Flexural Behavior of Curved-Bolt Jointed Tunnel Segments under Combined Axial Force and Bending Moments
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Precast segmental tunnel linings are structurally vulnerable due to the presence of mechanical joints between segments. However, the lack of detailed design guidelines for these joints has led to limited recognition of the need to evaluate their structural performance. Consequently, most previous studies have focused primarily on the behavior of single segments. Although some research has addressed jointed segments, the majority employed straight-type specimens that fail to capture the actual curvature of tunnel linings. As a result, the influence of joint and segment geometry on the structural response of tunnel linings remains insufficiently quantified, and ultimate failure modes—essential for ultimate limit state design—have not been adequately discussed. To fill this gap, this study conducted full-scale experiments on both single and jointed segments, including arch-type and straight-type geometries. The objective was to examine how segment joints and geometries affect structural responses and to identify the ultimate failure modes of jointed segments. The results revealed that jointed segments exhibited distinct behaviors compared with single segments, governed by joint rotation and local stress concentration. Their response progressed through three stages—bolt contact, joint surface contact, and concrete crushing. The ultimate failure pattern varied with moment direction, with cone-shaped failure developing under sagging, whereas only intrados crushing occurred under hogging. Axial force and geometry influenced stiffness and post-cracking performance, with arch-type segments showing stiffness recovery after cracking and demonstrating superior performance to straight-type segments. These findings contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of tunnel segment behavior.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Abbas, S., Soliman, A. M., & Nehdi, M. L. (2014). Mechanical Performance of Reinforced Concrete and Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Precast Tunnel Lining Segments: A Case Study. ACI Materials Journal, 111(5), 501–510. https://doi.org/10.14359/5168710110.14359/51687101 ↗
2. Caratelli, A., Meda, A., Rinaldi, Z., Giuliani-Leonardi, S., & Renault, F. (2018). On the behavior of radial joints in segmental tunnel linings. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 71, 180–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.08.02210.1016/j.tust.2017.08.022 ↗
3. Conforti, A., Tiberti, G., Plizzari, G. A., Caratelli, A., & Meda, A. (2017). Precast tunnel segments reinforced by macro-synthetic fibers. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 63, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.12.00510.1016/j.tust.2016.12.005 ↗
4. Conforti, A., Trabucchi, I., Tiberti, G., Plizzari, G. A., Caratelli, A., & Meda, A. (2019). Precast tunnel segments for metro tunnel lining: A hybrid reinforcement solution using macro-synthetic fibers. Engineering Structures, 199, Article 109628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.10962810.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109628 ↗
5. Ding, W., Chen, X., Jin, Y., & Qiao, Y. (2021). Flexural behavior of segmental joint containing double rows of bolts: Experiment and simulation. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 112, Article 103940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.10394010.1016/j.tust.2021.103940 ↗
6. Ding, W., Gong, Y., Qiao, Y., & Gong, C. (2020). Experimental investigation on mechanical behavior of segmental joint under combined loading of compression-bending-shear. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 98, Article 103346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.10334610.1016/j.tust.2020.103346 ↗
7. Feng, K., He, C., Qiu, Y., Zhang, L., Wang, W., Xie, H., & Cao, S. (2018). Full-scale tests on bending behavior of segmental joints for large underwater shield tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 75, 100–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.02.00810.1016/j.tust.2018.02.008 ↗
8. Hamoda, A., Basha, A., Fayed, S., & Sennah, K. (2019). Experimental and numerical assessment of reinforced concrete beams with disturbed depth. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-019-0369-510.1186/s40069-019-0369-5 ↗
9. Hosseini, S. M., Mousa, S., Mohamed, H. M., & Benmokrane, B. (2022). Structural behavior of precast reinforced concrete tunnel segments with glass fiber-reinforced polymer bars and ties under bending load. ACI Structural Journal, 119(1), 307–319. https://doi.org/10.14359/5173414310.14359/51734143 ↗
10. Jin, Y., Ding, W., Yan, Z., Soga, K., & Li, Z. (2017). Experimental investigation of the nonlinear behavior of segmental joints in a water-conveyance tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 68, 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.05.01810.1016/j.tust.2017.05.018 ↗
11. Jusoh, S. N., Mohamad, H., Marto, A., Yunus, N. M., Kasime, F., Namazi, E., & Sohaei, H. (2019). Precast Concrete Tunnel Segments: A Review on Current Research. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Mechanics, 64(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.37934/aram.64.1.71610.37934/aram.64.1.716 ↗
12. Koyama, Y. (2003). Present status and technology of shield tunneling method in Japan. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 18, 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(03)00040-310.1016/S0886-7798(03)00040-3 ↗
13. Lee, G. P., Bae, G. J., Kang, T. S., Chang, S. H., & Choi, S. W. (2014). Analysis of segment lining cracking load considering axial force by varying boundary condition. Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, 16(2), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.9711/KTAJ.2014.16.2.17310.9711/KTAJ.2014.16.2.173 ↗
14. Lee, G. P., Park, Y. T., Choi, S. W., Chang, S. H., Bae, G. J., Kang, T. S., & Lee, J. S. (2012). An experimental study on mechanical behavior of shield segment with high-strength concrete and high-tension rebar. Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, 14(3), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.9711/KTAJ.2012.14.3.21510.9711/KTAJ.2012.14.3.215 ↗
15. Lee, S. C., Cho, J. Y., & Vecchio, F. J. (2011). Model for post-yield tension stiffening and rebar rupture in concrete members. Engineering Structures, 33(5), 1723–1733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.02.00910.1016/j.engstruct.2011.02.009 ↗
16. Lee, Y. J., Kim, K. L., Jeong, K. W., Hong, E. J., Kim, S. H., & Jun, D. C. (2015). A study on the design of shield tunnel lining in high water pressure condition. The Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, 17(3), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.9711/KTAJ.2015.17.3.22710.9711/KTAJ.2015.17.3.227 ↗
17. Li, P., Jia, Z., Zhang, M., Gao, X., Wang, H., & Feng, W. (2023). Bending failure performance of a shield tunnel segment based on full-scale test and numerical analysis. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 17(7), 1033–1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-023-0973-y10.1007/s11709-023-0973-y ↗
18. Li, X., Yan, Z., Wang, Z., & Zhu, H. (2015). Experimental and analytical study on longitudinal joint opening of concrete segmental lining. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 46, 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2014.11.00210.1016/j.tust.2014.11.002 ↗
19. Liao, L. (2015). Structural design and characterisation of FRC precast segments. Doctoral dissertation, The Technical University of Catalonia, Barcelona.
