journal article·2026-03-25Open access

Rational Estimation of Initial State of Post-tensioned Concrete Beams Using Field Measurement Data

Hyun Woo Park, Dongmin Lee, Jin Ho Hwang, Seong-Cheol Lee

Abstract

Abstract Accurate estimation of initial prestress is essential for ensuring the structural integrity, durability, and quality management of prestressed concrete (PSC) girders. However, conventional estimation methods that rely on design provisions or experimental data often fail to reflect real field conditions due to variations in material properties, construction methods, and environmental factors. This study presents a novel and rational method that performs the initial calibration of PSC-I girders during prestressing using on-site measurement data. By analyzing tendon elongation and camber measured during prestressing, the proposed method estimates the wobble and curvature friction coefficients and the concrete elastic modulus, thereby improving the accuracy of evaluating initial prestress and deformation behavior. The analytical formulation incorporates equilibrium equations that account for self-weight, prestressing forces, and prestress losses due to friction, anchorage slip, and elastic shortening of concrete. Validation using field data from multiple PSC girders demonstrated strong agreement between analytical predictions and measurements, confirming the reliability of the proposed method. The novelty of this study lies in integrating field-based calibration into the prestress estimation process bridging the gap between design assumptions and actual construction performance. The proposed approach enables quality and performance management of PSC girders through statistical analysis of initial prestressing data, provides reliable initial conditions for time-dependent analysis, and improves the accuracy of long-term prestress loss prediction, contributing to safer and more efficient PSC bridge construction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete Properties and Behavior · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials). (2017). AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (8th ed.). AASHTO.
2. AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials). (2020). AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (9th ed.). AASHTO.
3. ACI (American Concrete Institute). (2008). Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-08). Farmington Hills, MI
4. ACI (American Concrete Institute). (2019). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318–19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19). Farmington Hills, MI.
5. Aïtcin, P. C., & Mehta, P. K. (1990). Effect of coarse aggregate characteristics on mechanical properties of high-strength concrete. Materials Journal, 87(2), 103–107. https://doi.org/10.14359/188210.14359/1882 ↗
6. Almohammedi, A., Dang, C. N., Murray, C. D., & Hale, W. M. (2022). Enhanced camber and deflection estimation for AASHTO prestressed concrete girders. PCI Journal, 67(6), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij67.6-0110.15554/pcij67.6-01 ↗
7. Bažant, Z. P., & Kwang-Liang-Liu. (1985). Random creep and shrinkage in structures: sampling. Journal of Structural Engineering, 111(5), 1113–1134. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:5(1113)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:5(1113) ↗
8. Bažant, Z. P., Yu, Q., & Li, G.-H. (2012). Excessive long-time deflections of prestressed box girders. I: Record-span bridge in Palau and other paradigms. Journal of Structural Engineering, 138(6), 676–686. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000048710.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000487 ↗
9. Bonopera, M., & Chang, K.-C. (2021). Novel method for identifying residual prestress force in simply supported concrete girder-bridges. Advances in Structural Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433221102206710.1177/13694332211022067 ↗
10. Bonopera, M., Liao, W.-C., & Perceka, W. (2022). Experimental-theoretical investigation of the short-term vibration response of uncracked prestressed concrete members under long-age conditions. Structures, 35, 260–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.10.09310.1016/j.istruc.2021.10.093 ↗
11. Capellan, G., & Sacristán, M. (2014). Chilina Bridge over the Chili River in Arequipa. Balanced cantilever segmental bridge in high seismicity area. IABSE Symposium Report, 102(16), 2110–2117. https://doi.org/10.2749/22213781481406864310.2749/222137814814068643 ↗
