Effects of Background Sounds on Annoyance Reaction to Foreground Sounds in Psychoacoustic Experiments in the Laboratory: Limits and Consequences
Source abstract
Abstract
In a variety of applications, e.g., psychoacoustic experiments, virtual sound propagation demonstration, or synthesized noise production, noise samples are played back in laboratories. To simulate realistic scenes or to mask unwanted background sounds, it is sometimes preferable to add background ambient sounds to the noise. However, this can influence noise perception. It should be ensured that either background sounds do not affect, e.g., annoyance from foreground noise or that possible effects can be quantified. Two laboratory experiments are reported, in which effects of mixing background sounds to foreground helicopter samples were investigated. By means of partially balanced incomplete block designs, possible effects of three independent variables, i.e., helicopter’s sound exposure level, background type, and background sound pressure level were tested on the dependent variable annoyance, rated on the ICBEN 11-point numerical scale. The main predictor of annoyance was helicopter’s sound exposure level. Stimuli with eventful background sounds were found to be more annoying than those with less eventful background sounds. Furthermore, background type and level interacted significantly. For the major part of the background sound level range, increasing the background level was associated with increased or decreased annoyance for stimuli with eventful and less eventful background sounds, respectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Noise Effects and Management · Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation · Vehicle Noise and Vibration Control
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Laboratory for Acoustics/Noise Control, Überlandstrasse 129, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland
Western Paraná State University (UNIOESTE), Cascavel, PR 85819-110, Brazil
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Auralization model for the perceptual evaluation of tyre–road noise10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.11.023 ↗
2. Auralization of a car pass-by using impulse responses computed with the pseudospectral time-domain method10.1121/1.4988309 ↗
3. Sample-based engine noise synthesis using an enhanced pitch-synchronous overlap-and-add method10.1121/1.4754663 ↗
4. Auralization of wind turbine noise: Emission synthesis10.3813/AAA.918683 ↗
5. Pieren, R., Bütler, T., and Heutschi, K. (2016). Auralization of accelerating passenger cars using spectral modeling synthesis. Appl. Sci., 6.10.3390/app6010005 ↗
6. Auralization of railway noise: Emission synthesis of rolling and impact noise10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.05.026 ↗
7. Creating sound immission mimicking real-life characteristics from a single wind turbine10.1016/j.apacoust.2018.08.015 ↗
8. Short-term annoyance reactions to civil helicopter and propeller-driven aircraft noise: A laboratory experiment10.1121/1.5090500 ↗
9. Taghipour, A., Sievers, T., and Eggenschwiler, K. (2019). Acoustic comfort in virtual inner yards with various building facades. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16.10.3390/ijerph16020249 ↗
10. Aletta, F., and Xiao, J. (2018). Towards a virtual soundwalk. Handbook of Research on Perception-Driven Approaches to Urban Assessment and Design, IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-5225-3637-6 ↗
11. The ideal urban soundscape: Investigating the sound quality of french cities
12. Perceptual assessment of quality of urban soundscapes with combined noise sources and water sounds10.1121/1.3298437 ↗
13. The influence of background sounds on loudness and annoyance of wind turbine noise10.3813/AAA.918555 ↗
14. Auditory masking of wanted and unwanted sounds in a city park10.3397/1.3484182 ↗
15. Effects of natural sounds on the perception of road traffic noise10.1121/1.3567073 ↗
16. Fastl, H., and Zwicker, E. (2007). Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models, Springer. [3rd ed.].10.1007/978-3-540-68888-4 ↗
17. Moore, B.C.J. (2012). An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing, Brill. [6th ed.].
18. Asymmetry of masking between complex tones and noise: The role of temporal structure and peripheral compression10.1121/1.1480422 ↗
19. Masked threshold for noise bands masked by narrower bands of noise: Effects of masker bandwidth and center frequency10.1121/1.4947079 ↗
20. Acoustic characteristics of outdoor spaces in an apartment complex10.3397/1.3702001 ↗
21. Acoustic roughness and fluctuation strength
22. DIN 45692:2009-08 (2009). Measurement Technique for the Simulation of the Auditory Sensation of Sharpness, German Institute for Standardization.
23. ISO 532-1:2017 (2017). Acoustics—Methods for Calculating Loudness—Part 1: Zwicker Method, International Organization for Standardization.
24. Ambient sound assessment of urban environments: Field studies in two French cities10.1016/S0003-682X(03)00061-6 ↗
25. Effect of background noise levels on community annoyance from aircraft noise10.1121/1.2821985 ↗
26. Dimensions underlying the perceived similarity of acoustic environments10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01162 ↗
27. Listening test comparing a-weighted and c-weighted sound pressure level as indicator of wind turbine noise annoyance10.3813/AAA.918764 ↗
28. Short-term annoyance reactions to stationary and time-varying wind turbine and road traffic noise: A laboratory study10.1121/1.4949566 ↗
29. ISO 1996-2:2017 (2017). Acoustics—Description, Measurement and Assessment of Environmental Noise—Part 2: Determination of Sound Pressure Levels, International Organization for Standardization.
30. Common Factors in the Identification of an Assortment of Brief Everyday Sounds10.1037/0096-1523.19.2.250 ↗
31. Intermittency ratio: A metric reflecting short-term temporal variations of transportation noise exposure10.1038/jes.2015.56 ↗
32. Oehlert, G.W. (2000). A First Course in Design and Analysis of Experiments, W. H. Freeman.
33. ISO/TS 15666 (2013). Technical Specification: Acoustics—Assessment of Noise Annoyance by Means of Social and Socio-Acoustic Surveys, International Organization for Standardization.
34. Pinheiro, J.C., and Bates, D.M. (2000). Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS, Springer. [1st ed.].10.1007/978-1-4419-0318-1 ↗
35. Petrov, B.N., and Csaki, F. (1971, January 2–8). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory, Tsahkadsor, Armenia.
36. Estimating the dimension of a model10.1214/aos/1176344136 ↗
37. Gescheider, G.A. (1997). Psychophysics: The Fundamentals, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. [3rd ed.].
38. Kingdom, F.A.A., and Prins, N. (2016). Psychophysics: A Practical Introduction, Academic Press (Elsevier Ltd.). [2nd ed.].10.1016/B978-0-12-407156-8.00001-3 ↗
39. Influence of visibility of wind farms on noise annoyance—A laboratory experiment with audio-visual simulations10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.01.014 ↗
40. On similarity and density of applause sounds10.17743/jaes.2017.0034 ↗
41. Taghipour, A., Schinkel-Bielefeld, N., Kumar, A., Delgado, P., and Herre, J. (2018). On the effect of inter-channel level difference distortions on the perceived subjective quality of stereo signals. 144th AES Convention, AES. Paper 9924.
42. Residential and acoustic environments perceived by residents of regional cities in Korea: A case study of Mokpo City10.1177/1420326X09358030 ↗
43. Semantic differential analysis of the soundscape in urban open public spaces10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.05.014 ↗
44. Designing sound and visual components for enhancement of urban soundscapes10.1121/1.4817924 ↗