20. Liu, X., Zhang, C., Zhang, C., & Yuan, Y. (2017). Ultimate load-carrying capacity of the longitudinal joints in segmental tunnel linings. Structural Concrete, 18(5), 693–709. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.20160007010.1002/suco.201600070 ↗
21. Ma, S. J., Gil, H. J., & Kim, D. M. (2013). A Study on the Improvement of Connection Method for Segment in Tunnel Lining System Using Prestressed Steel Cable by Real-scale Test. Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society, 29(6), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.7843/kgs.2013.29.6.3310.7843/kgs.2013.29.6.33 ↗
22. Meda, A., Rinaldi, Z., Spagnuolo, S., De Rivaz, B., & Giamundo, N. (2019). Hybrid precast tunnel segments in fiber reinforced concrete with glass fiber reinforced bars. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 86, 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.01.01610.1016/j.tust.2019.01.016 ↗
23. Ouyang, Z., Zheng, H., Naito, C., Quiel, S., & Mooney, M. (2024). Testing of axial-moment-rotation response for skewed flat radial joints in precast concrete segmental tunnel linings. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 150, Article 105812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2024.10581210.1016/j.tust.2024.105812 ↗
24. Petraroia, D. N., & Mark, P. (2021). Variable, full-scale tester for tunnel linings. Structural Concrete, 22(6), 3353–3367. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.20200080610.1002/suco.202000806 ↗
25. Petraroia, D. N., Plückelmann, S., Mark, P., & Breitenbücher, R. (2024). Tunnel lining segments with enhanced bearing capacity using hybrid concrete concepts. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 143, Article 105484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2023.10548410.1016/j.tust.2023.105484 ↗
26. Qiu, Y., Hu, X., Walton, G., He, C., He, C., & Ju, J. W. (2021). Full scale tests and a progressive failure model to simulate full mechanical behavior of concrete tunnel segmental lining joints. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 110, Article 103834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.10383410.1016/j.tust.2021.103834 ↗
27. Wu, Y., Ding, W., Li, S., & Qiao, Y. (2023). Effect of oblique bolt arrangement on flexural behavior of segmental joint for shield tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 135, Article 105043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2023.10504310.1016/j.tust.2023.105043 ↗
28. Yan, Z., Shen, Y., Zhu, H., & Lu, Y. (2016). Experimental study of tunnel segmental joints subjected to elevated temperature. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 53, 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.01.00510.1016/j.tust.2016.01.005 ↗
29. Yang, Y., Shao, Z., Wu, K., & Wang, Y. (2024). A plastic Stillinger-Weber potential-based discretized virtual internal bond approach for modeling soft rock fracture and its application in tunnel failure. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 301, Article 110056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.11005610.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110056 ↗
30. Yang, Y., Shao, Z., Wu, K., Zhao, N., & Wang, Y. (2025). Machine learning approaches for predicting rock mode I fracture toughness: Insights from ISRM suggested CCNBD and SCB tests. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 318, Article 110949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2025.11094910.1016/j.engfracmech.2025.110949 ↗
31. Yang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2025). Dynamic fracture simulation of flawed rocks under varying loading rates by the rate-dependent SW-DVIB model combined with EPM. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 136, Article 104857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2025.10485710.1016/j.tafmec.2025.104857 ↗
32. Zhang, J. L., Liu, X., Ren, T. Y., Yuan, Y., & Mang, H. A. (2019). Structural behavior of reinforced concrete segments of tunnel linings strengthened by a steel-concrete composite. Composites Part b, Engineering, 178, Article 107444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10744410.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107444 ↗
33. Zhang, J., & Zhao, M. (2024). Experimental study on the mechanical properties of longitudinal joints of shield tunnels under large deformation conditions. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 144, Article 105447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2023.10544710.1016/j.tust.2023.105447 ↗
34. Zhang, W., Qi, J., Zhang, G., Niu, R., Zhang, C., He, L., & Lyu, J. (2022). Full-scale experimental study on failure characteristics of the key segment in shield tunnel with super-large cross-section. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 129, Article 104671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.10467110.1016/j.tust.2022.104671 ↗