Small Dam Drainage with Nonwoven Geotextile after 40 Years of Exploitation
Source abstract
Abstract
Synthetic materials such as nonwovens, mats and membranes have been commonly used in civil engineering for many years. The changes of geotextile characteristics in time (permeability, porosity, etc.) are poorly understood. Many authors have presented the changes in the properties of synthetic materials, mainly based on laboratory tests. The studies on geotextile samples taken from working hydraulic structures are not so many. Over 40 years, the reduction in the permeability of nonwoven geotextile was about four-fold. Probably the reason for that reduction is mechanical clogging caused by fine particles which have moved from the earth dam soil to the nonwoven geotextile. Over 40 years of operations, despite the reduction in permeability of the nonwoven geotextile, the drainage worked properly. The experiment was conducted in the field and laboratory and a two-dimensional numerical model built in software package HYDRUS (two-dimensional/three-dimensional (2D/3D)) Standard was proposed. The field measurements allow calibration and validation of the numerical model. The conducted simulations showed that at a maximum water level in the reservoir equal to 3.32 m, the water supply to the drainage is higher from upstream than from downstream. Particularly, water supply from above to the drainage is absent.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Soil and Unsaturated Flow · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Hydraulic and Sanitary Engineering, University of Life Sciences, 60-637 Poznań, Poland
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Holtz, J. (2001). Geosynthetics for Soil Reinforcement, Geo-Institute of ASCE. The Ninth Spencer J. Buchanan Lecture, November 2001.
2. Geotextiles: Their rationale and future10.1016/0266-1144(85)90009-3 ↗
3. Hydraulic conductivity and pore sizes of nonwoven filter fabrics10.1016/0266-1144(85)90012-3 ↗
4. Metody badań właściwości filtracyjnych geosyntetyków
5. Kryteria doboru geosyntetyków jako warstw separacyjnych i filtracyjnych
6. Development of criteria for geotextile and granular filters
7. Giroud, J.P. (2006). The Vienna Terzaghi lecture. Geosynthetics Engineering: Successes, Failures and Lessons Learned, Proceedings of 5 Osterreichische Geotechniktagung, Osterreichischer Ingenieur und Architekten Verein, Vienna, Austria, 21–22 February 2005, International Geosynthetics Society. Available online: http://www.jcigs.org/8ICG/SL/GiroudTerzaghiLectureHandoutForYokohamaA4.pdf.
8. Koerner, R.M., and Koerner, G.R. (2015). Lessons learned from geotextile filter failures under challenging field conditions. Geotext. Geomembr., 272–281.10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.01.004 ↗
9. Soil-geotextile system interaction10.1016/0266-1144(91)90027-T ↗
10. Zmiany właściwości filtracyjnych włókniny po 22 latach eksploatacji w drenażu zapory ziemnej
11. Miszkowska, A., and Koda, E. (2018, January 7–8). Change of water permeability of nonwoven geotextile exploited in earthfill dam. Proceedings of the 25th Anniversary of MendelNet Conference Proceedings, Brno, Czech Republic. Available online: https://mendelnet.cz/pdfs/mnt/2018/01/92.pdf.
12. Performance of geotextile filters after 18 years’ service in drainage trenches10.1016/j.geotexmem.2016.02.002 ↗
13. Badania skuteczności działania geotekstyliów w konstrukcjach budownictwa wodno-melioracyjnego
14. Šimůnek, J., Šejna, M., and van Genuchten, M.T. (1999). The HYDRUS-2D Software Package for Simulating Two-Dimensional Movement of Water, Heat, and Multiple Solutes in Variably Saturated Media, International Ground Water Modeling Center, Colorado School of Mines. Version 2.0, IGWMC-TPS-53.
15. Modeling of soil water and salt dynamics and its effects on root water uptake in Heihe Arid wetland, Gansu, China10.3390/w7052382 ↗
16. Optimal Choice of Soil Hydraulic Parameters for Simulating the Unsaturated Flow: A Case Study on the Island of Miyakojima, Japan10.3390/w7105676 ↗
17. Calculating earth dam seepage using hydrus software applications
18. Zawadzki, P. (1991, January 23–25). Assessment of test methods used to measure geotextile pore size. Proceedings of the IV International Conference on Slope Stability and Protection, Wrocław, Poland. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330728794_Assessment_of_test_methods_used_to_measure_geotextile_pore_size.
19. Hu, H., Zhang, J., and Li, T. (2018). Dam-Break Flows: Comparison between Flow-3D, MIKE 3 FM, and Analytical Solutions with Experimental Data. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8122456 ↗
20. Modeling of Local Scour in Non-cohesive Soils Below Sills Using SSIIM Computer Code
21. Reduction of the Warta River flow caused by seepage from river bed, during additional discharge from Jeziorsko Reservoir10.15576/ASP.FC/2017.16.4.217 ↗
22. Negm, A., Capodici, F., Ciraolo, G., Maltese, A., Provenzano, G., and Rallo, G. (2017). Assessing the Performance of Thermal Inertia and Hydrus Models to Estimate Surface Soil Water Content. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7100975 ↗
23. Comparison of infiltration models with regard to design of rectangular infiltration trenches
24. Šimůnek, J., van Genuchten, M.T., and Šejna, M. (2012). The HYDRUS Software Package for Simulating the Two- and Three-Dimensional Movement of Water, Heat, and Multiple Solutes in Variably-Saturated Porous Media, PC-Progress. Technical Manual. Version 2.0.
25. ROSETTA: a computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00466-8 ↗
26. Modeling trench sidewall and bottom flow in on-site wastewater systems10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:8(693) ↗
27. Miszkowska, A., Lenart, S., and Koda, E. (2017). Changes of permeability of nonwoven geotextile due to clogging and cyclic water flow in laboratory conditions. Water, 9.10.3390/w9090660 ↗
28. Novak, P., Moffat, A.I.B., Nalluri, C., and Narayanam, R. (2001). Hydraulic Structures. Spon Press, Taylor & Francis Group.