A GRASP Meta-Heuristic for Evaluating the Latency and Lifetime Impact of Critical Nodes in Large Wireless Sensor Networks
Source abstract
Abstract
Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) have lately been gaining momentum thanks to the hardware improvements and standardization software efforts. Moreover, the appearance of Internet of Things (IoT) and its reliance on sensors are helping to widely extend the usage of WSNs. However, such networks present drawbacks, mainly because of limited sensor batteries and their vulnerability against physical attacks due to the lack of protection and security. Additionally, not all the sensors inside the network have the same responsibility in terms of traffic handling. In this paper, we firstly analyze the fact that some nodes are more critical than others, considering the most critical node the one that, once incapacitated, causes the most deterioration on the network performance. Such performance is analyzed using two metrics, namely network latency and lifetime. We present a result comparison between a Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) model and a Greedy Randomized Adaptive Search Procedure (GRASP) meta-heuristic for small networks. For bigger networks, GRASP meta-heuristic results are presented to understand how the network degrades as the number of both critical and network nodes increase, by distributing them into two different areas: fixed and incremental to maintain node density.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks · Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks · Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computer Architecture, Technical University of Catalonia—BarcelonaTech (UPC), 08034 Barcelona, Spain
Department of Computer Engineering, TOBB University of Economics and Technology, 06560 Ankara, Turkey
Wireless Networks Research Lab (WINE), Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC), 08860 Castelldefels, Spain
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. Columbus, L. (2018, July 25). 10 Charts That Will Challenge Your Perspective of IoT’s Growth. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/louiscolumbus/2018/06/06/10-charts-that-will-challenge-your-perspective-of-iots-growth/.
2. Wireless Multi-Sensor Networks for Smart Cities: A Prototype System with Statistical Data Analysis10.1109/JSEN.2017.2736785 ↗
3. Idwan, S., Zubairi, J.A., and Mahmood, I. (November, January 31). Smart Solutions for Smart Cities: Using Wireless Sensor Network for Smart Dumpster Management. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS), Orlando, FL, USA.10.1109/CTS.2016.0092 ↗
4. WSN- and IOT-Based Smart Homes and Their Extension to Smart Buildings10.3390/s150510350 ↗
5. An Autonomous Wireless Body Area Network Implementation Towards IoT Connected Healthcare Applications10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2716344 ↗
6. Sembroiz, D., Careglio, D., Ricciardi, S., and Fiore, U. (2018). Planning and operational energy optimization solutions for smart buildings. Inf. Sci.10.1016/j.ins.2018.06.003 ↗
7. Yuksel, A., Uzun, E., and Tavli, B. (2015, January 13–15). The impact of elimination of the most critical node on Wireless Sensor Network lifetime. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS), Zadar, Croatia.10.1109/SAS.2015.7133609 ↗
8. Xiong, S., and Li, J. (2010, January 21–25). An Efficient Algorithm for Cut Vertex Detection in Wireless Sensor Networks. Proceedings of the IEEE 30th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS 2010), Genova, Italy.10.1109/ICDCS.2010.38 ↗
9. Design and Evaluation of Algorithms for Energy Efficient and Complete Determination of Critical Nodes for Wireless Sensor Network Reliability10.1109/TR.2018.2873917 ↗
10. Dagdeviren, O., Akram, V.K., Tavli, B., Yildiz, H.U., and Atilgan, C. (November, January 30). Distributed detection of critical nodes in wireless sensor networks using connected dominating set. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE SENSORS, Orlando, FL, USA.10.1109/ICSENS.2016.7808815 ↗
11. Kahjogh, B.O., Demirkol, I., Careglio, D., and Pascual, J.D. (2017, January 4–7). The impact of critical node elimination on the latency of wireless sensor networks. Proceedings of the 2017 Ninth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN 2017), Milan, Italy.10.1109/ICUFN.2017.7993771 ↗
12. The Impact of Incapacitation of Multiple Critical Sensor Nodes on Wireless Sensor Network Lifetime10.1109/LWC.2017.2679744 ↗
13. Impact of Limiting Hop Count on the Lifetime of Wireless Sensor Networks10.1109/LCOMM.2015.2398411 ↗
14. Performance evaluation of MAC transmission power control in wireless sensor networks10.1016/j.comnet.2006.08.001 ↗
15. A probabilistic heuristic for a computationally difficult set covering problem10.1016/0167-6377(89)90002-3 ↗