journal article·2026-04-21Open access

Experimental and Numerical Retrofitting of Confined Masonry Buildings with GFRP Under Lateral Cyclic Loading

Tarik S. Elsalakawy, Ahmed M. Hafez, Mosaad H. EL-Diasity

Abstract

Abstract This paper studies the structural performance of a retrofitted 3D confined masonry building. A non-retrofitted building was subjected to lateral cyclic loading until the first crack appeared in walls then retrofitted using woven textile glass fiber (GFRP), and the loading restarted until failure. Clay masonry walls, tie beams, tie columns, and R.C. slabs were used for construction then tested under lateral reversed cyclic loading. To study the effect of perforation on the structural performance of the building, the walls were constructed with different perforations, two solid walls, a wall with a door, and a wall with a window. This retrofitting technique was applied on the cracked specimen and then reloaded again under cyclic lateral loading. Results of a control non-retrofitted building with the same dimensions and perforations are used to be compared with our results, lateral resistance of the retrofitted specimen was increased by (26–32%) relative to the un-retrofitted reference specimen [4], as the maximum lateral load at the top of the building were + 217 and -195 kN for both push and pull cases, respectively, while the maximum lateral load of the un-retrofitted reference specimen [4] were + 165 and -155 kN for both push and pull cases, respectively, the maximum lateral displacement at failure was reduced by (23–31%). The total cumulative dissipated energy of the retrofitted specimen was improved by 60%, as the dissipated energy of the retrofitted specimen was 29.88 kN·m at max displacement of 44 mm while the dissipated energy of the un-retrofitted reference specimen [4] was 14.2 kN·m, ductility was improved by 60% while hysteresis damping of the building was improved by 78% compared to the un-retrofitted reference specimen. Diagonal shear failure was prevented and changed to sliding failure and the final collapse of the building was greatly delayed. A nonlinear finite element analysis is performed to verify experimental results and to predict results that are difficult to accomplish through this experiment. Good agreement is found between experimental and numerical results in terms of deformed shapes, shear failure, and lateral resistance. A parametric study is carried out to investigate the effect of all used parameters in the experimental test and study their effect on lateral behavior of the building.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Seismic Performance and Analysis · Hygrothermal properties of building materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Abdulahad, E., & Mahmud, E. (2020). Seismic behaviour before and after strengthening of solid confined masonry walls with glass fiber reinforced polymers-analysis of hysteresis curves, obtained by shaking table tests, in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/951/1/01201810.1088/1757-899X/951/1/012018 ↗
2. ANSYS-Release Version 15.0, A Finite Element Computer Software and User Manual for Nonlinear Structural Analysis, ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, PA, 2013.
3. ASTM E519–02. (2002). Standard test method for diagonal tension (Shear) in masonry assemblages.
4. ATC-58–1, (2011), “seismic performance assessment of building,” Volume 1, prepared by ATC for FEMA.
5. Belghiat, C., Messabhia, A., Plassiard, J. P., Guenfoud, M., Plé, O., & Perrotin, P. (2018). Experimental study of double-panel confined masonry walls under lateral loading. Journal of Building Engineering, 20, 531–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.09.00110.1016/j.jobe.2018.09.001 ↗
6. Bhargavi, S., & Kumar, R. P. (2015). Comparison between the effect of lintel and lintel band on the global performance of load bearing walls and masonry infilled RC frames. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 6(2), 68–78.
7. A. Chourasia, ; S K Bhattacharyya, ; N M Bhandari, and P. Bhargava, “Seismic Performance of Different Masonry Buildings: Full-Scale Experimental Study,” 2016, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.10.1061/(ASCE)CF ↗
8. Chourasia, A., Singhal, S., & Parashar, J. (2020). Seismic performance evaluation of full-scale confined masonry building using light weight cellular panels. Journal of Building Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101473.10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101473. ↗
9. European Committee for Standardisation. (1995). EC6, design of masonry structures. Part 1–1: General rules for buildings—Rules for reinforced and un-reinforced masonry, ENV1996 1–1: Bruxels: CEN.
10. El-Diasity, M., Okail, H., Kamal, O., & Said, M. (2015). Structural performance of confined masonry walls retrofitted using ferrocement and GFRP under in-plane cyclic loading. Engineering Structures, 94, 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2015.03.03510.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2015.03.035 ↗
11. El-Hariri, M. O. R., Gamal, A. A., El-Diasity, M., & Sayed, S. H. (2022). Experimental Study of 3D Confined Masonry Building under Cyclic Loading. In Engineering Research Journal (ERJ) (Vol. 1, Issue 52).10.21608/erjsh.2022.235278 ↗
12. Garcí, A. B., et al. (2019). Diagonal compression tests on masonry wallets coated with mortars reinforced with glass fibers. Materials and Structures. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-019-1360-y10.1617/s11527-019-1360-y ↗
13. Gupta, A., & Singhal, V. (2024). Experimental Investigation of Confined Masonry Walls with Openings. Journal of Structural Engineering.10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-13305 ↗
14. Gupta, A., & Singhal, V. (2023). Strengthening of confined masonry walls using reinforced cementitious matrix subjected to in-plane loads: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 28(5), 1404–1420.10.1080/13632469.2023.2233029 ↗
15. Hose, Y., & Seible, F. (1999). Performance evaluation database for concrete bridge components, and systems under simulated seismic loads. PEER report 1999/11, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center College of Engineering, University of California, Berkley, U.S.A.
16. Ibrar, M., Naseer, A., Ashraf, M., Badshah, E., & Ullah, S. (2022). Evaluation of confined masonry walls with varying sizes of confining elements and reinforcement ratios against cyclic loading. Journal of Building Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104094.10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104094. ↗
17. Ma, S., & May, I. (1986). The Newton-Raphson method used in the non-linear analysis of concrete structures. Computers & Structures, 24(2), 177–185.10.1016/0045-7949(86)90277-4 ↗
18. A. Marinilli and E. Castilla, “3th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF CONFINED MASONRY WALLS WITH SEVERAL CONFINING-COLUMNS,” 2016,”.
19. Marques, R., & Lourenço, P. B. (2013). A model for pushover analysis of confined masonry structures: Implementation and validation. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 11(6), 2133–2150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9497-510.1007/s10518-013-9497-5 ↗
20. D. Quiun and D. Torrealva, “Seismic behaviour of a three-story half scale confined masonry structure confined masonry in peru view project reinforced adobe in Peru and Andean countries View project,” 1992, https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2447.3926.10.13140/2.1.2447.3926 ↗
21. RILEM TC: 76-LUM. (1994). Diagonal tensile strength tests of small wall specimens. In RILEM (International Union of Laboratories and Experts in Construction Materials), Recommendations for the testing and use of constructions materials, London: E&FN SPON, p. 488–89.
22. Thamboo, J., Navaratnam, S., Poologanathan, K., & Corradi, M. (2021). Characteristics of CFRP strengthened masonry wallettes under concentric and eccentric compression. Case Studies in Construction Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00472.10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00472. ↗
23. W. Wijaya, D. Kusumastuti, M. Suarjana, Rildova, and K. Pribadi, “Experimental study on wall-frame connection of confined masonry wall,” in Procedia Engineering, 2011, pp. 2094–2102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.263.10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.263 ↗
24. Willam, K. J., & Warnke, E. P. (1975). Constitutive models for the triaxial behavior of concrete. IABSE Proceedings, 19, 1–30.