12. CEN (European Committee for Standardization). (2004). Design of concrete structures (Eurocode 2). Brussels, Belgium
13. Chen, Z., & Zhang, S. (2018). EM‐Based monitoring and probabilistic analysis of prestress loss of bonded tendons in PSC beams. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2018(1), 4064362. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/406436210.1155/2018/4064362 ↗
14. Chira, A., Puskás, A., & Bompa, D. V. (2023). Load-deformation response of long span prestressed concrete wide beams. Journal of Building Engineering, 65, 105631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.10563110.1016/j.jobe.2022.105631 ↗
15. Cho, K., Cho, J.-R., Kim, S. T., Park, S. Y., Kim, Y.-J., & Park, Y.-H. (2016). Estimation of prestress force distribution in multi-strand system of prestressed concrete structures using field data measured by electromagnetic sensor. Sensors, 16(8), 1317. https://doi.org/10.3390/s1608131710.3390/s16081317 ↗
16. CSA (Canadian Standards Association). (2006). Canadian highways bridge design code. (S6:06), Code and Commentary. Mississauga, Ontario. Canada
17. CSA (Canadian Standards Association). (2019b). Canadian highway bridge design code. (S6:19). Rexdale, Ontario, Canada
18. CSA (Canadian Standards Association). (2019a). Design of concrete structures (A23.3:19). Rexdale, Ontario, Canada
19. Dolinajová, K., & Moravčík, M. (2013). Monitoring and numerical analysis of construction stages on the bridge realized by the free cantilever method. Procedia Engineering, 65, 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.09.04910.1016/j.proeng.2013.09.049 ↗
20. Elawadi, A., Orton, S. L., Gopalaratnam, V., Holt, J., & Lopez, M. D. (2022). Accuracy evaluation of prestressed concrete girder camber in Missouri bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 27(12), 04022119. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000196610.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001966 ↗
21. fib (The International Federation for Structural Concrete). (2023). fib Model Code for Concrete Structures 2020. John Wiley & Sons.
22. Garber, D. B., Gallardo, J. M., Deschenes, D. J., & Bayrak, O. (2015). Experimental investigation of prestress losses in full-scale bridge girders. ACI Structural Journal, 112(5), 553–564. https://doi.org/10.14359/5168790910.14359/51687909 ↗
23. Huang, H., Huang, S.-S., & Pilakoutas, K. (2018). Modeling for assessment of long-term behavior of prestressed concrete box-girder bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000121010.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001210 ↗
24. Jayaseelan, H., & Russell, B. W. (2019). Reducing cambers and prestress losses by including fully tensioned top prestressing strands and mild reinforcing steel. PCI Journal, 64(3), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij64.3-0510.15554/pcij64.3-05 ↗
25. Jeon, S.-J., Park, S. Y., Kim, S.-H., Kim, S. T., & Park, Y. (2015). Estimation of friction coefficient using smart strand. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 9(3), 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-015-0112-910.1007/s40069-015-0112-9 ↗
26. Kim, J., Kim, J.-W., Lee, C., & Park, S. (2017). Development of embedded EM sensors for estimating tensile forces of PSC girder bridges. Sensors, 17(9), 1989. https://doi.org/10.3390/s1709198910.3390/s17091989 ↗
27. Kim, S.-H., Park, S. Y., & Jeon, S.-J. (2020). Long-term characteristics of prestressing force in post-tensioned structures measured using Smart Strands. Applied Sciences, 10(12), 4084. https://doi.org/10.3390/app1012408410.3390/app10124084 ↗
28. Kim, S.-H., Park, S. Y., Kim, S. T., & Jeon, S.-J. (2022a). Analysis of short-term prestress losses in post-tensioned structures using Smart Strands. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 16(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-021-00488-310.1186/s40069-021-00488-3 ↗
29. Kim, W.-K., Kim, J., Park, J., Kim, J.-W., & Park, S. (2022b). Verification of tensile force estimation method for temporary steel rods of FCM bridges based on area of magnetic hysteresis curve using embedded elasto-magnetic sensor. Sensors, 22(3), 1005. https://doi.org/10.3390/s2203100510.3390/s22031005 ↗
30. Korea Concrete Institute (KCI). (2021). Principles of Concrete Structure Analysis and Design (KDS 14 20 10). Korea Design Standard (KDS), Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea (in Korean).
