Analysis of Assembly Error Effect on Stability Accuracy of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Photoelectric Detection System
Source abstract
Abstract
A photoelectric detection system is a typical type of device widely used for detecting purposes based on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV). Stability accuracy is the key performance index. Compared to traditional analysis methods aimed at unpredictable error-causing sources, assembly errors can be easily controlled during the manufacturing processes. In this research, an analysis method of assembly error effect on stability accuracy is proposed. First, by using kinematics analysis of homogeneous coordinate transformation, stability accuracy is comprehensively modeled and simulated. Then, by analyzing the manufacturing process, assembly errors of axis perpendicularities, run-outs and gyroscopes are defined and modeled. By simulating different carrier movements, the effects caused by assembly errors under various environments are studied. Finally, error sensitivity is proposed by using standard deviation analysis. Results show that the most sensitive assembly errors are identified, and ranked in order of sensitivity as follows: x-component of pitch axis perpendicularity, y-component of the azimuth gyroscope assembly, and z-component of the pitch gyroscope assembly. In conclusion, the results can be used as standards of manufacturing process improvements, and the proposed methods can be used to provide valuable references for real application scenarios.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Control and Stabilization in Aerospace Systems · Advanced Measurement and Detection Methods · Optical Systems and Laser Technology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Intelligence and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China
Funding
Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Stabilization precision control methods of photoelectric aim-stabilized system10.1016/j.optcom.2015.04.056 ↗
2. Inertially stabilized platform for airborne remote sensing using magnetic bearings10.1109/TMECH.2015.2451137 ↗
3. A composite control method based on the adaptive RBFNN feedback control and the ESO for two-axis inertially stabilized platforms10.1016/j.isatra.2015.09.011 ↗
4. Comparison of an ANFIS and Fuzzy PID Control Model for Performance in a Two-axis Inertial Stabilized Platform
5. A Dynamic Model and Control Method for a Two-Axis Inertially Stabilized Platform10.1109/TIE.2016.2608322 ↗
6. Kwak, H.K., Choi, Y.J., Yu, K.H., Lyou, J., and Kang, M.S. (July, January 30). Dual Stage and Digital Image Based Method for Sight Stabilization. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, Cambridge, UK.
7. Video stabilisation with total warping variation model10.1049/iet-ipr.2016.0645 ↗
8. Spampinato, G., Bruna, A.R., Battiato, S., and Puglisi, G. (2018). Low cost rototranslational video stabilization algorithm. J. Electron. Imaging, 27.10.1117/1.JEI.27.5.051224 ↗
9. Mao, J., Li, S., Li, Q., and Yang, J. (2016, January 1–4). Continuous Second-Order Sliding Mode Control Based on Disturbance Observer for LOS Stabilized System. Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Variable Structure Systems (VSS), Nanjing, China.
10. Disturbance Observer-Based Control and Related Methods: An Overview10.1109/TIE.2015.2478397 ↗
11. Designing disturbance observer for non-linear systems—A Hirschorn inverse approach10.1049/iet-smt.2016.0105 ↗
12. Analysis and Evaluation of Installation Uncertainty in Rotary Pair Measurement
13. Liu, X., Zhang, X., Xu, H., and Zhen, Z. (2017). Machining Error Analysis of Freeform Surface Off-Axis Three-Mirror System Based on Optical Performance Evaluation. Acta Opt. Sin., 37.10.3788/AOS201737.0812005 ↗
14. Ren, S., and Wang, S. (2013, January 23–24). Impacts of Installation Errors on the Calibration Accuracy of Gyro Accelerometer Tested on Centrifuge. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Instrumentation & Measurement, Sensor Network and Automation (IMSNA), Toronto, ON, Canada.
15. SINS Installation Error Calibration Based on Multi-Position Combinations10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.383-390.4213 ↗
16. Spacecraft Angular Acceleration Estimation Using Single-Gimbal Magnetically Suspended Control Moment Gyros10.1109/TIE.2018.2826468 ↗
17. Inertial sensor-based multiloop control of fast steering mirror for line of sight stabilization10.1117/1.OE.55.11.111602 ↗
18. Zhuo, J., Sun, L., Xu, A., Yu, J., and Zhao, X. (2014, January 13–14). Research on Parallelism Detection Method of Optical Axes for Airborne Photoelectric Platform of the UAV. Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Computational Intelligence & Design, Hangzhou, China.10.1109/ISCID.2014.159 ↗
19. Han, W., Deng, Q., Lin, W., Gong, X., and Ding, S. (2019). Variation propagation modeling and analysis of automotive body outer cover panels assembly systems. Assem. Autom., 39.10.1108/AA-05-2018-067 ↗
20. Using XXY Table to Construct a Verticality Calibrator and its Error Analysis10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.870.159 ↗
21. Effect of machine tool’s spindle forced vibrations on surface roughness, dimensional accuracy, and tool wear in vertical milling of AISI P2010.1007/s00170-016-9346-1 ↗
22. Yan, K., Zhao, R., Hong, T., Liu, E., and Zhuang, Z. (2018). A High Accuracy Method for Pose Estimation Based on Rotation Parameters. Measurement, 122.10.1016/j.measurement.2018.02.013 ↗
23. Ji, X. (2015). Scale Factor Modeling of Micro-Electro Mechanical Systems Gyroscope Sensor by Least Squares Support Vector Machine. Sens. Lett., 13.10.1166/sl.2015.3448 ↗
24. Guo, X., Sun, C., Peng, W., and Lu, H. (2018). A hybrid method for MEMS gyroscope signal error compensation. Sens. Rev., 38.10.1108/SR-05-2017-0084 ↗
25. Carrier movement isolation algorithm for rotary-modulation inertial navigation system
26. Numerical simulation of LNG carrier spherical tank’s wind resistance