datta SD, Akid ASM, et al. (2024) Evaluating the effects of recycled concrete aggregate size and concentration on properties of high-strength sustainable concrete. Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences 36(3): 216–227.
70. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.06.00710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.06.007 ↗
71. 10.1142/S021945542650078110.1142/S0219455426500781 ↗
72. 10.1007/s00366-025-02106-210.1007/s00366-025-02106-2 ↗
73. 10.1002/pse.20210.1002/pse.202 ↗
74. Winkler E (1867) Die Lehre von der und Festigkeit. Prague, Czechoslovakia: Dominicus.
75. Wolfram S (1992) Mathematica Reference Guide. Redwood City, California, USA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
76. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2006)132:11(1195)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2006)132:11(1195) ↗
77. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.05.00410.1016/j.cemconres.2013.05.004 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.01.00610.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.01.006 ↗
79. 10.1038/s44359-025-00125-210.1038/s44359-025-00125-2 ↗
80. 10.3390/app1406227710.3390/app14062277 ↗
81. 10.1016/0045-7949(89)90232-010.1016/0045-7949(89)90232-0 ↗
82. Youzera H, Meftah SA, Tounsi A, et al. (2025) Finite element formulation for free vibration analysis of porous FGM beams under thermal excitation. Computers and Concrete 36(4): 419–430.
83. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.14262510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.142625 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.15919710.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159197 ↗
85. Zhang L, Wu GT, Wu J (2019) A Kerr-type elastic foundation model for the buckling analysis of a beam bonded on an elastic layer. ZAMM - Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics / Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik 99(10): e201900162.
86. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.04.00210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.04.002 ↗
87. 10.1142/S021945542571004X10.1142/S021945542571004X ↗
88. 10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-889110.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-8891 ↗