31. Korea Concrete Institute (KCI). (2022a). Design code for prestressed concrete structures (Korean Design Standard KDS 14 20 60). Seoul, Republic of Korea. (In Korean)
32. Korea Concrete Institute (KCI). (2022b). Prestressed concrete (Korean Construction Specification KCS 14 20 53). Seoul, Republic of Korea. (In Korean)
33. Lee, J.-H. (2015). Prestressed concrete: Ultimate strength design & limit state design. Dong Myeong Publishers.
34. Lee, S.-C., Shin, K.-J., Kim, J.-M., & Lee, H. W. (2017). Damage detection with FBG sensors for pre-stress concrete girders. Key Engineering Materials, 737, 454–458. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.737.45410.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.737.454 ↗
35. Li, L., Shi, P., Zhou, J., Shi, Y., Guo, H., Zhang, Y., & Li, S. (2024). Dynamic performance of a 5-story full-scale prestressed precast space frame structure under edge and corner column failure scenarios. Journal of Building Engineering, 98, 111052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.11105210.1016/j.jobe.2024.111052 ↗
36. Liu, Y., Wang, J. F., Chen, C. L., & Xu, L. H. (2025). Experimental study on early age behavior of PSC beams under steam curing. Structures, 71, 108003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.10800310.1016/j.istruc.2024.108003 ↗
37. Martin, L. D. (1977). A rational method for estimating camber and deflection of precast prestressed members. PCI Journal. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij22.1-0410.15554/pcij22.1-04 ↗
38. MathWorks. (2023). MATLAB. The MathWorks Inc.
39. Noguchi, T., Tomosawa, F., Nemati, K. M., Chiaia, B. M., & Fantilli, A. P. (2009). A practical equation for elastic modulus of concrete. ACI Structural Journal, 106(5), 690. https://doi.org/10.14359/5166310910.14359/51663109 ↗
40. Ozcelik, M., & Tutus, O. (2020). An investigation on Botan Bridge (Siirt–Turkey) collapse during construction. Structures, 25, 268–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.03.01710.1016/j.istruc.2020.03.017 ↗
41. Park, J., Kim, W.-K., Jeon, K.-Y., & Park, S. (2023). Elastomagnetic sensor‐based long‐term tension monitoring of prestressed bridge member with temperature compensation. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2023(1), 5316136. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/531613610.1155/2023/5316136 ↗
42. PCI Bridge Design Manual Steering Committee. (2011). PCI bridge design manual. MNL-133 (3rd ed.). PCI.
43. PTI (Post-Tensioning Institute). (2006) Post-tensioning manual (6th edition). Arizona, US
44. PTI/ASBI 50. (2012). Guide Specification for Grouted Post-Tensioning (PTI/ASBI M50.3-12), Farmington Hills, MI
45. Shin, K.-J., Lee, S.-C., Kim, Y. Y., Kim, J.-M., Park, S., & Lee, H. (2017). Construction condition and damage monitoring of post-tensioned PSC girders using embedded sensors. Sensors, 17(8), 1843. https://doi.org/10.3390/s1708184310.3390/s17081843 ↗
46. Shin, K.-J., Park, Y.-U., Lee, S.-C., Kim, Y. Y., & Lee, H.-W. (2015). Experimental evaluation of prestress force in tendons for prestressed concrete girders using sensors. Journal of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea, 28(6), 715–722. https://doi.org/10.7734/COSEIK.2015.28.6.71510.7734/COSEIK.2015.28.6.715 ↗
47. Tadros, M. K., Fawzy, F., & Hanna, K. E. (2011). Precast, prestressed girder camber variability. PCI Journal. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.01012011.135.15410.15554/pcij.01012011.135.154 ↗
48. Yoon, Y.-S., Lee, S.-K., Lee, M.-S., Kim, J.-K., & Kwon, K.-Y. (2011). Rheological concrete creep prediction model for prestressed concrete bridges constructed by the free cantilever method. Magazine of Concrete Research, 63(9), 645–653. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.2011.63.9.64510.1680/macr.2011.63.9.645 ↗
49. Zhang, R., Duan, Y., Xing, L., Zhao, Y., Wei, W., & Hu, X. (2023). Elasto-magneto-electric (EME) sensors for force monitoring of prestressing tendons. Advances in Bridge Engineering, 4(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43251-023-00086-110.1186/s43251-023-00086-1 ↗