Phenomenological Model to Re-proportion the Ambient Cured Geopolymer Compressed Blocks
Source abstract
Abstract
Geopolymer mortar compressed blocks were prepared using fly ash, ground granulated blast furnace slag, silica fume and metakaolin as binders and sand/quarry dust/pond ash as fine aggregate. Alkaline solution was used to activate the source materials for synthesizing the geopolymer mortar. Fresh mortar was used to obtain the compressed blocks. The strength development with reference to different parameters was studied. The different parameters considered were fineness of fly ash, binder components, type of fine aggregate, molarity of alkaline solution, age of specimen, fluid-to-binder ratio, binder-to-aggregate ratio, degree of saturation, etc. The compressed blocks were tested for compression at different ages. It was observed that some of the blocks attained considerable strength within 24 h under ambient conditions. The cardinal aim was to analyze the experimental data generated to formulate a phenomenological model to arrive at the combinations of the ingredients to produce geopolymer blocks to meet the strength development desired at the specified age. The strength data was analyzed within the framework of generalized Abrams’ law. It was interesting to note that the law was applicable to the analysis of strength development of partially saturated compressed blocks when the degree of saturation was maintained constant. The validity of phenomenological model was examined with an independent set of experimental data. The blocks can replace the traditional masonry blocks with many advantages.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Building materials and conservation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Abrams, D. (1918). Design of concrete mixtures (p. 20). Chicago: Bulletin No. 1, Structural Materials Research Laboratory, Lewis Institute.
2. Bakharev, T. (2005a). Resistance of geopolymer materials to acid attack. Cement and Concrete Research,35, 658–670.10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.005 ↗
3. Bakharev, T. (2005b). Durability of geopolymer materials in sodium and magnesium sulfate solutions. Cement and Concrete Research,35, 1233–1246.10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.09.002 ↗
4. Bolomey, J. (1927). Durecissenment des mortiers ets benton. Tech Suisse Romande,16, 22–24.
5. Davidovits, J. (1988). Geopolymer’88. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference (p. 25).
6. Davidovits, J. (1994). Properties of Geopolymer Cements. In Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Alkaline Cements and Concretes (pp. 131–149). Kiev, Ukraine: SRIBM, Kiev State Technical University.
7. Davidovits, J. (1999). Chemistry of geopolymeric systems, terminology. Geopolymer International Conference, France.
8. Li, Z., Ding, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2002). Development of sustainable cementitious materials. In Proceedings of International Workshop on Sustainable Development and Concrete Technology (pp. 55–76).
9. Nagaraj, T. S., & Banu, Z. (1996). Generalization of Abrams’ law. Cement and Concrete Research,26(6), 933–942.10.1016/0008-8846(96)00065-8 ↗
10. Nagendra Prasad, K., Narasimhulu, M. L., Nagaraj, T. S., Naidu, J. M., & Syed Ifthakaruddin, (2005). Strength development in compressed cement blocks—Analysis and assessment. Indian Concrete Institute Journal,79(4), 49–54.
11. Radhakrishna, Shashishankar, A., & Nagaraj, T. S. (2006). Phenomenological Model for assessment of strength development in class F—Fly ash based geopolymer mortar. Indian Concrete Institute Journal,1, 23–27.
12. Radhakrishna, Shashishankar, A., & Udayashankar, B. C. (2008a). Analysis and assessment of strength development in class F fly ash based compressed geopolymer blocks. The Indian Concrete Journal,82(8), 31–37.
13. Radhakrishna, Shashishankar, A., & Udayashankar, B. C. (2008b). Phenomenological model to re-proportion geopolymer compressed blocks. In Proceedings of 33rd Conference on Our World in Concrete and Structures, Singapore (pp. 365–374). ISBN: 978-981-08-0412-1.
14. Radhakrishna, Shashishankar, A., Udayashankar, B. C., & Renuka Devi, M. V. (2010). Compressive strength assessment of geopolymer composites by a phenomenological model. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites,29(6), 840–853.10.1177/0731684408100703 ↗
15. Shi, C., & Fernández-Jiménez, A. (2006). Stabilization/solidification of hazardous and radioactive wastes with alkali-activated cements. Journal of Hazardous Materials B,137, 1656–1663.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.05.008 ↗
16. Wallah, S. E., & Rangan, B. V. (2006). “Low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete: Long-term properties”. Research Report GC 2, Faculty of Engineering, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia.